Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Over the past two decades, numerous studies have explored the intersection of technology and accounting. However, research that specifically examines digital transformation in accounting particularly concerning emerging technologies, ethical risks, and regulatory challenges remains fragmented. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to conduct a bibliometric analysis of scholarly works addressing digital transformation in accounting. This study adopts a systematic literature review approach, analyzing articles containing the terms “digital transformation,” “accounting,” and related keywords in the “Article Title, Abstract, and Keywords” fields of the Scopus database from 2006 to 2025. The final dataset was compiled and analyzed using VOSviewer software to identify key research trends, co-authorship networks, and thematic clusters. The findings show that research on digital transformation in accounting has grown significantly since 2020, with increased attention to technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI), blockchain, and cloud computing. However, ethical and regulatory dimensions remain underexplored, indicating a research gap. In addition, contributions are concentrated in developed countries, with limited studies from emerging economies, suggesting a need for more globally inclusive research. The study offers insights for practitioners, regulators, and educators to better align digital adoption with ethical principles and regulatory frameworks in accounting. The findings contribute to fostering trust, transparency, and accountability in the digital transformation of accounting, which is essential for both professional integrity and public confidence.

Keywords

Digital Transformation accounting Emerging Technologies Ethics Regulation Bibliometric Analysis VOSviewer

