Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 624 Download : 144

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The public expectation gap is an issue that is often discussed in the management of privilege funds. The public expectation that privilege funds can be used to finance various sectors is one of the gaps in expectations. Trust is key in synergizing or connecting the state, government and society. However, the discrepancy between public expectations and the existing conditions for managing the privilege fund is one of the causes of the expectation gap. This prompted this study to analyze the factors of the expectation gap that affect the level of public trust in the management of privilege funds. This research uses a quantitative approach with descriptive content analysis. The object of research is people who live in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. Data sources came from respondents through offline and online questionnaires. The analytical tool relies on SmartPLS 4.0, this refers to the number of samples used is not large but the model built is complex. The findings show that the public expectation gap affects the decline in the level of public trust. This research is expected to help identify problems that arise due to a mismatch between expectations and reality. So that it can restore public confidence that tends to feel disappointed and grow suspicion in the implementation of privilege fund activities. With the improvement or adjustment of policies that are more in line with public expectations, the public will feel more valued and recognized. This can increase public participation in planning, monitoring and program implementation. So that it will not lead to a crisis of legitimacy for the concept of privilege itself.

Keywords

Privilege funds expectation gap public trust

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Andhika, L. R. (2018). Meningkatkan Kepercayaan Publik Terhadap Pemerintah Melalui Redesain Proses Kebijakan. JIP (Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan) : Kajian Ilmu Pemerintahan Dan Politik Daerah, 3(1), 24-42. doi:https://doi.org/10.24905/jip.3.1.2018.24-42
  2. Angel, J. F., Blackwell, R. D., & Miniard, P. W. (1990). Consumer Behavior 6th ed. Chicago: The Dryden Press.
  3. Anwarudin, A. (2018). Pengaruh Good Governance, Pengelolaan Keuangan Daerah, Sistem Akuntansi Keuangan Daerah Dan Sistem Pengendalian Intern Terhadap Kinerja Pemerintah Daerah (Studi Empiris Pada Organisasi Perangkat Daerah Kabupaten Banjarnegara). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.
  4. Astuti, F. (2022). Kontribusi Dana Keistimewaan Dalam Rangka Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat (Penelitian Deskriptif di Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta). Yogyakarta: Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa "APMD".
  5. Basri, M., & Arsal, R. (2022). Pengaruh Efektivitas Dan Efisiensi Kerja Pegawai Terhadap Kinerja Organisasi Dinas Sosial Kota Kendari. Journal Publicuho, 5(4), 1127-1138.
  6. Brunk, C. G. (2006). Public knowledge, public trust: understanding the 'knowledge deficit'. Public Genet. 9(3), 178-183. doi:10.1159/000092654. PMID: 16741347.
  7. Chakravartty, S. (2018, Juni 12). Expectancy Disconfirmation Theory. Retrieved from Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/expectancy-disconfirmation-theory-sandeep-chakravartty/
  8. Cook, F. L. (2010). Trusting What You Know: Information, Knowledge,. Journal of Politics Vol. 72 No. 2 (2010), 397-412.
  9. DPRD. (2023, April 14). Laporan Realisasi Dana Keistimewaan Tahun Anggaran 2022. Retrieved from e-Parlemen DPRD Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta: https://www.dprd-diy.go.id/laporan-realisasi-dana-keistimewaan-tahun-anggaran-2022/
  10. Efendi, D. H. (2022). Pengaruh Kinerja Organisasi Dan Inovasi Pemerintah Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat Terhadap Kepercayaan Masyarakat Melalui Kepuasan Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Pada Dinas Kependudukan dan Pencatatan Sipil Kabupaten Banyuwangi). Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember.
  11. Expectation Theory. (2000). In P. Swamidass, Encyclopedia of Production and Manufacturing Management. (p. 197). Boston, MA: Springer.
  12. Fachriza R, M., Syahfadillah, M., Hoetomo, Y. T., & Saputra, R. (2015). Tingkat Kepuasan Masyarakat Tangerang Selatan terhadap KinerjaPemerintah Daerah dalam Periode Kepemimpinan Hj. AirinRachmidiany SH MH. Jakarta: Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta.
