Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 9 Download : 4

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Tax compliance remains challenging for the government due to the interconnection of economic, social, cultural, and perceptual elements that harm taxpayer behavior. This study aims to investigate the influence of behavioral drivers on tax compliance, focusing on attitudes and moral principles as mediators. A quantitative technique was used to survey 265 taxpayers in Riau Islands Province. Structural equation modeling (SEM-PLS) was used to investigate relationship between variables. The results demonstrate BC exerts a direct and significant influence on MV and ATT, while also exhibiting a positive correlation in bootstrapping tests or via the median variable with TC. The correlation between BC and TC is statistically insignificant. This result is noteworthy, as the cognitive dimensions of tax behavior—specifically morality and attitude—are more significant in influencing taxpayer behavior regarding tax compliance levels. It is crucial to highlight subjective perceptions in creating a favorable environment for taxpayers. This research theoretically enhances behavioral-based tax compliance model by incorporating psychological and ethical aspects. The findings indicate that tax authorities should formulate policies and campaigns that foster positive attitudes and improve moral responsibility, alongside traditional law enforcement, to augment voluntary compliance and fortify the tax system.

Keywords

Finance Tax Behavioral Control Moral Value Attitude Tax Compliance

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  2. Allingham, M. G., & Sandmo, A. (1972). Income tax evasion: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Public Economics, 1(3–4), 323–338.
  3. Alm, J. (2019). What motivates tax compliance? Journal of Economic Surveys, 33(2), 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12272
  4. Bakija, J. (2024). The US individual income tax: Recent evolution and evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38(3), 33–60. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.38.3.33
  5. Bobek, D. D., & Hatfield, R. C. (2003). An investigation of the theory of planned behavior and the role of moral obligation in tax compliance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 15(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2003.15.1.13
  6. Bobek, D. D., Roberts, R. W., & Sweeney, J. T. (2007). The social norms of tax compliance: evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 49–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9219-x
  7. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295–336.
  8. Cohen, J. (1998). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (1st Editio). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
  9. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. In Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 3rd ed. Sage Publications, Inc.
  10. Cummings, R. G., Martinez-Vazquez, J., McKee, M., & Torgler, B. (2009). Tax morale affects tax compliance: Evidence from surveys and an artefactual field experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 70(3), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.02.010
  11. Feld, L. P., & Frey, B. S. (2007). Tax compliance as the result of a psychological tax contract: The role of incentives and responsive regulation. Law & Policy, 29(1), 102–120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2007.00248.x
  12. Fellner, G., Sausgruber, R., & Traxler, C. (2013). Testing enforcement strategies in the field: Threat, moral appeal and social information. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(3), 634–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeea.12013
  13. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  14. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & G. Kuppelwieser, V. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  15. Hallsworth, M., List, J. A., Metcalfe, R. D., & Vlaev, I. (2017). The behavioralist as tax collector: Using natural field experiments to enhance tax compliance. Journal of Public Economics, 148, 14–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.02.003
  16. Harinurdin, E., Safitri, K. A., & Kountur, R. (2024). Applying the theory of planned behavior in examining the intention to improve corporate tax compliance through compensation and counterproductive work behavior. Sage Open, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241305624
  17. Irawan, F., & Utama, A. S. (2021). The impact of tax audit and corruption perception on tax evasion. International Journal of Business and Society, 22(3), 1158–1173. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.4290.2021
  18. Kapoor, S. (2025). The role of SmartPLS in optimizing statistical analysis: A case study approach. 2025 5th International Conference on Innovative Research in Applied Science, Engineering and Technology (IRASET), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRASET64571.2025.11008204
  19. Kaufmann, D., Mehrez, G., & Gurgur, T. (2019). Voice or public sector management? An empirical investigation of determinants of public sector performance based on a survey of public officials. Journal of Applied Economics, 22(1), 321–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2019.1627718
  20. Khedekar, A., & Umranikar, M. (2025). Fiscal Feelings. In Modeling and Profiling Taxpayer Behavior and Compliance (pp. 33–60). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-0422-9.ch002
  21. Kirchler, E. (2007). The economic psychology of tax behaviour. Cambridge University Press.
  22. Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., & Wahl, I. (2008). Enforced versus voluntary tax compliance: The “slippery slope” framework. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(2), 210–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2007.05.004
  23. Kogler, C., Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Pantya, J., Belianin, A., & Kirchler, E. (2013). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance: Testing the assumptions of the slippery slope framework in Austria, Hungary, Romania and Russia. Journal of Economic Psychology, 34, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.010
  24. Luttmer, E. F. P., & Singhal, M. (2014). Tax morale. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(4), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.28.4.149
  25. Murphy, K. (2004). The role of trust in nurturing compliance: A study of accused tax avoiders. Law and Human Behavior, 28(2), 187–209. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:LAHU.0000022322.94776.ca
  26. Nawawi, N. H. A., Ramli, R., Khalid, N., & Abdul Rashid, S. F. (2023). Understanding the presence of the gig economy in Malaysia. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 31(1), 274–293. https://doi.org/10.60016/majcafe.v31.11
  27. Nurferyanto, D., & Takahashi, Y. (2024). Combating tax crimes in Indonesia: Tackling the issue head-on. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1556. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-04075-1
  28. Oktris, L., Muktiasih, I., & Azhar, Z. (2024). Understanding of taxation, taxpayer morality and tax compliance in Indonesia: The importance of tax awareness. Akrual: Jurnal Akuntansi, 16(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26740/jaj.v16n1.p1-14
  29. Permana, Y. H., & Sanjaya, M. R. (2025). Corruption, tax morale and tax evasion: An experimental study from Indonesia. Journal of Tax Reform, 11(2), 434–450. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2025.11.2.210
  30. Piketty, T., Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2014). Optimal taxation of top labor incomes: A tale of three elasticities. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(1), 230–271. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.6.1.230
  31. Saptono, P. B., & Khozen, I. (2023). What determines the tax compliance intention of individual taxpayers receiving COVID-19-related benefits? Insights from Indonesia. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 43(11/12), 1190–1217. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-02-2023-0045
  32. Savitri, E., & Musfialdy. (2016). The effect of taxpayer awareness, tax socialization, tax penalties, compliance cost at taxpayer compliance with service quality as mediating variable. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 219, 682–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.051
  33. Torgler, B. (2007). Tax Compliance and Tax Morale. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847207203
  34. Torgler, B., & Schneider, F. (2009). The impact of tax morale and institutional quality on the shadow economy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30(2), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2008.08.004
  35. Wenzel, M. (2005). Motivation or rationalisation? Causal relations between ethics, norms and tax compliance. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26(4), 491–508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2004.03.003
  36. Witte, A. D., & Woodbury, D. F. (1985). The effect of tax laws and tax administration on tax compliance: The case of the US individual. National Tax Journal, 38(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1086/NTJ41791992
  37. Xin Li, S. (2010). Social identities, ethnic diversity, and tax morale. Public Finance Review, 38(2), 146–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142110369239