Article Sidebar

Download
Full Text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1338 Download : 1235

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Technological developments have an enormous impact on social and economic life, including the potential adoption of artificial intelligence in the public sector. This research focuses on perceived trustworthiness regarding the potential use of artificial intelligence in the public sector through the perceptions of the Millennial generation and Generation Z. Using a mixed-method through a Likert scale survey combined with open-ended questions, this research finds significant evidence that perceived trustworthiness is influenced by ability, benevolence, and integrity. The results of the open question analysis show that ability perception exists due to the following: perception of expertise in government institutions; benevolence due to the moral aspect to deliver public services; integrity which consists of two contrasting perspectives namely; first, positive feedback of trust toward government integrity, and second, negative feedback in questioning government integrity.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Aviandi Okta Maulana, Georgius Chandra Herfanda, Faradillah Hasan

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Abu Daqar, M. A. M., Arqawi, S., & Karsh, S. A. (2020). Fintech in the eyes of Millennials and Generation Z (the financial behavior and Fintech perception). Banks and Bank Systems, 15(3), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(3).2020.03
  2. Alaloul, W. S., Liew, M. S., Zawawi, N. A. W. A., & Kennedy, I. B. (2019). Industrial Revolution 4.0 in the construction industry: Challenges and opportunities for stakeholders. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 11(1), 225–230.
  3. Alshahrani, A., Dennehy, D., & Mäntymäki, M. (2021). Adopting artificial intelligence in the Saudi Arabian public sector: Preliminary findings. In D. Dennehy, A. Griva, N. Pouloudi, Y. K. Dwivedi, I. Pappas, & M. Mäntymäki (Eds.), Responsible AI and Analytics for an Ethical and Inclusive Digitized Society (Vol. 12896, pp. 71–81). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85447-8_7
  4. Azimi, S., Andonova, Y., & Schewe, C. (2021). Closer together or further apart? Values of hero generations Y and Z during crisis. Young Consumers, 23(2), 179-196. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2021-1300
  5. Baum, T. (2020). A changing world of work. What can we learn from the service sector about employing Millennials (and Gen Z)? Organizational Dynamics, 49(3), 100715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2019.04.001
  6. BPS. (2021). Sensus Penduduk 2020 - Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/pressrelease/2021/01/21/1854/hasil-sensus-penduduk-2020.html
  7. Cath, C., Wachter, S., Mittelstadt, B., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and the ‘Good Society’: the US, EU, and UK approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 505–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9901-7
  8. Chen, Y. N. K., & Wen, C. H. R. (2021). Impacts of attitudes toward government and corporations on public trust in Artificial Intelligence. Communication Studies, 72(1), 115–131.
  9. Creswell. (2009). Creswell (2008) Research Design.pdf (p. 296).
  10. Dash, G., Kiefer, K., & Paul, J. (2021). Marketing-to-Millennials: Marketing 4.0, customer satisfaction and purchase intention. Journal of Business Research, 122(October 2020), 608–620.
  11. Dhungel, A. K., Wessel, D., Zoubir, M., & Heine, M. (2021). Too Bureaucratic to Flexibly Learn about AI? The Human-Centered Development of a MOOC on Artificial Intelligence in and for Public Administration. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 563–567. https://doi.org/10.1145/3473856.3473998
  12. Djafarova, E., & Foots, S. (2022). Exploring ethical consumption of generation Z: theory of planned behaviour. Young Consumers, 23(3), 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/yc-10-2021-1405
  13. Faúndez-Ugalde, A., Mellado-Silva, R., & Aldunate-Lizana, E. (2020). Use of artificial intelligence by tax administrations: An analysis regarding taxpayers’ rights in Latin American countries. Computer Law and Security Review, 38, 105441.
  14. Gillath, O., Ai, T., Branicky, M., Keshmiri, S., Davison, R., & Spaulding, R. (2021). Attachment and trust in artificial intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106607
  15. Goggin, G. (2020). COVID-19 apps in Singapore and Australia: reimagining healthy nations with digital technology. Media International Australia, 177(1), 61–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X20949770
  16. Grimmelikhuijsen, S. G., & Meijer, A. J. (2014). Effects of transparency on the perceived trustworthiness of a government organization: Evidence from an online experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(1), 137–157.
  17. Hanifawati, T., Dewanti, V. W., & Saputri, G. D. (2019). The role of social media influencer on brand switching of millenial and gen Z: A study of food-beverage products. Journal of Applied Management, 17(4), 625–638.
