Main Article Content


One form of company participation in sustainable development is the preparation of quality reports (SR) taking into account SR content and pressure from stakeholders including the determinants of SR quality in companies listed on the IDX during 2017-2020 with an isomorphism theory approach. The sample for this study was 444 companies using the purposive method, with the criteria for companies compiling SRs during the year of observation either separately or in combination with the annual financial statements. Data analysis with multivariate regression. The results showed that environmental pressure and social pressure coercively isomorphism had an effect on SR quality, and industrial pressure had mimetic isomorphism affected SR quality, while normative pressure from the audit committee had no effect on SR quality because p > 0.05. This study proves that testing the quality of SR with a coercive, mimetic, and normative isomorphism theory approach can determine the quality of SR.


Sustainability Report quality isomorphism stakeholder pressure

Article Details


  1. Adaui, C. R. L. (2020). Sustainability reporting quality of peruvian listed companies and the impact of regulatory requirements of sustainability disclosures. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(3).
  2. Adhariani, D., & du Toit, E. (2020). Readability of sustainability reports: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 10(4), 621–636.
  3. Amran, A., & Haniffa, R. (2011). Evidence in development of sustainability reporting: a case of a developing...: UMUC Library OneSearch: Business & Management. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(3), 141–156. Retrieved from
  4. Badia, F., Bracci, E., & Tallaki, M. (2020). Quality and diffusion of social and sustainability reporting in Italian public utility companies. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(11), 1–17.
  5. Baldini, M., Maso, L. D., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). Role of country- and firm-level determinants in environmental, social, and governance disclosure. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 79–98.
  6. Bansal, P., & DesJardine, M. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78.
  7. Bappenas. (2019). Roadmap of SDGs Indonesia : A Hihglight. 27–36. Retrieved from OF SDGs INDONESIA_final draft.pdf
  8. Buallay, A., & Al-Ajmi, J. (2020). The role of audit committee attributes in corporate sustainability reporting: Evidence from banks in the Gulf Cooperation Council. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 21(2), 249-264.
  9. Busch, T., & Friede, G. (2018). The robustness of the corporate social and financial performance relation: A second-order meta-analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 583–608.
  10. Chen, X., Li, X., & Huang, X. (2022). The impact of corporate characteristics and external pressure on environmental information disclosure: a model using environmental management as a mediator. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(9), 12797–12809.
  11. Correa-Garcia, J. A., Garcia-Benau, M. A., & Garcia-Meca, E. (2020). Corporate governance and its implications for sustainability reporting quality in Latin American business groups. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121142.
  12. Costa, E. (2014). Voluntary Disclosure in a Regulated Context: The Case of Italian Social Enterpris. Accountability and Social Accounting for Social and Non- Profit Organizations.
  13. Del Giudice, A., & Rigamonti, S. (2020). Does audit improve the quality of ESG scores? Evidence from corporate misconduct. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(14).
  14. Dias, C. A., & Basuki, B. (2018). Study of The Determinants Existence of External Assurance on Sustainability Reports in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics Symposium 2018 on Special Session for Indonesian Study (JCAE 2018) - Contemporary Accounting Studies in Indonesia, 16-22.
  15. Dillard, J. P., & Anderson, J. W. (2004). The role of fear in persuasion. Psychology and Marketing, 21(11), 909–926.
  16. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Advances in Strategic Management, 17(2), 143–166.
  17. Dissanayake, D., Kuruppu, S., Qian, W., & Tilt, C. (2020). Barriers for sustainability reporting: evidence from Indo-Pacific region. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(2), 264–293.
  18. Evana, E. (2017). The Effect Of Sustainability Reporting Disclosure Based On Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4 On Company Performance (A Study On Companies Listed In Indonesia Stock Exchange). The Indonesian Journal of Accounting Research, 20(3), 417–442.
  19. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2014). Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53–63.
  20. Gamerschlag, R., M€oller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: Empirical evidence from Germany. Review of Managerial Science, 5(2), 233–262. https://