  13. Fauziah, R., Mulyana, N., & Raharjo, S. T. (2015). Pengetahuan Masyarakat Desa Tentang Kesetaraan Gender. Prosiding Penelitian & Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 147-300.
  14. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  15. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial Least Squares Konsep Teknik dan Aplikasi dengan Program Smart PLS 3.0. Semarang: Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
  16. Gibb, J. R. (1972). Tori Theory: Nonverbal Behavior and the Experience of Public. Comparative Group Studies, 3(4), 461-472.
  17. Henseler, J., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Goodness-of-Fit Indices for Partial Least Squares Path Modeling. Computational Statistics, 565-580.
  18. Hermawati, D. T. (2016). Analisis Kebijakan Program Penanggulangan Kemiskinan Wilayah Pesisir Kabupaten Sidoarjo. Jurnal Ilmiah Sosio Agribisnis, 16(1). doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.30742/jisa1612016372
  19. Idris, H. (2020). Transparansi Informasi Meningkatkan Level. BIJAC: Bata Ilyas Journal of Accounting , 65-72.
  20. Inspektorat. (2023, May 31). Sosialisasi Pengelolaan BKK Dana Keistimewaan DIY Tahun 2023. Retrieved from Inspektorat DIY: https://inspektorat.jogjaprov.go.id/2023/05/31/sosialisasi-pengelolaan-bkk-dana-keistimewaan-diy-tahun-2023/
  21. Janah, N. (2020). Pengaruh Tingkat Pengetahuan dan Kepercayaan Nasabah Terhadap Minat Menabung di Bank Syariah. Metro: IAIN Metro.
  22. Kemenkeu. (n.d.). Dana Keistimewaan DIY. Retrieved from Kementerian Keuangan Direktorat Jenderal Perimbangan Keuangan: https://djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/?ufaq=untuk-apa-saja-dana-keistimewaan-diy-digunakan
  23. Koh, H. C., & Woo, E.-S. (1998). The expectation gap in auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal 13/3, 147-154.
  24. Kotler, P. (2003). Manajemen Pemasaran: Analisis, Perencanaan, Implementasi dan. Jakarta: PT. Prehalindo.
  25. Kreastiawan, L. (2015). Pengaruh Penerapan Anggaran Berbasis Kinerja Terhadap Akuntabilitas Kinerja Instansi Pemerintah (Studi Empiris Pada SKPD Kabupaten Ponorogo). Ponorogo: Universitas Muhammadiyah Ponorogo.
  26. Kurnia, N. (2013). Penggunaan Expectancy Theory Dalam Upaya Mengukur Motivasi Kerja Karyawan Di Pdam X. Jurnal Teknik Industri FT USU Vol 3, No. 1, 36-40.
  27. Liggio, C. D. (1974). The Expectation Gap The Accountant Waterloo. Journal of Contemporary Business, 3, 27-44.
  28. Mandasari, Z. (2020, Desember 2). Keterbukaan Informasi Publik dan Percepatan Reformasi Birokrasi. Retrieved from Ombudsman Republik Indonesia: https://ombudsman.go.id/pengumuman/r/artikel--keterbukaan-informasi-publik-dan-percepatan-reformasi-birokrasi---
  29. Mufidta, F., & Urumsah, D. (2024). Determinan kesenjangan ekspektasi terhadap tingkat kepercayaan masyarakat pada pengelolaandana keistimewaan: Model konseptual. Proceeding Of National Conference On Accounting & Finance, 231-240.
  30. Outley, D. (1995). Management Control, Organization Design and Accounting Information System. United Kingdom: Prentice Hall.
  31. Patterson, P. &. (1993). Diskonfirmasi harapan dan model kesenjangan kualitas layanan: Sebuah paradigma terpadu. Jurnal Kepuasan, Ketidakpuasan dan Perilaku Mengeluh , 6 (1), 90-99.