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Abrahams, T. O., Ewuga, S. K., Kaggwa, S., Uwaoma, P. U., Hassan, A. O., & Dawodu, S. O. (2023). Review of strategic alignment: Accounting and cybersecurity for data confidentiality and financial security. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(3), 531–539. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.3.2691
  2. Agustí, M. A., & Orta-Pérez, M. (2023). Big data and artificial intelligence in the fields of accounting and auditing: a bibliometric analysis. Revista Espanola de Financiacion y Contabilidad, 52(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2022.2099675
  3. Al Shanti, A. M., & Elessa, M. S. (2023). The impact of digital transformation towards blockchain technology application in banks to improve accounting information quality and corporate governance effectiveness. Cogent Economics and Finance, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2022.2161773
  4. Alles, M. G. (2015). Drivers of the use and facilitators and obstacles of the evolution of big data by the audit profession. Accounting Horizons, 29(2), 439–449. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51067
  5. Anagnostopoulos, I. (2018). Fintech and regtech: Impact on regulators and banks. Journal of Economics and Business, 100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconbus.2018.07.003
  6. Anto, L. O., & Yusran, I. N. (2023). Determinants of the quality of financial reports. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 8(3), e01331. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v8i3.1331
  7. Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Big data and analytics in the modern audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-51684
  8. Austin, A. A., Carpenter, T. D., Christ, M. H., & Nielson, C. S. (2021). The data analytics journey: Interactions among auditors, managers, regulation, and technology. Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 1888–1924. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12680
  9. Banerjee, A. (2018). Blockchain technology: Supply chain insights from ERP. Advances in Computers, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adcom.2018.03.007
  10. Bélanger, F., & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.12.002
  11. Bhimani, A., & Willcocks, L. (2014). Digitisation, big data and the transformation of accounting information. Accounting and Business Research, 44(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.910051
  12. Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2025). Stakeholder interactions and ethical imperatives in big data and AI development. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100491
  13. Burr, C., & Cristianini, N. (2019). Can machines read our minds? Minds and Machines, 29(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-019-09497-4
  14. Chahed, Y. (2014). Translations in regulatory space: The arenas of regulatory innovation in accounting standard setting. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.2979/indjglolegstu.21.1.195
  15. Chun, K. W., Kim, H., & Lee, K. (2019). A study on research trends of technologies for industry 4.0; 3D printing, artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, and internet of things. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 518. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1328-8_51
  16. Cong, L. W., He, Z., & Zheng, J. (2017). Blockchain disruption and smart contracts. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2985764
  17. Dai, J., & Vasarhelyi, M. A. (2017). Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of Information Systems, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51804
  18. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  19. Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Coeckelbergh, M., López de Prado, M., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2023). Connecting the dots in trustworthy artificial intelligence: From AI principles, ethics, and key requirements to responsible AI systems and regulation. Information Fusion, 99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101896
  20. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  21. Fischer, D. (2019). Ethical and professional implications of blockchain accounting ledgers. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3331009
  22. Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M.-C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1–77. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
  23. Gonçalves, M. J. A., da Silva, A. C. F., & Ferreira, C. G. (2022). The future of accounting: How will digital transformation impact the sector? Informatics, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics9010019
  24. Groșanu, A., Fülöp, M.-T., Cordoș, G.-S., & Raita, G. (2021). Challenges and trends for the incorporation of big data in the accounting profession: From the traditional approach to the future professional accountant. CECCAR Business Review, 1(12). https://doi.org/10.37945/cbr.2020.12.08
  25. Groșanu, A., Fülöp, M.-T., & Măgdaș, N. (2024). Ethical dilemmas in digital accounting: A comprehensive literature review. CECCAR Business Review, 5(4), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.37945/cbr.2024.04.06
  26. Han, H., Liu, Z., Wang, X., & Li, S. (2021). Research of the relations among cloud computing, internet of things, big data, artificial intelligence, block chain and their application in maritime field. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1927(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1927/1/012026
  27. Hung, B. Q., Hoa, T. A., Hoai, T. T., & Nguyen, N. P. (2023). Advancement of cloud-based accounting effectiveness, decision-making quality, and firm performance through digital transformation and digital leadership: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. Heliyon, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16929
  28. IBM Security. (2023). Cost of a data breach report 2023. IBM. https://www.securityhq.com/reports/cost-of-a-data-breach-report-2023/
  29. Kokina, J., & Davenport, T. H. (2017). The emergence of artificial intelligence: How automation is changing auditing. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.2308/jeta-51730
  30. Kovalenko, S. N., Kalutskaya, N. A., Bolvachev, A. I., Prodanova, N. A., Sotnikova, L. V., & Shevchenko, O. P. (2021). Artificial intelligence in the accounting profession. Laplage em Revista, 7, 378–383. https://doi.org/10.24115/s2446-622020217extra-b938p.378-383
  31. KPMG. (2022). Transparency Report 2022.
  32. Kumar, J. (2024). Integration of artificial intelligence, big data, and cloud computing with internet of things. Convergence of Cloud with AI for Big Data Analytics: Foundations and Innovation. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119905233.ch1
  33. Lehner, O. M., Ittonen, K., Silvola, H., Ström, E., & Wührleitner, A. (2022a). Artificial intelligence based decision-making in accounting and auditing: ethical challenges and normative thinking. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 35(9). https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-09-2020-4934
  34. Marston, S., Li, Z., Bandyopadhyay, S., Zhang, J., & Ghalsasi, A. (2011). Cloud computing - The business perspective. Decision Support Systems, 51(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.006
  35. Mironiuc, M., Chersan, I.-C., & Robu, I.-B. (2013). Ethics in providing non-audit services to ensure transparency in financial reporting. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.463
  36. Modell, S. (2014). The societal relevance of management accounting: An introduction to the special issue. Accounting and Business Research, 44(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2014.882741
  37. Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., Shekelle, P., & Stewart, L. A. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1
  38. Moll, J., & Yigitbasioglu, O. (2019). The role of internet-related technologies in shaping the work of accountants: New directions for accounting research. British Accounting Review, 51(6). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2019.04.002
  39. Morshed, A., & Khrais, L. T. (2025). Cybersecurity in digital accounting systems: Challenges and solutions in the Arab Gulf region. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18010041
  40. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25, 348.
  41. Radziwill, N. (2018). Blockchain revolution: How the technology behind bitcoin is changing money, business, and the world. Quality Management Journal, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2018.1404373
  42. Rahmatika, D. N. (2014). The impact of internal audit function effectiveness on quality of financial reporting and its implications on good government governance research on local government Indonesia. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(18).
  43. Richins, G., Stapleton, A., Stratopoulos, T. C., & Wong, C. (2017). Big data analytics: Opportunity or threat for the accounting profession? Journal of Information Systems, 31(3). https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51805
  44. Rodríguez-Espíndola, O., Chowdhury, S., Dey, P. K., Albores, P., & Emrouznejad, A. (2022). Analysis of the adoption of emergent technologies for risk management in the era of digital manufacturing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121562
  45. Schmitz, J., & Leoni, G. (2019). Accounting and auditing at the time of blockchain technology: A research agenda. Australian Accounting Review, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12286
  46. Shiyyab, F. S., Alzoubi, A. B., Obidat, Q. M., & Alshurafat, H. (2023). The impact of artificial intelligence disclosure on financial performance. International Journal of Financial Studies, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijfs11030115
  47. Silva, R., Inácio, H., & Marques, R. P. (2022). Blockchain implications for auditing: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 22. https://doi.org/10.4192/1577-8517-v22_6
  48. Slobodianyk, Y., Shymon, S., & Adam, V. (2019). Compliance auditing in public administration: Ukrainian perspectives. Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2018-4-5-320-331
  49. Song, J. (2021). Ethical adaptation and legal regulation of modern technology. Cultures of Science, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/20966083211053085
  50. Sultan, N. (2010). Cloud computing for education: A new dawn? International Journal of Information Management, 30(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.09.004
  51. Taleb, N., & Mohamed, E. A. (2020). Cloud computing trends: A literature review. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0008
  52. Thottoli, M. M. (2024). The tactician role of FinTech in the accounting and auditing field: a bibliometric analysis. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-11-2021-0196
  53. Warren, J. D., Moffitt, K. C., & Byrnes, P. (2015). How big data will change accounting. Accounting Horizons, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51069
  54. Yoon, K., Hoogduin, L., & Zhang, L. (2015). Big data as complementary audit evidence. Accounting Horizons, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51076
  55. Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629.