  21. Hamdani, R., Najamuddin, Y., Haryanto, P. D., & Kholid, M. N. (2020). A comparative study on CSR disclosure between Indonesian Islamic banks and conventional banks: the application of GRI and ISR indexes. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 24(2), 148–158.
  22. Hasan, S., Kassim, A. A. M., & Hamid, M. A. A. (2020). The impact of audit quality, audit committee and financial reporting quality: evidence from Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 10(5), 272.
  23. Khan, H., Bose, S., Mollik, A. T., & Harun, H. (2020). “Green washing” or “authentic effort”? An empirical investigation of the quality of sustainability reporting by banks. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal.
  24. Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2017). Determinants of sustainability reporting and its impact on firm value: Evidence from the emerging market of Turkey. Journal of cleaner production, 143, 27-39.
  25. Landi, G., & Sciarelli, M. (2019). Towards a more ethical market: the impact of ESG rating on corporate financial performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(1), 11–27.
  26. Lenz, R., Sarens, G., & Jeppesen, K. K. (2018). in Search of a Measure of Effectiveness for Internal Audit Functions: an Institutional Perspective. Edpacs, 58(2), 1–36.
  27. Lulu, C. L. (2020). Stakeholder Pressure and the Quality Of Sustainability Report: Evidence From Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi, Kewirausahaan, Dan Teknologi Finansial, 2(1).
  28. Manning, B., Braam, G., & Reimsbach, D. (2019). Corporate governance and sustainable business conduct—Effects of board monitoring effectiveness and stakeholder engagement on corporate sustainability performance and disclosure choices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 351–366.
  29. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
  30. Michelon, G., Patten, D. M., & Romi, A. M. (2019). Creating Legitimacy for Sustainability Assurance Practices: Evidence from Sustainability Restatements. In European Accounting Review (Vol. 28).
  31. Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59–78.
  32. Nasution, R. M., & Adhariani, D. (2016). Simbolis Atau Substantif? Analisis Praktik Pelaporan Csr Dan Kualitas Pengungkapan. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 13(1), 23–51.
  33. OJK RI. (2017). Peraturan OJK Nomor 51/POJK.03/2017 Tentang Penerapan Keuangan Berkelanjutan Bagi Lembaga Jasa keuangan, Emiten, dan Perusahaan Publik.
  34. Qisthi, F., & Fitri, M. (2020). Pengungkapan Laporan Keberlanjutan Berdasarkan Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) G4. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Akuntansi (JIMEKA), 5(4), 469–484.
  35. Rehman, Z. U., Zahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Asif, M., Alharthi, M., Irfan, M., & Glowacz, A. (2020). Do corporate social responsibility disclosures improve financial performance? A perspective of the Islamic banking industry in Pakistan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8).
  36. RI. (2007). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Retrieved from
  37. RI. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 47 Tahun 2012 tentang Tanggung Jawab Sosial dan Lingkungan Perseroan Terbatas.
  38. Rudyanto, A., & Siregar, S. V. (2018). The effect of stakeholder pressure and corporate governance on the sustainability report quality. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 34(2), 233–249.
  39. Sjåfjell, B. (2016). Achieving corporate sustainability: What is the role of the shareholder? Hanne Birkmose, Shareholders’ Duties in Europe (Kluwer Law International, 2017)., 377–404.
  40. Tang, Y., Sun, M., Ma, W., & Bai, S. (2020). The External Pressure, Internal Drive and Voluntary Carbon Disclosure in China. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 56(14), 3367–3382.
  41. Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Furlotti, K. (2020). The materiality assessment and stakeholder engagement: A content analysis of sustainability reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 470–484.
  42. Vadasi, C., Bekiaris, M., & Andrikopoulos, A. (2020). Corporate governance and internal audit: an institutional theory perspective. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 20(1), 175–190.
  43. Venturelli, A., Caputo, F., Cosma, S., Leopizzi, R., & Pizzi, S. (2017). Directive 2014/95/EU: Are Italian companies already compliant? Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(8).
  44. Venturelli, A., Caputo, F., Leopizzi, R., & Pizzi, S. (2019). The state of art of corporate social disclosure before the introduction of non-financial reporting directive: a cross country analysis. Social Responsibility Journal, 15(4), 409–423.
  45. Zahid, M., Rahman, H. U., Khan, M., Ali, W., & Shad, F. (2020). Addressing endogeneity by proposing novel instrumental variables in the nexus of sustainability reporting and firm financial performance: A step-by-step procedure for non-experts. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3086–3103.