Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 7 Download : 16

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This quantitative study analyzes the effect of utilizing information technology, government internal control system, and performance-based budgeting on government agency performance accountability with organizational commitment as moderating variable. From the population of State Civil Apparatus (ASN) within all Regional Apparatus Organizations (OPD) of Pekalongan City in 2023, 350 respondents were selected as sample using convenience sampling. The type of data collected is primary data obtained through questionnaires. Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Square (SEM-PLS) is the data analysis method. This study shows that utilizing information technology, government internal control system, and performance-based budgeting positively and significantly affect government agency performance accountability. Meanwhile, organizational commitment does not moderate the effect of utilizing information technology, government internal control system, and performance-based budgeting on government agency performance accountability.

Keywords

Information Technology Government Internal Control System Performance-Based Budgeting Organizational Commitment Performance Accountability

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Abdul, H., & Iqbal, M. (2012). Manajemen keuangan daerah (Edisi ketiga). UPP AMP YKPN.
  2. Aliffandi, W., Yusrianti, H., & Yuniarti, E. (2023). The effect of information technology moderation on relationship planning, implementation, reporting, budget evaluation on performance accountability. I-FINANCE: Research Journal on Islamic Finance, 9(1), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.19109/ifinance.v9i1.18440
  3. Andrades, F. J., Martínez-Martínez, D., & Jorge, M. (2021). Corporate governance disclosures by Spanish universities: How different variables can affect the level of such disclosures? Meditari Accountancy Research, 29, 86–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-02-2020-0766
  4. Anthoni, L., Yusuf, & Suherman, A. (2023). The role of information technology and internal control systems in realizing accountability and transparency based on ISAK 35 and its impact on perceptions of sustainability of entity activities. ProBisnis: Jurnal Manajemen, 14(3), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.62398/probis.v14i3.199
  5. Asmawanti, D., Sari, A. M., Fitranita, V., & Wijayanti, I. O. (2020). Dimensi akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah. Journal of Applied Accounting and Taxation, 5(1), 85–94. https://doi.org/10.30871/jaat.v5i1.1850
  6. Aziz, M. A. A., Rahman, H. A., Alam, Md. M., & Said, J. (2015). Enhancement of the accountability of public sectors through integrity system, internal control system and leadership practices: A review study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 28, 163–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01096-5
  7. Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan (BPKP). (2005). Pedoman penyusunan anggaran berbasis kinerja (Revisi). Jakarta.
  8. Bianchi, C. (2010). Improving performance and fostering accountability in the public sector through system dynamics modelling: From an “external” to an “internal” perspective. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 27(4), 361–384. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.1038
  9. Brahmana, H. D., Maksum, A., & Keulana, E. (2020). The effect of implementation of performance budget and internal control on performance accountability with information system as a moderating variable in vertical hospital. International Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting and Finance (IJBAF), 15(1), 274–282.
  10. Budiana, D. A., Said, D., & Nursini. (2019). The effect of village device competencies and internal control system on accountability of village management. Scientific Research Journal, VII(I). https://doi.org/10.31364/scirj/v7.i1.2019.p0119599
  11. Cinquini, L., Mauro, S. G., & Pianezzi, D. (2017). The illusion of new public management? An analysis of performance-based budgeting in the public sector. Proceedings of Pragmatic Constructivism, 6(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.7146/propracon.v6i1.25144
  12. Darwin, K. (2021). Performance accountability through internal control system and reporting system. Point of View Research Accounting and Auditing, 2(3), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.47090/povraa.v2i3.160
  13. Fauzi, A. R. (2017). Pengaruh anggaran berbasis kinerja terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah dengan komitmen organisasi sebagai variabel moderating (studi kasus SKPD Kota Mojokerto). Unpublished undergraduate thesis, Universitas Airlangga.
