"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> STRATEGI PEMITIGASIAN BIAS PENGUKURAN UMUM DALAM EVALUASI BALANCED SCORECARD DENGAN BALIKAN EKSPLANATORI | Silvia | Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia


Rina Silvia, Intiyas Utami, Usil Sis Sucahyo


This study aims to prove the existence of a common measure bias in the evaluation of Balanced Scorecard and test strategies explanatory feedback as mitigation common measure bias. Efforts mitigation impact of the proposed common measure bias in this study is to provide knowledge to the method of explanatory feedback. This research uses experimental design factorial 2x2x2 between-within subjects with 56 participants S1 Accounting students are already taking courses in management accounting. The first hypothesis testing in this research using the independent t-test, comparing the performance measurement group before getting explanatory feedback. The second hypothesis testing using a paired t-test to see performance measurement division before and after getting explanatory feedback. Results of laboratory experiments show that there is a common measure bias in the manager before receiving explanatory feedback. Explanatory feedback method is supported as a strategy mitigation common measure bias in the evaluation of BSC.


Balanced Scorecard; common measures; unique measures; debiasing; common measures bias; effect common measures bias; explanatory feedback


Asthon, R. H., dan S. S. Kramer. 1980. Students as surrogates in behavioral accounting research: some evidence. Journal of Accounting Research. Vol. 18 No.1

Atkinson, A. A., Kaplan, R. S., Matsumura. E. M., dan S. M Young. 2012. Akuntansi Manajemen. Jakarta: PT Indeks. Jilid Kedua, Edisi Kelima.

Banker, D. R., H. Chang, dan M. Pizzini. 2004. The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of performance measures linked to strategy. The Accounting Review 79 (1): 1-23.

______, D. R., H. Chang, dan M. Pizzini. 2011. The judgmental effects of strategy maps in balanced scorecard performance evaluations. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems 12 (4): 259-279.

Bazerman, M. H., dan D. A. Moore. 2009. Judgment in Managerial Decision Making (7th.ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley dan Sons.

Bonner, S. E. 1990. Experience effects in auditing: the role of task-spesific knowledge.The Accounting Review 65(1): 72-92

Bonner, S. E., dan B. L. Lewis. 1990. Determinants of auditor expertise. Journal of Accounting and Auditing. 28: 1-20

Bonner, S. E., dan P. L.Walker. 1994. The effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of auditing knowledge. The Accounting Review 1: 157-178

Bowman, E. H. 1963. Consistency and optimality in managerial decision making. Management Science 9 (1): 31-321.

Cheng, M. M., A. K.D. Schulz, P. F. Luckett dan P. Booth. 2003. The effects of hurdle rates on the level of escalation of commitment in capital budgeting. Behavioral Research in Accounting 15: 63-85.

Dilla, W. N., dan P. J. Steinbart. 2005a. Relative weighting of common and unique measures by knowledgeable decision makers. Behavioral Research in Accounting 17 (1): 43-53.

Earley, C. E. 2001. Expertise acquisition in auditing: training novice auditors to recognize cue relationships in real estate valuation. The Accounting Review 1: 81-97

______, C. E. 2003. A note on self-explanation as a training tools for novice auditors: the effects of outcome feedback timing and level of reasoning on performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting 15: 111-124

Einhorn, H. J. 1974. Expert judgment: some necessary conditions and an example. Journal of Applied Psychology: 71-562.

Gagne, M. L., J. Hollister dan G. J. Tully. 2006. Using the Balanced Scorecard: BothCommon and Unique Measures are Informative. Journal of Applied Business Research 22 (1): 147-160.

Georgina, J., dan Juniarti. 2015. Studi eksperimental: mengurangi bias pengukuran umum balance scorecard dalam penilaian kinerja pada mahasiswa S1 program manajemen pariwisata. Business Accounting Review 3 (1): 23-32.

Grevinga, K. H. M. 2013. Common measure bias in the balanced scorecard: an experiment with undergraduate students. Master’s Degree Thesis, University of Twente, Netherlands.

Holmstrom, B., dan P. Milgrom. 1991. Multitask principal-agent analysses: incentive contracts, asset ownership, and job design. Jurnal of Law, Economics, & Organization 7: 24-52.

Humphreys, K. A., dan K. T. Trotman. 2011. The balanced scorecard: the effect of stratey information on perfomance evaluation judgments. Journal of Management Accounting Research 23: 81-98.

Indriantoro, N., dan B. Supomo. 1999. Metode Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. BPFE- Yogyakarta, Edisi Pertama.

