Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 660 Download : 731

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Existing audit standards must guide auditors in carrying out their profession. Audit standards regulate auditors in compiling reports with good performance and according to the professional code of ethics. The goal of this study was to examine the impact of professional ethics, auditor independence, auditor experience, and auditor professionalism on auditor performance during a pandemic by taking samples from public accounting firms in Jakarta and Surabaya with 170 respondents. Using the Structural Equation Model (SEM), this study aims to solve the research questions. The findings of the study showed that auditor professionalism had an effect on auditor performance, while professional ethics, independence, and experience of auditors had no such effect. Public accounting firms must improve and maintain the professionalism of each auditor in order to avoid the manipulation of financial statements and produce maximum performance.

Keywords

Ethics independence experience professionalism performance

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Budiandru Budiandru

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Aditya, A. A. G. D., & Kusuma, M. G. W. (2019). The effect of Tri Hita Karana Culture in relationship between work stress and internal auditor performance. International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 6(2), 72–78.
  2. Ado, A. B., Rashid, N., Mustapha, U. A., & Ademola, L. S. (2020). The impact of audit quality on the financial performance of listed companies Nigeria. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(9), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.09.07
  3. Afifah, U., Sari, R. N., Anugerah, R., & Sanusi, Z. M. (2015). The effect of role conflict, self-efficacy, professional ethical sensitivity on auditor performance with emotional quotient as moderating variable. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31(15), 206–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01222-8
  4. Ahonen, P., & Koljonen, J. (2020). The contents of the National Audit Office of Finland Performance Audits, 2001 – 2016 an interpretive study with computational. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 32(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBAFM-11-2018-0138
  5. Aizsila, I., & Ikaunieks, R. (2014). Changes and challenges facing the audit profession in Latvia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 156, 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.253
  6. Alwardat, Y. A., & Basheikh, A. M. (2017). The impact of performance audit on public administrations in Saudi Arabia: an exploratory study. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(12), 144–157. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n12p144
  7. Ardelean, A. (2013). Auditors’ ethics and their impact on public trust. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 92, 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.637
  8. Argento, D., Umans, T., Håkansson, P., & Johansson, A. (2018). Reliance on the internal auditors’ work: experiences of Swedish external auditors. Journal of Management Control, 29(3), 295–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-018-00272-7
  9. Asmara, R. Y. (2019). Effect of complexcity, due professional care and auditor ethics on audit quality. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 5(12), 18–25. www.eprajournals.com
  10. Barrainkua, I., & Espinosa-Pike, M. (2018). The influence of auditors’ professionalism on ethical judgement: differences among practitioners and postgraduate students. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 21(2), 176–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2017.07.001
  11. Basri, T. H., Muda, I., & Lumbanraja, P. (2019). The effect of professionalism, organizational culture, leadership style, independence auditors on auditor performance with intelligence spiritual as a variable moderating on Office Public Accountants in Medan. International Journal of Research and Review, 6(6), 163–179.
  12. Baud, C., Brivot, M., & Himick, D. (2019). Accounting ethics and the fragmentation of value. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 373–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04186-9
  13. Broadstock, D. C., Chan, K., Cheng, L. T. W., & Wang, X. (2021). The role of ESG performance during times of financial crisis: evidence from covid-19 in China. Finance Research Letters, 38, 1–11.
  14. Dali, N., & Mas’ud, A. (2014). The impact of professionalism, locus of control and job satisfaction on auditors’ performance: Indonesian evidence. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 3(10), 63–73.
  15. Dali, N., & Setiawan, M. (2013). Professionalism and locus of control influence on job satisfaction moderated by spirituality at work and its impact on performance auditor. International Journal of Business and Management Invention ISSN, 2(10), 1–11. www.ijbmi.org
  16. Desmedt, E., Morin, D., Pattyn, V., & Brans, M. (2017). Impact of performance audit on the administration: a Belgian study (2005-2010). Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(3), 251–275.
  17. Du, X., Yin, J., & Hou, F. (2018). Auditor human capital and financial misstatement: evidence from China. China Journal of Accounting Research, 11(4), 279–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2018.06.001
