Article Sidebar

Download
Full Text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 330 Download : 329

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research aims to examine key factors influencing the intention to continuously use e-government systems. An online questionnaire was distributed to 251 users of e-government systems (Jogja Smart Service), and 231 respondents met the criteria. Researchers use PLS-SEM approach to examine the responses. The study found that system quality, service quality, information quality, and trust significantly positively affected user satisfaction. In comparison, self-efficacy has a positive but not significant effect on user satisfaction. Furthermore, user satisfaction significantly positively affects the intention to continue use. The continuous use of an e-Government service is proof of the success of a service. Hence, this paper identifies substantial factors for the continued use of e-government applications. This research modified previous research models by adding the factor of Trust, which is believed to be substantial for the continuous use of e-government systems.

Keywords

Intention to continuously use trust user satisfaction

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Al-Hujran, O., Al-Debei, M.M., Chatfield, A., & Migdadi, M. (2015). The imperative of influencing citizen attitude toward e-government adoption and use. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 189-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.025
  2. Al-rahmi, W. M., Uddin, M., Alkhalaf, S., Al-Dhlan, K. A., Faura, J. C., Al-Rahmi, A. M. & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2022). Validation of an integrated is success model in the study of e-government. Mobile Information Systems.
  3. Alruwaie, M., El-Haddadeh, R., & Weerakkody, V. (2020). Citizens’ continuous use of egovernment services: the role of self-efficacy, outcome expectations and satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101485. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2020.101485.
  4. Alshaher, A. A. (2020). IT capabilities as a fundamental of electronic government system success in developing countries from users perspectives. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy.
  5. Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26, 164-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.06.004.
  6. Alzahrani, L., & Seth, K.P. (2021). Factors influencing students’ satisfaction with continuous use of learning management systems during the COVID-19 pandemic: An empirical study. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 6787 - 6805.
  7. Beştepe, F., & Yildirim, S. O. (2022). Acceptance of IoT-Based and Sustainability-Oriented Smart City Services: A mixed methods study. Sustainable Cities and Society, 80(May). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103794.
  8. Bhattacharjee, S., & Chakrabarti, D. (2015). Indian IT outsourcing industry: Future threats and challenges – a reassessment. Futures 67: 11–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.12.014.
  9. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 25(3): 351–70. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250921.
  10. Choi, K.J., Wang, Y., Sparks, B.A., & Choi, S.M. (2021). Privacy or Security: Does It Matter for Continued Use Intention of Travel Applications? Cornell Hospitality Quarterly.
  11. Choudrie, J., Zamani, E.D., Umeoji, E., & Emmanuel, A. (2017). Implementing E-government in Lagos State: Understanding the impact of cultural perceptions and working practices. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 646-657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.11.004.
  12. Petter, S., DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (1992). Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables. Journal of Management Information Systems, 29, 62 - 7.
  13. DeLone, W.H., & McLean, E.R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst., 19, 9-30.
  14. Diskominfo. (2018a). JSS, satu aplikasi berisi banyak layanan di Kota Yogyakarta. https://republika.co.id/berita/nasional/daerah/18/06/11/pa5lk1399-jss-satu-aplikasi-berisi-banyak-layanan-di-kota-yogyakarta.
  15. _____. (2018b). Pemkot Luncurkan JSS. https://kominfo.jogjakota.go.id/detail/index/17.
  16. _____. (2020). Balai Kota Yogyakarta segera hadir di dunia maya. https://www.tagar.id/balai-kota-yogyakarta-segera-hadir-di-dunia-maya.
  17. Dowling, M., O'Gorman, C., Puncheva, P., & Vanwalleghem, D. (2019). Trust and SME attitudes towards equity financing across Europe. Journal of World Business, 54, 101003.
  18. Glyptis, L., Christofi, M., Vrontis, D., Giudice, M.D., Dimitriou, S., & Michael P. (2020). E-government implementation challenges in small countries: the project manager’s perspective. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152, 1–11.
  19. Gumilang, M., G. (2019). Inovasi pemerintah daerah Jogja Smart Service dalam menciptakan smart and liveable city di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Gama Societa, 3(1) 1–9.
  20. Guo, W., Chen, T., & Luo, Q. (2022). Does modified mobile government satisfy elders needs? An empirical study of China’s Zhejiang and Jiangxi Provinces.” Government Information Quarterly, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101676.
  21. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2): 139–52. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202.
  22. Hooda, A., Gupta, P., Jeyaraj, A., Giannakis, A., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2022). The effects of trust on behavioral intention and use behavior within e-government contexts. International Journal of Information Management, 67(December), 102553. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJINFOMGT.2022.102553.