  32. Rahmat, M. (2013). Customer Trust as Relationship Mediation Between Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty At Bank Rakyat Indonesia (BRI) Southeast Sulawesi. The International Journal Of Engineering And Science (IJES), ISSN(e): 2319 – 1813 ISSN, 2319-1805.
  33. Ramadhony, R., & Hadiprajitno, P. (2015, Juli). Pengaruh Pengetahuan Dan Ekspektasi Masyarakat Terhadap Kesenjangan Persepsi Audit Pemerintahan. Diponegoro Journal of Accounting, 46-58.
  34. Rangga, D., Obon, W., & Dunggun, J. Y. (2020). Analisis Kesenjangan Antara Ekspetasi Dan Persepsi Layanan Kunjungan Warga Binaan Pemasyarakatan Di Rumah Tahanan Negara Maumere. Jurnal Ilmiah Projemen, 7(1).
  35. Ratnasari, D. (2015, Maret 4). Pengaruh Tingkat Ekspektasi Dan Kinerja Pelayanan Terhadap Tingkat Kepuasan Masyarakat Melalui Diskonfirmasi Sebagai Variabel Intervening (Studi Pada Dinas Kependudukan Dan Catatan Sipil Kota Surabaya). Retrieved Mei 2023, from Repository unair: http://repository.unair.ac.id/id/eprint/17589
  36. Ryzin, G. G. (2006, October). Testing the Expectancy Disconfirmation Model of Citizen Satisfaction with Local Government. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(4), 599-611. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui058
  37. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research Methods for Business Students (8th Edition ed.). New York: Pearson.
  38. Setyorini, D. (2005). Evaluasi Empiris Terhadap Persepsi Pemakai Atas Bentuk Laporan Audit yang Berubah. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 97-116.
  39. Shmueli, G., Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Cheah, J.-H., Ting, H., Vaithikingam, S., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Predictive model assessment in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using PLSpredict. European Journal of Marketing.
  40. Soetanto, J. (2017). Pengaruh Kepercayaan, Kemudahan, Kualitas Informasi Dan Persepsi Resiko Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Melalui Situs Jejaring Sosial di Semarang. Semarang: Unika Soegijapranata Semarang.
  41. Sreejesh, S., Mohapatra, S., & Anusree, M. (2014). Business Research Methods: An Applied Orientation. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  42. Susliyanti, E., & Binawati, E. (2020). Pengaruh Akuntabilitas Keuangan Dan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Terhadap Kepercayaan Dan Kepuasan Masyarakat Atas Penggunaan Dana Desa. EFEKTIF Jurnal Bisnis Dan Ekonomi, 11(1), 1-12.
  43. Tantri, S. N., Nusa, N. D., & Pranadya, R. (2020). Kesenjangan Ekspektasi-Kinerja Dalam Keterampilan Umum Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance, 1(1), 1-13.
  44. Victor, H. V. (1964). Work and motivation. San Francisco: CA: Jossey-Bass.
  45. Wardidin, A. (2015). Pengaruh Tingkat Kepercayaan Masyarakat kepada Kepala Desa terhadap Partisipasi Politik. Lampung: Universitas Lampung.
  46. wbna. (2012, November 21). Ekspektasi Masyarakat Selalu Lebih Besar Dari Apa Yang Telah Dilakukan Pemerintah. Retrieved from Pemerintah Kota Banda Aceh: https://bandaacehkota.go.id/berita/4140/ekspektasi-masyarakat-selalu-lebih-besar-dari-apa-yang-telah-dilakukan-pemerintah-2.html
  47. Widayat, W. (2022, 12 28). Efektivitas Danais Demi Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. (H. DIY, Interviewer)
  48. Winkel, W. (1997). Bimbingan Konseling di Lingkungan Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
  49. Yüksel, A., & Yüksel, F. (2001). The Expectancy-Disconfirmation Paradigm: A Critique. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 25(2), 107-131. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/109634800102500201
  50. Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N., & Walker, R. M. (2021). The Expectancy-Disconfirmation Model and Citizen Satisfaction with Public Services: A Meta-analysis and an Agenda for Best Practice. Public Administration ReviewJilid 82, Edisi 1, 147-159.