Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 596 Download : 786

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Corporate governance (CG) aims to protect the interests of stakeholders by ensuring that the company is managed properly. This study aims to examine the relationship between board of commissioners (BOC) characteristics and CG disclosure. BOC characteristics consist of board size, board independence, board meeting, educational background, and cross membership. The sample of this study was sharia compliant companies listed in Indonesia’s sharia securities list registered in the year of 2017-2020. The data were analyzed using panel data regression. This study analysis 160 data from 40 companies. The results show that the level of CG disclosure is high reaching 88.89%. It may give a positive value that the companies may already have the awareness to provide adequate disclosure regarding the implementation of CG principles. The results also show that the board independence has positive effect on the CG disclosure. The finding may have impact on the regulator and users to encourage more roles of BOC in CG disclosure.

Keywords

board of commissioners corporate governance disclosure sharia compliant company

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Peni Nugraheni, Syed Musa Alhabshi, Romzie Rosman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Chakraborty, A. (2018). Board composition diversity and corporate social reporting : an empirical study in Bangladesh perspective. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 7(2), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijafr.v7i2.12162
  2. Darmadi, S. (2013). Corporate governance disclosure in the annual report: An exploratory study on Indonesian Islamic banks. Humanomics, 29(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288661311299295
  3. Dienes, D., & Velte, P. (2016). The impact of supervisory board composition on CSR reporting: Evidence from the German two-tier system. Sustainability, 8(64), 1–20.
  4. El-Halaby, S., & Hussainey, K. (2016). Determinants of compliance with AAOIFI standards by Islamic banks. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 9(1), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2015-0074
  5. Elgattani, T., & Hussainey, K. (2020). The determinants of AAOIFI governance disclosure in Islamic banks. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2019-0040
  6. Fahad, P., & Rahman, P. M. (2020). Impact of corporate governance on CSR disclosure. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 17(2–3), 155–167.
  7. Grassa, R., & Matoussi, H. (2014). Corporate governance of Islamic banks: A comparative study between GCC and Southeast Asia countries. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 7(3), 346–362.
  8. Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1986). Upper Echelons : The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206.
  9. Haniffa, R. (2002). Social reporting disclosure-an Islamic perspective. Indonesian Management & Accounting Research, 1(2), 126–146.
  10. Hartmann, C. C., & Carmenate, J. (2020). Does board diversity influence firms’ corporate social responsibility reputation? Social Responsibility Journal, 17(8), 1299–1319. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2020-0143
  11. Hasan, R., Sharmeen, K., & Sultana, A. (2017). Influence of internal and external governance mechanisms on corporate governance disclosure among Islamic and conventional banks. Global Review of Islamic Economics and Business, 5(1), 25–36.
  12. Homroy, S., & Slechten, A. (2019). Do board expertise and networked boards affect environmental performance ? Journal of Business Ethics, 158(1), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3769-y
  13. IFC. (2014). Indonesia Corporate Governance Manual.
  14. Khaireddine, H., Salhi, B., Aljabr, J., & Jarboui, A. (2019). Impact of board characteristics on governance, environmental and ethical disclosure. Society and Business Review, 15(3), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-05-2019-0067
  15. Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207–223.
  16. Nomran, N. M., Haron, R., & Hassan, R. (2017). Bank performance and shari’ ah supervisory board attributes of Islamic banks : does bank size matter ? Journal of Islamic Finance, 6(Special Issue), 174–187.
  17. Nugraheni, P. (2018). Sharia supervisory board and social performance of Indonesian Islamic banks. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 22(2), 137–147.
  18. Nugraheni, P., & Permatasari, D. (2016). Perusahaan Syariah dan pengungkapan corporate social responsibility : Analisis pengaruh faktor internal dan karakteristik perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 20(2), 136–146.
  19. Othman, R., Thani, A. M., & Ghani, E. K. (2009). Determinants of Islamic social reporting among top shariah-approved companies in bursa Malaysia. Research Journal of Internatıonal Studıes, 12, 4–20.
  20. PwC. (2020). The eight key effective corporate governance practices. PWC. https://www.pwc.ie/services/human-resource-services/insights/the-eight-key-effective-corporate-governance-practices.html
  21. Rahman, A. A., & Bukair, A. A. (2013). The influence of the Shariah supervision board on corporate social responsibility disclosure by Islamic banks of Gulf co-operation council countries. Asian Journal of Business and Accounting, 6(2), 65–104.
  22. Rao, K., & Tilt, C. (2016). Board diversity and CSR reporting: an Australian study. Meditari Accountancy Reserach, 24(2), 182–210.
  23. Salehi, M., Tarighi, H., & Rezanezhad, M. (2017). The relationship between board of directors’ structure and company ownership with corporate social responsiblity disclosure: Iranian angle. Humanomics, 33(4), 398–418.
  24. Samaha, K., Dahawy, K., Hussainey, K., & Stapleton, P. (2012). The extent of corporate governance disclosure and its determinants in a developing market : The case of Egypt. Advances in Accounting, Incorporating Advances in International Accounting, 28(1), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adiac.2011.12.001
  25. Setiawan, D., Hapsari, R. T., & Wibawa, A. (2018). Dampak karakteristik dewan direksi terhadap pengungkapan corporate social responsibility pada perusahaan pertambangan di Indonesia. MIX: Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 8(1), 1–15.
  26. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2017-0057
  27. Yaya, R., Wibowo, S. A., Ulfaturrahmah, & Jalaludin, D. (2018). Environmental disclosure practices after mandatory disclosure policy in Indonesia. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 12(4), 88–100.
  28. Zaheer, N. (2013). Effects of duality , board size and board composition on corporate governance disclosure in Pakistan. International SAMANM Journal of Finance and Accounting, 1(3), 1–16.