Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 312 Download : 741

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper aims to investigate and describe how the practice of sharing system is applied in one of Indonesia’s well-known and largest indigenous restaurant chains. The research applies a case study method. It is focused only on a single company with around two hundred branches nationwide. The data were mainly collected by deep interviews and observations. All data are analysed qualitatively. An interactive model as suggested by Miles and Huberman (1994) is adopted. The study found that this company has a very distinctive method not only for its financial matters, but also the operations in general. The operations seem to apply the mixed musharaka and mudharaba principles; although the Islamic term is hardly used, the values applied are Islamic in nature. The business model can offer widely that there is another model of business which promises the power of sharing among the participants.

Keywords

Sharing qualitative innovative financing Minang

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Abdullah, T. (1966). Adat and Islam: An examination of conflict in Minangkabau. Indonesia, 2, 1–24.
  2. Adnan, M. A. (1988). The Entrepreneurship as an Alternative. Jurnal UNISIA, 10(2).
  3. Adnan, M. A. (1996). An investigation of accounting concepts and practices in Islamic banks: The cases of Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad and Bank Muamalat Indonesia.
  4. Alfurqan, A. (2020). Evolution and modernization of Islamic education in Minangkabau. Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies, 16(1), 82–98.
  5. Armiati, A., Effendi, Z. M., & Efi, A. (2019). Internalizing the value of Minangkabau culture in economic learning. 2nd Padang International Conference on Education, Economics, Business and Accounting (PICEEBA-2 2018), 776–783.
  6. Basri, Y. Z., & Arafah, W. (2023). Determinant of Interest in Paying Zakat with Age as a Moderating Variable (Study on Minang Society). APTISI Transactions on Management (ATM), 7(2), 92–104.
  7. CNN. (2017, July). World’s 50 best foods: Reader’s choice | CNN. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/world-best-foods-readers-choice/index.html
  8. Errington, F. K. (1984). Manners and Meaning in West Sumatra: The Social Context of Consciousness.
  9. Games, D., Soutar, G., & Sneddon, J. (2013). Entrepreneurship, values, and Muslim values: Some insights from Minangkabau entrepreneurs. International Journal of Social Entrepreneurship and Innovation 4, 2(4), 361–373.
  10. Games, D., Soutar, G., & Sneddon, J. (2021). Personal values and SME innovation in a Muslim ethnic group in Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, 13(5), 1012–1032.
  11. Hastuti, P. C., Thoyib, A., Troena, E. A., & Setiawan, M. (2015). The Minang Entrepreneur Characteristic. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 211, 819–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.108
  12. Jensen, C., & Meckling, H. (1976). Theory of Firm: Managerial Bahavior, agency Costs, and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3.
  13. Klopfer, L. (1993). Padang restaurants: Creating “ethnic” cuisine in Indonesia. Food and Foodways, 5(3), 293–304.
  14. Mardatillah, A. (2020). The enterprise culture heritage of Minangkabau cuisine, West Sumatra of Indonesia as a source of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 7(1), 34.
  15. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
  16. Munir, M., Mustansyir, R., & Rumambo Pandin, M. G. (2020). The Minang restaurant business ethics: A case study in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Opción: Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 91 (April), 1141–1174.
  17. Naim, M. (1993). Sistem Pengelolaan Restoran Minang Sebuah Prototype Sistem Ekonomi Kekeluargaan. Universitas Andalas.
  18. Naim, M., Paragoan, W., Asril, Z., & Rasyid, F. (1987). Jurus manajemen Indonesia: Sistem pengelolaan restoran Minang : sebuah prototip sistem ekonomi Pancasila (Ed. 1). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  19. Nastitie, D. P. (2018, September 7). Presiden IOC Thomas Bach Suka Rendang. Kompas.Id. https://www.kompas.id/baca/nama-peristiwa/2018/09/07/presiden-ioc-thomas-bach-suka-rendang
  20. Navis, A. A. (1986). Alam Takambang Jadi Guru, Adat dan Kebudayaan Minangkau. Jakarta: Pustaka Grafitipers.
  21. Nurmufida, M., Wangrimen, G. H., Reinalta, R., & Leonardi, K. (2017). Rendang: The treasure of minangkabau. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 4(4), 232–235.
  22. Sugiyono, S. (2014). Metode Penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  23. Suri, R. A. (2015). Rendang: Minang legacy to the world. Afterhours Books.
  24. Zacharakis, A., & Bygrave, W. D. (2019). Entrepreneurship. John Wiley & Sons.