Main Article Content
Abstract
To defence trusting from client and user of financial statement, public accountant strives to have adequacy competent. The competents are professionalism, auditor’s knowledge for errors and public accountants’ judgement of materiality level. The aim of this study was to get emperical evidence about the effect of professionalism, auditor’s knowledge for errors and professional ethics on public accountants’ judgement of materiality level in the auditing process of financial statements. Data were obtained by survey questionnaires, which were completed by accountants who work at Registered Public Accountants, started from senior up to partner level. Data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis. The result of this study showed that professionalism, auditor’s knowledge for errors and professional ethics have significant and positive influence to public accountants’ judgment of materiality level in auditing process of financial statements.
Keywords: Professionalism, auditor’s knowledge for errors, professional ethics and public accountants’judgment of materiality level
Keywords: Professionalism, auditor’s knowledge for errors, professional ethics and public accountants’judgment of materiality level
Article Details
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).