  14. Gabriel, A. G. (2017). Transparency and accountability in local government: Levels of commitment of municipal councillors in Bongabon in the Philippines. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 39(3), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2017.1368902
  15. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares: Konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan smartPLS 3.0 (Edisi ke-9). Universitas Diponegoro.
  16. Handayani, D., Yudianto, I., & Afiah, N. N. (2020). The influence of internal control system, information technology utilization, and organizational commitment on government accountability performance. Journal of Accounting Auditing and Business, 3(2), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.24198/jaab.v3i2.26120
  17. Hariani, S. (2020). The impact of human resources, information technology utilization and public accountability on the financial reporting quality. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 22(1), 17–22.
  18. Harianto, D., Kennedy, & Zarefar, A. (2021). Pengaruh kejelasan sasaran anggaran, pengendalian akuntansi, sistem pelaporan dan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah daerah (studi pada organisasi perangkat daerah Kabupaten Rokan Hilir). Jurnal Aplikasi Akuntansi, 6(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.29303/jaa.v6i1.111
  19. Hartono, Y., & Murniati, M. P. (2020). Goal setting theory: The effect of incentive moderation on individual performance. Research in Management and Accounting, 3(2), 94–106. https://doi.org/10.33508/rima.v3i2.3053
  20. Hayat, A. (2017). Organizational commitment antecedent and its effect on managerial performance in public sector budgeting. International Journal of Administrative Science and Organization, 23(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.20476/jbb.v23i1.7451
  21. Hijal-moghrabi, I. (2017). The current practice of performance-based budgeting in the largest U.S. cities: An innovation theory perspective. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(4), 652–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2017.1313168
  22. Irvan, N., Mus, A. R., Su’un, M., & Sufri, M. (2017). Effect of human resource competencies, information technology and internal control systems on good governance and local government financial management performance. IRA-International Journal of Management & Social Sciences, 8(1), 31–45. https://doi.org/10.21013/jmss.v8.n1.p4
  23. Israr, N. H., & Syofyan, E. (2022). Pengaruh penerapan anggaran berbasis kinerja dan penerapan good governance terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. Jurnal Eksplorasi Akuntansi, 4(4), 686–697. https://doi.org/10.24036/jea.v4i4.550
  24. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718812602
  25. Julia, D. A., & Wahidahwati. (2020). Pengaruh sistem akuntansi pemerintah daerah, pengendalian intern, dan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 9(3), 1–23. http://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/2815/2825
  26. Julita & Susilatri. (2018). Analysis of factor affecting the quality of government financial report Bengkalis Regency. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7(2), 157–164.
  27. Karunia, R. L., & Heryani, D. F. (2021). The effect of internal control on performance accountability in the main secretariat of Indonesian institute of science. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Administration Science 2020 (ICAS 2020), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210629.013
  28. Kewo, C. L. (2017). The influence of internal control implementation and managerial performance on financial accountability local government in Indonesia. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(1), 293–297. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/3509
  29. Kharisma, P. I., Rahayu, S., & Yudi. (2021). The effect of budget target clarity, internal control on the performance accountability of the Jambi City Government with organizational commitment as a moderating variable. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Universitas Jambi, 6(2), 126–135. https://doi.org/10.22437/jaku.v6i2.14278
  30. Latham, G. P. (2004). The motivational benefits of goal-setting. The Academy of Management, 18(4), 126–129. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4166132
  31. Liu, O. L. (2011). Outcomes assessment in higher education: Challenges and future research in the context of voluntary system of accountability. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(3), 2–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2011.00206.x
  32. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 480-483. https://doi.org/10.2307/258875
