Main Article Content

Abstract

The developments of communication technology nowadays open up the boundaries for us to get information. We used to wait for morning newspaper or the schedule of news program on Television to get recent issues. Now we can access any kind of updated news anytime anywhere with our hands using online media. The objective of this study is to explain the credibility perception of the news from the media used by the audience in Indonesia. The focus is to determine which media is considered the most credible between print and online media. This study is based on media theory from Harold Innis, one of the first theorists in media, about the bias of communication. The positivistic paradigm and quantitative approach with survey method is used in this study. The result shows that even though nowadays online media is prefered to be used, the content of news in print media considered be more credible.

 

Keywords : News Credibility; Print media; Online media

Keywords

News Credibility Print media Online media

Article Details

Author Biographies

Siti Nahdiah, Departement of Marketting Communication Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta

Faculty of Economy and Communication, Departement of Marketting Communication Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta

Cindy Ayu Agustin, Departement of Marketting Communication Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta

Faculty of Economy and Communication, Departement of Marketting Communication Bina Nusantara University, Jakarta
How to Cite
Nahdiah, S., & Agustin, C. A. (2017). News Credibility Perception based on Media. Asian Journal of Media and Communication, 1(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.20885/asjmc.vol1.iss2.art1

References

  1. Asa Briggs and Peter Burke. (2005). A Social History of the Media: From Gutenberg to
  2. the Internet Malden, MA: Polity Press
  3. Bucy, E. P. (2003). Media credibility reconsidered: Synergy effects between on-air and online
  4. news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 80(2), 247-264.
  5. Heise, D. R. ( 1970). The semantic differential and attitude research. In G. F. Summers (Ed.),
  6. Attitude measurement (pp. 235-253).
  7. Chicago: Rand McNally. Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelly, H. H. (1953).
  8. Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press.
  9. Kiousis, S. (2001). Public trust or mistrust? Perceptions of media credibility in the information age. Mass Communication Society, 4, 381-403.
  10. Jacobson, H. K. (1969). Mass media believability: A study of receiver judgments. Journalism Quarterly, 46, 20-28.
  11. Jo, S. (2005). The effect of online media credibility on trust relationships. Journal of Website Promotion, 1(2), 57-78
  12. Johnson, T.J., & Kaye, B.K. (1998). Cruising is believing? Comparing media and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325-340.
  13. Laughey, Dan. (2007). Key Themes in Media Theory: McGraw Hill International
  14. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2004). News audiences increasingly politicized: Online news audience larger, more Diverse. Retrieved June 4, 2007, from http://peoplepress.org/reports/display.php3?PageID=833
  15. Pew Research Center. (2005). The Media: more voices, less credibility. A review of Pew Research Center for the people and press findings.
  16. Slater, M.D. & Rouner, D. (1996). How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73(4), 974-991.
  17. Sternthal, B., Dholkia, R., & Leavitt, C. (1978). The persuasive effect of source credibility: Tests of cognitive response. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 252-260. Retrieved March 4, 2007, from
  18. JSTOR database.
  19. Sugiyono (2010). Metode Penelitian Bisnis. Alfabeta: Bandung