Main Article Content

Abstract

It is thought that the reformulation of the political agrarian is urgently, seriously and effectively managed. This reformulation is required firstly because the political changes, during the New Order regime with its 'developmental ideologi, have ever destroyed the regulations of legal agrarian. Secondly, it is intended to enable the social welfare and human values to be appropriately constructed. The fundamental weaknesses of the Basic Principle of Agrarian Law and the changing bases of the facets of material, social, economy, political and legal customs are also regarded as apart of the opinion of why the political reformulation of the legal agrarian must be enforced immediately. The main point of the reformulation is also concerned with the position of Legal societies and nations, and is should be framed on the equaiity paradigm in law. Another point is that reconstruction of the regulations of authority and land ownership.

Keywords

Reformulation Political Agrarian Agrarian Law

Article Details

How to Cite
Kamis, M. (2016). Reformulasi Politik Hukum Agraria. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 7(13), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol7.iss13.art1

References

  1. Daftar Pustaka
  2. Arief, Sritua. 1997. Pembangunanisme dan
  3. EkonomI Indonesia. Pemberdayaan
  4. Rakyat dalam Arus Gioballsasi.
  5. Jakarta: Zaman.
  6. Bachriadi, Dianto. 1998. Merana Di Tengah
  7. Kellmpahan. Jakarta: ELSAM.
  8. Budiman, Arief. 1991. Negara dan
  9. Pembangunan. Studi Tentang Indo
  10. nesia dan Korea Seiatan. Jakarta:
  11. Padi dan Kapas.
  12. Fakih, Mansour. "ReformasI Agraria Era
  13. Gioballsasi. Teori, Refleksi dan Aksi."
  14. Dalam Dianto Bachriadi, Erpan Faryadi
  15. & Bonie Setiawan (Eds). 1997.
  16. ReformasiAgraria. FE.UI. Jakarta.
  17. Friedman, ML. 1984. "American Law". W.W.
  18. Norton Company.
  19. Konvensi ILO 169. Mengenai Bangsa
  20. Pribumi dan Masyarakat Adat di
  21. Negara-negara Merdeka. Jakarta:
  22. ELSAM.
  23. Kusuma, Mulyana&Paul S. Baut. 1988. Hukum,
  24. Politik dan Perubahan Sosiai.
  25. Jakarta: YLBHI.
  26. Lev, Daniel S. 1966. The Transition To
  27. Quided Democracy Indonesian
  28. Poiitics ^957-f959. Caiifomia: Brooks/
  29. Cole Publishing Company.
  30. . 1991. Hukum dan Politik.
  31. Kesinambungan dan Perubahan.
  32. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  33. Mahfud, Moh MD. 1998. Poiitik Hukum Di
  34. Indonesia. Jakarta: LP3ES.
  35. Myren, Rijchard. 1988. Lawand Justice. An
  36. introduction. Caiifomia: Brook/Cole
  37. Publishing Company.
  38. Peters,A.A.G &Koesriani Siswosoebroto. 1990.
  39. Hukum dan Perkembangan Sosiai.
  40. Buku Teks Sosiologi Hukum. Buku
  41. • ///. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
  42. Rahardjo, Satjipto. 1986. Hukum dan
  43. Masyarakat. Bandung: Angkasa.
  44. Sumardjono, Maria. S.W. 1994. "Dinamisasi
  45. Prinsip-Prinsip UUPA Dalam Kerangka
  46. Umum Poiitik Pertanahan Dalam PJP II." Makalah Disampaikan pada Semi nar Nasional Permasalahan dan Tantangan PolitikPertanahan Daiam
  47. PJP li Kerjasama FH-UGM & BPN. pada tanggal 29 Oktober 1994 di. Yogyakarta.