  23. Jeyaraj, A. (2020). DeLone & McLean models of information system success: critical meta-review and research directions. International Journal of Information Management, 54(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102139.
  24. Kalamatianou, M. A. (2018). A suggested framework for the evaluation of e-government services.
  25. Kaya, B., Abubakar, A. M., Behravesh, E., Yildiz, H., & Mert, I. S. (2020). Antecedents of innovative performance: findings from pls-sem and fuzzy sets (FsQCA). Journal of Business Research, 114, 278–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.04.016.
  26. Khrais, L. T., Abdelwahed, Y. M., & Mahmoud, M. A. (2019). A readiness evaluation of applying e-government in the society: shall citizens begin to use it? International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 10(9).
  27. Li, Y., & Shang, H. (2020). Service quality, perceived value, and citizens’ continuous-use intention regarding e-government: empirical evidence from china. Information & Management, 57(3), 103197. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IM.2019.103197.
  28. Lien, C-H., Wu, J-J., Chien, S-H., Lee, C-Y. (2017). Anxious attachment, relational embeddedness, trust, co-production, and performance: an empirical study in online business-to-business relationships. Telematics and Informatics, 34(8): 1514–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.06.016.
  29. Malik, G., & Rao, A. S. (2019). Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of odr/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy. J. Inf. Technol. Tour. 21,461–82.
  30. Mikalef, P. & Pateli, A. (2017). Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance: findings from PLS-SEM and FsQCA. Journal of Business Research, 70, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.09.004.
  31. Novriando, A. (2020). Efektivitas ‘jogja smart service’ terhadap pelayanan publik di Kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan.
  32. Ofori, K. S., Anyigba, H., Adeola, O., Junwu, C., Osakwe, C. N., & David-West, O. (2021). Understanding post-adoption behaviour in the context of ride-hailing apps: the role of customer perceived value. Information Technology & People.
  33. Oghuma, A. P., Libaque-Saenz, C. F., Wong, S.F., & Chang, Y. (2016). An expectation-confirmation model of continuance intention to use mobile instant messaging. Telematics and Informatics 33 (1): 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TELE.2015.05.006.
  34. Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–69.
  35. Ramayah, T., Ling, N. S., Taghizadeh, S. K., & Rahman, S. A. (2016). Factors influencing SMEs website continuance intention in Malaysia. Telematics and Informatics, 33(1), 150–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.007.
  36. Rochmah, F., Sakir, S & Abhipraya, F. A. (2021). Efektivitas Jogja Smart Service dalam pelayanan kependudukan di tengah pandemi Covid-19. Government: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 14(2), 66–77.
  37. Rooks, G., & Matzat, U. (2010). Cross-national differences in effects of social embeddedness on trust: a comparative study of german and dutch business transactions. The Social Science Journal, 47(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2009.07.001.
  38. Santa, R., MacDonald, J. B., & Ferrer, M. (2019). The role of trust in e-government effectiveness, operational effectiveness and user satisfaction: lessons from Saudi Arabia in E-G2B. Government Information Quarterly, 36(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2018.10.007.
  39. Shiau, W. L., Yuan, Y., Pu, X., Ray, S., & Chen, C. C. (2020). Understanding fintech continuance: perspectives from self-efficacy and ECT-IS theories. Ind. Manag. Data Syst, 120, 1659–89.
  40. Valaei, N., Rezaei, S., & Ismail, W. K. W. (2017). Examining learning strategies, creativity, and innovation at smes using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis and PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, 70, 224–33. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.016.
  41. Wang, Y. S., & Liao, Y. W. (2008). Assessing egovernment systems success: a validation of the DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. Government Information Quarterly, 25(4), 717–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GIQ.2007.06.002.
  42. Warkentin, M., Sharma, S., Gefen, D., Rose, G. M., & Pavlou, P. (2018). Social identity and trust in internet-based voting adoption. Government Information Quarterly, 35(2), 195–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.03.007.
  43. Witarsyah, D., Sjafrizal, T., Fudzee, M. F., & Salamat, M. A. (2017). The critical factors affecting e-government adoption in indonesia: a conceptual framework. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7, 160–67.
  44. Xia, H., Lu, D., Lin, B., Nord, J. H., & Zhang, J. Z. (2022). Trust in fintech: risk, governance, and continuance intention. Journal of Computer Information Systems. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2022.2093295.
  45. Xiang, G., Chen, Q., & Li, Q. C. (2022). How attachment affects users’ continued use intention of tourism mobile platform: a user experience perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13.
  46. Zhang, M., Su, C. Y., Li, Y., & Li, Y. (2020). Factors affecting chinese university students’ intention to continue using virtual and remote labs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 169–85.