  33. Mahmudi. 2016. Akuntansi sektor publik. UII Press.
  34. Mohamed, A. I., & Sheikh-Ali, A. Y. (2014). Assessing the financial accountability of the Somali federal government organizations. Public Policy and Administration Research, 4(2), 61–66. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/PPAR/article/view/11088
  35. Muhtar, Arifin, T., & Sutaryo. (2021). Performance accountability in Indonesian local governments: Does monitoring really work? International Journal of Business and Society, 22(3), 1673–1692. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4329.2021
  36. Mukyala, V., Juma, B., Maureen, B., Zainabu, T., & Lasuli, B. (2017). Accountability of local government authorities: A developing economy perspective. African Journal of Business Management, 11(12), 266–274. https://doi.org/10.5897/ajbm2017.8326
  37. Norawati, S., Syafrizal, Zulher, & Asmara, C. (2022). Analysis of commitment and work culture on the performance of employees of PT. Agung Toyota Pekanbaru. MENARA Ilmu, 16(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.31869/mi.v16i2.3797
  38. PANRB. (2022). Rata-rata nilai SAKIP RB meningkat, bukti keseriusan reformasi birokrasi. PANRB. https://menpan.go.id/site/berita-terkini/rata-rata-nilai-sakip-rb-meningkat-bukti-keseriusan-reformasi-birokrasi
  39. Papenfus, U., & Schaefer, C. (2010). Improving public accountability by aligning reporting to organizational changes in public service provision – an empirical internet study of all Austrian, German and Swiss towns and states from an agency-theory perspective. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 76(3), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852310372451
  40. Pattinaja, E. M., Lenggono, T. O., Wattimury, J. S., & Apituley, R. (2023). The influence of budgeting participation, organizational culture and locus of control on performance accountability: A case study in Maluku Province Government. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(01), 218–225. http://ejournal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Ekonomi
  41. Pertiwi, R. U., & Utami, E. R. (2020). Pengaruh sistem pengendalian intern dan ketaatan pada peraturan perundangan dengan komitmen organisasi sebagai variabel moderasi. Proceeding of National Conference on Accounting & Finance, 2, 98–118. https://doi.org/10.20885/ncaf.vol2.art9
  42. Rakhma, S. Y., & Sulistyowati, E. (2021). Sistem pengendalian internal, kejelasan sasaran anggaran, pemanfaatan teknologi informasi terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 10(8), 1–22. http://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/4133
  43. Ratmono, D., & Suryani, R. (2016). Anteseden dan konsekuensi keberhasilan implementasi performance-based bufgeting pada pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 20(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol20.iss1.art2
  44. Rizky, R. A., & Noviyana, S. (2022). Effect of e-government and internal control system on performance accountability. Primanomics: Jurnal Ekonomi & Bisnis, 20(3), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.31253/pe.v20i3.1470
  45. Robinson, M., & Last, D. (2009). A basic model of performance-based budgeting. IMF Technical Notes and Manuals 2009/001.
  46. Safaruddin & Basri, S. (2016). Pengaruh penerapan anggaran berbasis kinerja terhadap akuntabilitas publik pada instansi pemerintah (studi pada badan pengelola keuangan dan aset daerah Kota Kendari). Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 5(1), 93–105. http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/jak-uho/article/view/2026
  47. Safryani, S., & Masdjojo, G. N. (2022). Pengaruh penganggaran berbasis kinerja, komitmen organisasi terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja dengan kompetensi aparatur sebagai variabel moderating (studi kasus pada pemerintah Kota Pekalongan). SEIKO: Journal of Management & Business, 4(3), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.37531/sejaman.v4i3.2535
  48. Saputra, G. R. (2021). Influence of human resource competence, internal control system, participation in budget preparation, and accounting control on performance accountability of local government agencies. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 201, 197–203. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.211225.028
  49. Selviani, D. (2020). Pengaruh penerapan anggaran berbasis kinerja terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi Pemerintah Kota Cimahi. LAND Journal, 1(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.47491/landjournal.v1i2.703
  50. Simanjuntak, A., Siahaan, S. B., Situmorang, D. R., & Elisabeth, D. M. (2023). Factors affecting accountability government institution performance. Accounting Analysis Journal, 12(2), 112–122. https://doi.org/10.15294/aaj.v12i2.61983
  51. Sofyani, H., & Prayudi, M. A. (2018). Implementasi anggaran berbasis kinerja di pemerintah daerah dengan akuntabilitas kinerja “A”. Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Bisnis, 13(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.24843/JIAB.2018.v13.i01.p06
  52. Sofyani, H., Riyadh, H. A., & Fahlevi, H. (2020). Improving service quality, accountability and transparency of local government: The intervening role of information technology governance. Cogent Business and Management, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2020.1735690
  53. Soleman, R., Soleman, R., & Zainuddin. (2019). Penerapan sistem akuntansi pemerintah daerah, kualitas sistem pengendalian intern dan pemanfaatan teknologi informasi terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. Hibualamo: Seri Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dan Kependidikan, 3(1), 31–37. https://journal.unhena.ac.id/index.php/sosialkependidikan/article/view/39