  18. James, A., & Whelan, A. (2022). ‘Ethical’ artificial intelligence in the welfare state: Discourse and discrepancy in Australian social services. Critical Social Policy, 42(1), 22–42.
  19. Janssen, M., Rana, N. P., Slade, E. L., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2018). Trustworthiness of digital government services: deriving a comprehensive theory through interpretive structural modelling. Public Management Review, 20(5), 647–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1305689
  20. Kim, S., & Austin, L. (2020). Effects of CSR initiatives on company perceptions among Millennial and Gen Z consumers. Corporate Communications, 25(2), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-07-2018-0077
  21. Kuziemski, M., & Misuraca, G. (2020). AI governance in the public sector: Three tales from the frontiers of automated decision-making in democratic settings. Telecommunications Policy, 44(6), 101976.
  22. Mahmoud, A. B., Fuxman, L., Mohr, I., Reisel, W. D., & Grigoriou, N. (2021). “We aren’t your reincarnation!” workplace motivation across X, Y and Z generations. International Journal of Manpower, 42(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-09-2019-0448
  23. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
  24. Mehr, H. (2017). Artificial Intelligence for Citizen Services and Government (pp. 1–16). Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation. https://ash.harvard.edu/files/ash/files/artificial_intelligence_for_citizen_services.pdf
  25. Mhlanga, D. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the industry 4.0, and its impact on poverty, innovation, infrastructure development, and the sustainable development goals: Lessons from emerging economies? Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(11), 1–16.
  26. Moon, M. J. (2002). The evolution of E-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424–433.
  27. Newman, J., Mintrom, M., & O’Neill, D. (2022). Digital technologies, artificial intelligence, and bureaucratic transformation. Futures, 136, 102886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102886
  28. Omoteso, K. (2012). The application of artificial intelligence in auditing: Looking back to the future. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(9), 8490–8495.
  29. Philbeck, T., & Davis, N. (2019). The fourth industrial revolution: Shaping a new era. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 17–22.
  30. Reis, J., Santo, P. E., & Melao, N. (2019). Impacts of artificial intelligence on public administration: A systematic literature review. 14th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies, 2019-June(June), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.23919/CISTI.2019.8760893
  31. Rizer, A., & Watney, C. (2018). Artificial intelligence can make our jail system more efficient, equitable and just. Texas Review of Law & Politics, 23(1), 181–227.
  32. Schlee, R. P., Eveland, V. B., & Harich, K. R. (2020). From Millennials to Gen Z: Changes in student attitudes about group projects. Journal of Education for Business, 95(3), 139–147.
  33. Sousa, W. G. de, Melo, E. R. P. de, Bermejo, P. H. D. S., Farias, R. A. S., & Gomes, A. O. (2019). How and where is artificial intelligence in the public sector going? A literature review and research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), 101392.
  34. Stewart, J. S., Oliver, E. G., Cravens, K. S., & Oishi, S. (2017). Managing millennials: Embracing generational differences. Business Horizons, 60(1), 45–54.
  35. Sun, T. Q., & Medaglia, R. (2019). Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector: Evidence from public healthcare. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.008
  36. Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
  37. Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society, 40(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377
  38. The Jakarta Post. (2020, October 9). AI to bring in $366b to Indonesia’s GDP by 2030. The Jakarta Post. https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2020/10/09/ai-to-bring-in-366b-to-indonesias-gdp-by-2030.html
  39. Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of E-Government – A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
  40. Vitezić, V., & Perić, M. (2021). Artificial intelligence acceptance in services: connecting with Generation Z. Service Industries Journal, 41(13–14), 926–946.
  41. Wankhede, A., Rajvaidya, R., & Bagi, S. (2021). Applications of artificial intelligence and the millennial expectations and outlook towards artificial intelligence. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 25(4), 1–16.
  42. Yakimova, V. A. (2020). AI-Audit: The Perspectives of Digital Technology Application in the Audit Activity. Proceedings of the III International Scientific and Practical Conference “Digital Economy and Finances,” 137, 138–142. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200423.030.