Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 2, 2017
Published
October 2, 2017
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 8193 Download : 9302

Main Article Content

Abstract

The main problems in this research: first, how are the theses constructed by the schools in legal philosophy? Second, what are the methodological consequences that emerge dut the different theses of each school in legal philosophy? This research was a normative legal research. The result of the research concluded, first, every law school that exists in legal philosophy has different thesis from one to the other. The thesis of natural law school is the thesis of morality and normativity. Legal realism separates law and moral, and puts more importance on social facts. The thesis of Kelsen's pure theory of law is a synthesis of the thesis of natural law and empirical positivism/legal realism. The thesis of American Sociological Jurisprudence is a synthesis of the legal positivism and the school of history; it separates law and morals as well as the unity between law and fact. Meanwhile, the thesis of utilitarianism is the separation between law and moral as well as the unity between law and fact. Second, the thesis differences in the schools of legal philosophy have consequences on the methodology that is used.

Keywords

Morality thesis normativity separability reductive methodology

Article Details

Author Biography

Mahrus Ali, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Fakultas Hukum
How to Cite
Ali, M. (2017). Pemetaan Tesis dalam Aliran-Aliran Filsafat Hukum dan Konsekuensi Metodologisnya. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 24(2), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss2.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Buku
  2. Absori, Kelik Wardiono, dan Saepul Rochman, Hukum Profetik Kritik terhadap Paradigma Non-Sistematik, Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta, 2015.
  3. Albert A. Ehrenzweic, Psychoanalytic Jurisprudence, Sijthoff/Oceana, Netherlands, 1971.
  4. Ali, Achmad, Sosiologi Hukum Kajian Empiris terhadap Pengadilan, Badan Penerbit Iblam, Jakarta, 2004.
  5. Ata Ujan, Andre, Filsafat Hukum, Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 2009.
  6. Bakir, Herman, Filsafat Hukum Desain dan Arsitektur Kesejarahan, PT. Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2007.
  7. Bodenheimer, Edgar, Jurisprudence The Philosophy and Method of the Law, Harvard University Press, USA, 1978.
  8. Davies, Margaret, Asking the Law Question, Edisi Ketiga, Lawbook CO, Australia, 2008.
  9. Dias, R.M.W., Jurisprudence, Edisi Kelima, Butterworhts, London, 1985.
  10. Dworkin, R. M., Filsafat Hukum Sebuah Pengantar, Diterjemahkan oleh Yudi Santoso, Merkid Press, Yogyakarta, 2007.
  11. Finch, John, Introduction to Legal Theory, Edisi Kedua, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1974.
  12. G. Murphy, Jeffrie, dan Jules L. Coleman, Philosophy of Law an Introduction to Jurisprudence, Edisi Revisi, Westview Press, London, 1990.
  13. Jimly Asshiddiqie dan M. Ali Safa’at, Teori Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum, Mahkamah Konstitusi, Jakarta, 2006.
  14. Huijbers, Theo, Filsafat Hukum dalam Lintasan Sejarah, Cetk. Keenambelas, Kanisius, Yogyakarta, 2012.
  15. Kelsen, Hans, Introduction to the Problem of Legal Theory, diterjemahkan oleh Bonnie Litschewski Paulson dan Stanley L. Paulson, Clarendon Press, Oxford New York, 1992.
  16. Sudirman, Antonius, Hati Nurani Hakim dan Putusannya Suatu Pendekatan dari Perspektif Ilmu Hukum Perilaku Kasus Hakim Bismar Siregar, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2007.
  17. Patterson, Dennis, (editor), A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Blackwell Publishers, United Kingdom, 1999.
  18. P. Fletcher, George, Basic Concepts of Legal Thought, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996.
  19. Rasjidi, Lili dan Ira Rasjidi, Dasar-dasar Filsafat dan Teori Hukum, Cetk, Ketujuh, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung, 2001.
  20. Salman S., Otje, Filsafat Hukum (Perkembangan dan Dinamika Masalah), Refika Aditama, Bandung, 2009.
  21. Shidarta, “Pemetaan Aliran-aliran Pemikiran Hukum dan Konsekuensi Metodologisnyaâ€, dalam Sulistyowati Irianto dan Shidarta (Editor), Metode Penelitian Hukum Konstelasi dan Refleksi, Cetk. Pertama, Yayasan Obor, Jakarta, 2009
  22. ______¬_, Karakteristik Penalaran Hukum dalam Konteks Keindonesiaan, CV. Utomo, Bandung, 2006.
  23. Simmons, N.E., Central Issues in Jurisprudence Justice, Law and Rights, Sweet & Maxwell, London, 1986.
  24. Jurnal
  25. Alschuler, Albert W.,†From Blackstone To Holmes: The Revolt Against Natural Lawâ€, Pepperdine Law Review, 36, 2009.
  26. Astomo, Putera, â€Perbandingan Pemikiran Hans Kelsen tentang Hukum dengan Gagasan Satjipto Rahardjo tentang Hukum Progresif Berbasis Teori Hukumâ€, Yustisia, Edisi 90, 2014.
  27. Barus, Zulfadli, “Analisis Filosofis tentang Peta Konseptual Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Penelitian Sosiologisâ€, Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, Vol. 13 No 2, 2013.
  28. Dagan, Hanoch, & Roy Kreitnerâ€, The Character of Legal Theoryâ€, Cornell Law Review, 96, 2011.
  29. Green, Michael Steven, “Hans Kelsen And The Logic Of Legal Systemsâ€, Alabama Law Review, 54, 365,2003.
  30. Hardianto, Danang, “Reorientation towards the Nature of Jurisprudence in Legal Researchâ€, Mimbar Hukum, Vol 26, No. 2, 2014.
  31. Luthan, Salman, “Dialektika Hukum dan Moral dalam Perspektif Filsafat Hukumâ€, Jurnal Hukum Ius Quita Iustum, No. 4, Vol 19, 2012
  32. Rappaport, Aaron, “The Logic of Legal Theory: Reflections on the Purpose and Methodology of Jurisprudenceâ€, Mississippi Law Journal, 73, 2004.
  33. Wignjosoebroto, Sutandyo, “Permasalahan Paradigma dalam Ilmu Hukumâ€, Jurnal Wacana, Vol 6, 2000.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>