  54. Sunjoyo, R. S., Carolina, V., Magdalena, N., & Kurniawan, A. (2017). Aplikasi SPSS untuk smart riset. Alfabeta.
  55. Suwanda, D. (2019). Manajemen risiko. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
  56. Suwanda, D., Moenek, R., Lukman, S., & Syaifullah, M. (2021). The implementation of performance-based budgeting through a money follow program in impressing budget corruption. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 21(2), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v21i2.1576
  57. Telabah, I. W. S., Hermanto, & Handajani, L. (2018). Implementation of performance accountability system for government institution (SAKIP): Determinants and consequence in local government. International Business and Accounting Research Journal, 2(2), 87–102. https://dx.doi.org/10.15294/ibarj.v2i2.36
  58. Tetteh, S., Wu, C., Sungu, L. J., Opata, C. N., & Agyapong, G. N. Y. A. (2019). Relative impact of differences in job security on performance among local government employees: The moderation of affective commitments. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 29(5), 413–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2019.1675980
  59. Wardani, N. D., & Silvia, D. (2021). Anggaran terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah pada lembaga penjaminan mutu pendidikan (LPMP) Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi Unsurya, 6(1), 47–56. https://doi.org/10.35968/jbau.v6i1.625
  60. Wibisono, S., & Riharjo, I. B. (2016). Pengaruh penerapan anggaran berbasis kinerja terhadap akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Akuntansi, 5(9), 1–22. http://jurnalmahasiswa.stiesia.ac.id/index.php/jira/article/view/2236
  61. Williams, B. K., & Sawyer, S. C. (2007). Using information technology: A practical introduction to the world of computers and communications (7th ed). McGraw-Hill Irwin.
  62. Yesyan, A., Mangantar, M., & Tulung, J. E. (2021). The effect of performance-based regional expenditure revenue budget and good government governance on performance accountability of local government institutions in Tambrauw Regency, West Papua Province. International Journal on Economics, Finance and Sustainable Development, 3(6), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.31149/ijefsd.v3i6.1999
  63. Yuditiya, A. I., Rahayu, S., & Tiswiyanti, W. (2023). Kompetensi SDM, pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan SPIP terhadap kualitas laporan keuangan pemerintah Kota Jambi: Komitmen organisasi sebagai pemoderasi. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan (JAK), 11(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.29103/jak.v11i2.12253
  64. Yusuf, M. (2021). The impact of local government accounting systems and performance-based budgeting on local government performance accountability. Jurnal Economic Resource, 3(2), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.33096/jer.v3i2.741
  65. Zhang, Y., & Liao, Y. (2011). Participatory budgeting in local government participatory budgeting in local government evidence. Public Performance and Management Review, 35(2), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576350203
  66. Zulfaidah, Bachtiar, I. H., & Nursyam. (2020). Utilization of information technology and internal control systems on accountability of procurement of goods and government services. Business and Entrepreneurial Review, 20(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.25105/ber.v20i1.6942