Main Article Content

Abstract

Pension funds are financial programs established by individuals or companies to secure the future of employees by providing benefits during their retirement years. Pension funds are built up through contributions made by both the participants (employees) and the employer. To calculate the amount of pension benefits, normal costs, and actuarial liabilities, various method are used, including the constant percent benefit prorate method. A key factor influencing these calculations is the interest rate. This study employs the Vasicek model, a stochastic interest rate model, to analyze the Unfunded Actuarial Liability (UAL). The analysisi reveals that the amount of normal cost (annual contributions) will vary, and both contributions and actuarial liabilities that are calculated using vasicek interest rate for each participant will adjust based on the interest rate during their retirement period. The amount of UAL is derived from the discrepancy between the total amount of actuarial liabilities from all the participant in certain period and the accumulated funds. The UAL is sufficient to cover future pension fund payments when calculated using the Vasicek interest rate model.

Keywords

Actuarial Liability Benefit Prorate Pension Fund Unfunded Actuarial Liability Vasicek Interest Rate

Article Details

How to Cite
Khafifa , L. N. ., Julianty, D. T., & Listiani, A. (2025). Pension Funding Calculation Using the Benefit Prorate Method of the Constant Percent Type and Vasicek Interest Rates: Pension Fund Using Vasicek Model Based-Interest Rate. Enthusiastic : International Journal of Applied Statistics and Data Science, 5(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.20885/enthusiastic.vol5.iss2.art3

References

  1. D.P. Sari, “Pembentukkan dana pensiun dengan metode benefit prorate constant percent,” J. Gener. Kampus, vol. 6, no. 2, 2013, doi: 10.21009/JGK.062.03.
  2. Presiden Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 1992 tentang Dana Pensiun. Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, 1992.
  3. M. Ahyar, N. Satyahadewi, and H. Perdana, “Metode projected unit credit dan individual level premium dalam perhitungan dana pensiun,” Bimaster, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 151–158, 2021, doi: 10.26418/bbimst.v10i1.44769.
  4. T.J. Mega, N. Satyahadewi, and H. Perdana, “Optimalisasi waktu pengembalian manfaat pensiun menggunakan metode benefit prorate tipe constant percent,” Bimaster, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 351–360, 2020, doi: 10.26418/bbimst.v9i3.40890.
  5. A.R. Wijaya, N. Satyahadewi, and S.W. Rizki, “Perbandingan metode benefit prorate tipe constant dollar dan tipe constant percent pada pendanaan pensiun manfaat pasti (studi kasus: Data guru kontrak Kec. Nanga tayap kab. Ketapang),” Bimaster, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 177–182, 2017, doi: 10.26418/bbimst.v6i03.21857.
  6. R.I. Sari and N. Satyahadewi, “Penerapan metode cost prorate tipe constant percent untuk perhitungan nilai kewajiban aktuaria dana pension,” Bimaster, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 223–226, 2014, doi: 10.26418/bbimst.v3i03.7441.
  7. S. Cahyani and R. Kusumawati, “Metode benefit prorate constant dollar untuk penghitungan dana pensiun menggunakan suku bunga model Vasicek,” J. Kaji. Terap. Mat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 62–72, 2018, doi: 10.21831/jktm.v7i1.10553.
  8. F. Willieardan, I.N. Widana, and I.P.W. Gautama, “Penggunaan metode projected unit credit pada asuransi pensiun gabungan model Vasicek dan CIR,” E-J. Mat, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2017, doi: 10.24843/mtk.2023.v12.i01.p398.
  9. S. Artika, I.G.P. Purnaba, and D.C. Lesmana, “Penentuan premi asuransi jiwa berjangka menggunakan model vasicek dan model Cox-Ingersoll-Ross (CIR),” J. Mat. Its Appl., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 129–139, 2018, doi: 10.29244/jmap.17.2.129-139.
  10. H.E. Winklevoss, Pension Mathematics With Numerical Illustrations, 2 ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Pension Research Council and University of Pennsylvania Press Philadelphia, 1993.
  11. I.G.A.K.K. Wardhani, I.N. Widana, dan N.K.T. Tastrawati, “Perhitungan dana pensiun dengan metode projected unit credit dan individual level premium,” E-J. Mat., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 64–74, 2014, doi: 10.24843/MTK.2014.v03.i02.p067.
  12. S. Sofiyani dan Y. Permanasari, “Penerapan metode cubic spline interpolation untuk Menentukan Peluang Kematian pada tabel mortalita,” J. Ris. Mat., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 29–36, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.29313/jrm.v3i1.1735.
  13. T. Futami, Matematika Asuransi Jiwa, 1 ed. Japan: Incorporated Foundation, 1993.
  14. N.L Bowers, H.U. Gerber, J.C. Hickman, D.A. Jones, and C.J. Nesbitt, Actuarial Mathematics. Schaumburg, IL, USA: Society of Actuaries, 1997.
  15. D.C.M. Dickson, M.R. Hardy, and H.R. Waters, Actuarial Mathematics for Life Contingent Risks. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  16. S. Manullang, D.T. Siahaan, F.D. Saribu, J. Pasaribu, and F.N. Trurnip, “Perhitungan manfaat pasti dengan metode spreading gains and losses pada program pensiun,” Innovative, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 5211–5219, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.31004/innovative.v4i2.9968.
  17. G. Ayrancı, “Distributions of the parameters in Vasicek model,” M.S. thesis, Dept. Actuar. Sci., Yasar Univ., İzmir, Turkey, 2013.
  18. Z.D. Nastiti, “Implementasi model tingkat suku bunga Cox Ingersoll Ross (CIR) untuk menentukan iuran normal pensiun program manfaat pasti,” B.S. thesis, Faculty Mat. Sci., Institut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember, Surabaya, Indonesia, 2015.
  19. S.M. Ross, Sthocastic Process, 2 ed. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California, Berkeley, 1996.
  20. W. Ekasasmita, N.F. Adhalia, and A. Lawi, “Simulasi pergerakan harga saham menggunakan model Brownian motion,” Sem. Nas. Teknik Elekt. Inform. (SNTEI), vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 249–253, 2022.