  18. Edwy, F. M., Hasan, A., & Kamaliah. (2019). Pengaruh independensi, motivasi, komitmen organisasi, pengalaman, dan gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kinerja auditor Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan Perwakilan Provinsi Riau. Pendidikan Ekonomi & Bisnis, 11(1), 16–29.
  19. Glover, S. M., & Douglas, F. (2013). Enhancing auditor professional skepticism. in Brigham Young University.
  20. Gold, A., & Heilmann, M. (2019). The consequences of disclosing Key Audit Matters (KAMs): a review of the academic literature. Maandblad Voor Accountancy En Bedrijfseconomie, 93(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.5117/mab.93.29496
  21. Hardiningsih, P., Januarti, I., Oktaviani, R. M., Srimindarti, C., & Udin, U. (2019). Determinants of audit quality: an empirical insight from Indonesia. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 8(7), 570–578.
  22. Herda, D. N., & Martin, K. A. (2016). The effects of auditor experience and professional commitment on acceptance of underreporting time: a moderated mediation analysis. Current Issues in Auditing, 10(2), A14–A27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ciia-51479
  23. Heyrani, F., Banimahd, B., & Roudposhti, F. R. (2016). Investigation of the effect of auditors’ professionalism levels on their judgment to resolve the conflict between auditor and management. Procedia Economics and Finance, 36(16), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)30029-6
  24. Ibrani, E. Y., Faisal, F., Sukasari, N., & Handayani, Y. D. (2020). Determinants and consequences of internal auditor quality on regional government performance: an empirical investigation in Indonesia. Quality - Access to Success, 21(176), 87–92.
  25. Listiana, H. J., & Praptoyo, S. (2019). Pengaruh karakteristik personal, etika, dan pengalaman audit terhadap kinerja auditor. Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, 7(5), 1–17.
  26. Luthan, E., Ali, S., & Hairaty, E. (2019). The professionalism, competence, organizational commitment & job satisfaction on the performance of auditor. The International Journal of Business Review, 2(2), 89–105.
  27. Muda, I., Erlina, Yahya, I., & Nasution, A. A. (2018). Performance audit and balanced scorecard perspective. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(5), 1321–1333.
  28. Nath, N., Radiah, O., & Laswad, F. (2020). External performance audit in New Zealand Public Health: a legitimacy perspective. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 17(2), 145–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-11-2017-0110
  29. Nehme, R., Alkhoury, C., & Mutawa, A. Al. (2019). Evaluating the performance of auditors: a driver or a stabilizer of auditors’ behaviour of auditors. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 69(9), 1999–2019. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-08-2018-0306
  30. Nolder, C. J., & Kadous, K. (2018). Grounding the professional skepticism construct in mindset and attitude theory: a way forward. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 67, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2018.03.010
  31. Pospisil, R. (2017). Performance audit in public institutions in the Czech Republic. The Audit Financiar Journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, 15(147), 430–439.
  32. Puspitasari, A., Baridwan, Z., & Rahman, A. F. (2019). The effect of audit competence, independence, and professional skeptism on audit quality with auditor’s ethics as moderation variables. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 18(5), 135–144.
  33. Rahardjo, B. T. (2017). The effect of due professional care and motivation on the quality audit Indonesia. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 4(11), 173–182. www.allsubjectjournal.com
  34. Rahmina, L. Y., & Agoes, S. (2014). Influence of auditor independence, audit tenure, and audit fee on audit quality of members of capital market accountant forum in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 164, 324–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.11.083
  35. Rizki, M., & Sudarno. (2020). Pengaruh reputasi KAP, ukuran KAP, dan biaya audit terhadap kualitas audit (studi pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di BEI tahun 2015-2017). Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 9(3), 1–11.
  36. Sitorus, R. R., & Wijaya, L. (2016). Pengaruh profesionalisme dan etika profesi terhadap kinerja auditor dengan struktur audit sebagai pemoderasi. Media Studi Ekonomi, 19(2), 98–119.
  37. Sulistyowati, L., & Supriyati, S. (2016). The effect of experience, competence, independence, and professionalism of auditors on fraud detection. The Indonesian Accounting Review, 5(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.14414/tiar.v5i1.494
  38. Wakil, G. K., Alifiah, M. N., & Teru, P. (2020). Auditor independence and audit quality in Nigeria Public Sector: a critical review. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 839–845. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.153
  39. Xiao, H., & Xi, J. (2021). The Covid-19 and earnings management: China’s evidence. Journal of Accounting and Taxation, 13(2), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.5897/JAT2020.0436
  40. Zahmatkesh, S., & Rezazadeh, J. (2017). The effect of auditor features on audit quality. Tékhne, 15(2), 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tekhne.2017.09.003
  41. Zheng, P., & Ren, C. (2019). Voluntary CSR disclosure, institutional environment, and independent audit demand. China Journal of Accounting Research, 12(4), 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2019.10.002