Ittner, C. D., D. F. Larcker, dan M. W. Meyer. 2003. Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review 8 (3): 725- 758.

Johnson, E. N., P. M. J Reckers dan G. D. Barlett. 2013. Influence timeline and perceived strategy efectiveness on balance scorecard performance evaluation judgements. Journal of Management Accounting Research (Spring) 26 (1): 165-184

Kaplan, R. S., dan D. P. Norton. 1992. The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review 70 (1): 71-79.

______, R. S., dan D. P. Norton. 1996. Linking the balanced scorecard to strategy. California Management Review 39 (1): 53-79.

______, R. S., dan D. P. Norton. 2001. The Strategy - focused organization: how balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Harvard Business School Press.

______, R. S., dan D. P. Norton. 2001a. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management (Part I). Accounting Horizons 15 (1): 87-104.

______, R. S., dan D.P. Norton. 2001b. Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management (Part II). Accounting Horizons 15 (2): 147-160.

Kaskey, V. L. 2008. The balanced scorecard: a comparative study of accounting education and experience on common measure bias and trust in a balanced scorecard. PhD Dissertation. School of Business and Technology, Capella University, USA.

Kennedy, J. 1993. Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: a framework and experimental results. Journal of Accounting Research 31: 481-491.

______, J. 1995. Debiasing the curse of knowledge in audit judgment. The Accounting Review 70 (2): 249-273.

______, T., Salterio, S. E., dan A. Webb. 2004. The balanced scorecard: the effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. The Accounting Review 79 (4): 1075-1094.

Liedtka, S. L., Church, B. K., dan M. R. Ray. 2008. Performance variability, ambiguity intolerance, and balanced scorecard-based performance assessments. Behavioral Research in Accounting 20(2): 73-88.

Lipe, M. G., dan S. E. Salterio. 2000. The balanced scorecard: judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review 75 (3): 283-298.

Malina, M. A., dan F. H. Selto. 2001. Communicating and controlling strategy. An empirical study for the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal Management Accounting Research 13: 47-90.

Nahartyo, E., dan I. Utami. 2015. Panduan praktis riset eksperimen. PT Indeks, Jakarta.

Niven, P. R. 2006. Balanced Scorecard Step-by-StepMaximizing Performance And Maintaining Results (2th. ed.) New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.

Pramono, K dan Juniarti. 2014. Studi eksperimental: mengurangi bias pengukuran umum balanced scorecard dalam penilaian kinerja pada mahasiswa program manajemen bisnis. Business Accounting Review 2 (2): 133-141.

Rigby, D., dan B. Bilodeau. 2013. Management Tools & Trends 2013. Bain & co.

Roberts, M. L., A. T. L lbright, dan A. R. Hibbets. 2004. Debiasing balanced scorecard evaluations. Behavioral Research in Accounting 16 (1): 75-88.

Serfas, S. 2011. Cognitive biases in the capital investment context: theoritical consideration and empirical experiments on violations of normative rationality. Dissertation, Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany.

Shadish, R.W., T. Cook, dan D.T. Campbell. 2002. Experimental and quasi- experimental design for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin Company

Slovic, P., dan D. MacPhillamy. 1974. Dimensional commensurability and cue utilization in comparative judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 11( 2) : 172- 194.

Tuttle, B. M., dan M. H. Stocks. 1998. The use of outcome feedback and task property information by subjects with accounting domain knowledge to predict financial distress. Behavioral Research in Accounting 10: 76-108.

Trotman K.T., dan P. W. Leung .2008. Effect of different types of feedback on the level of auditors’ configural information processing. Accounting and Finance 48: 301–318.

Tversky, A., dan D, Kahneman. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science. 185: 1124-1131.

Utami, I. 2013. Strategi pemitigasian efek halo dalam menentukan resiko salah saji material dengan metoda akuisisi pengetahuan swa-eksplanasi dan balikan eksplanatori. Disertasi UGM-Yogyakarta.

Wong-on-Wing, B., L. Guo, W. Li, dan D. Yang D. 2007. Reducing Conflict in Balanced Scorecard Evaluations. Accounting, Organizations and Society 32(4-5): 363-377.

ISSN 1410-2420

JURNAL AKUNTANSI DAN AUDITING INDONESIA (JAAI) is published by Accounting Department, Faculty of Economics, Islamic University of Indonesia and Supported by IAI-KAPd (Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia - Kompartemen Akuntan Pendidik)

Creative Commons License
JAAI pada http://journal.uii.ac.id/index.php/JAAI/ terlisensi oleh Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.