Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study investigates the professionalization of Islamic accountants in Indonesia, an under-researched area in the Islamic accounting and accounting profession literature. Although Islamic finance has increased the demand for Sharia-compliant reporting and specialized accounting expertise, the professional status of Islamic accountants remains unclear. Drawing on the professional systems framework developed by Abbott (2014), this qualitative study examines professional work through its objective and subjective dimensions based on semi-structured interviews with 11 key stakeholders, including regulators, practitioners, and academics. The findings show that the professionalization of Islamic accountants is shaped by the interdependence between subjective and objective dimensions. Subjective factors include the evolving professional identity of Islamic accountants, societal perceptions and acceptance, and the debate over integration versus independence. Objective factors include standardization and certification, education and competency, and regulation and governance. This study contributes to the Islamic accounting literature by positioning Islamic accountants as emerging professional actors in Indonesia’s Islamic financial industry.

Keywords

Islamic Accounting Profession Accounting Profession Professionalization Accountant Islamic Finance

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

References

  1. Abbott, A. (2014). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. University of Chicago Press.
  2. Abduh, M., & Omar, M. A. (2012). Islamic banking and economic growth: The Indonesian experience. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 5(1), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538391211216811
  3. Armstrong, P. (2008). Calling out for more: Comment on the future of interpretive accounting research. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(6), 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.02.010
  4. Askary, S. (2006). Accounting professionalism – a cultural perspective of developing countries. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610634784
  5. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publication.
  6. Brief, R. P. (1975). The accountant’s responsibility in historical perspective. Accounting Review, 50(2), 285–297.
  7. Brinkmann, S. (2014). Unstructured and semi-structured interviewing. In P. Leavy (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 276–299). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199811755.013.030
  8. Brouard, F., Bujaki, M., Durocher, S., & Neilson, L. C. (2017). Professional accountants’ identity formation: An integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(2), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3157-z
  9. Byington, J. R., & Sutton, S. G. (1991). The self-regulating profession: An analysis of the political monopoly tendencies of the audit profession. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 2(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/1045-2354(91)90006-Y
  10. Carnegie, G. D., & Napier, C. J. (2010). Traditional accountants and business professionals: Portraying the accounting profession after Enron. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(3), 360–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2009.09.002
  11. Dai, N. T., & Free, C. (2016). Interview-based research in accounting 2000-2014: A review. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2711022
  12. Fisher, R., & Murphy, V. (1995). A pariah profession? Some student perceptions of accounting and accountancy. Studies in Higher Education, 20(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079512331381790
  13. Fogarty, T. J. (1995). Accountant ethics: A brief examination of neglected sociological dimensions. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(2), 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00872015
  14. Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., & Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
  15. Gallhofer, S., Haslam, J., & Kamla, R. (2011). The accountancy profession and the ambiguities of globalisation in a post-colonial, Middle Eastern and Islamic context: Perceptions of accountants in Syria. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 22(4), 376–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2010.09.003
  16. Gray, S. J. (1988). Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus, 24(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.1988.tb00200.x
  17. Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage Publications.
  18. Ika, S. R., & Abdullah, N. (2011). A comparative study of financial performance of Islamic banks and conventional banks in Indonesia. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(15), 199–207.
  19. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2022). Perubahan penomoran PSAK dan ISAK dalam SAK Indonesia. https://web.iaiglobal.or.id/assets/files/file_publikasi/Perubahan_Penomoran_PSAK_ISAK_dalam_SAK_Indonesia.pdf
  20. Lehman, G. (2010). Interpretive accounting research. Accounting Forum, 34(3–4), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2010.08.007
  21. Kartikahadi, H., Sinaga, R. U., Syamsul, M., & Siregar, S. V. (2012). Akuntansi keuangan berdasarkan SAK berbasis IFRS (1st ed.). Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia.
  22. Maulana, A. O. (2019). Legitimacy dynamics of accounting standards setting: The case of Indonesia [Doctoral dissertation, University of Reading]. https://doi.org/10.48683/1926.00087829
  23. Ministry of Education. (1954). Government Regulation No. 34 of 1954. Republic of Indonesia.
  24. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2019). Sharia banking statistic: Desember 2019. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/Documents/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Syariah---Desember-2019/SPS%20Desember%202019.pdf
  25. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2024). Sharia banking statistics: Desember 2024. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/syariah/data-dan-statistik/statistik-perbankan-syariah/Documents/Pages/Statistik-Perbankan-Syariah---Desember 2024/STATISTIK%20PERBANKAN%20SYARIAH%20-%20DESEMBER%202024.pdf
  26. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
  27. Preston, A. M., Cooper, D. J., Scarbrough, D. P., & Chilton, R. C. (1995). Changes in the code of ethics of the U.S. accounting profession, 1917 and 1988: The continual quest for legitimation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20(6), 507–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(94)00033-R
  28. Ramirez, C. (2001). Understanding social closure in its cultural context: Accounting practitioners in France (1920–1939). Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26(4–5), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(00)00023-4
  29. Sakagami, M., Yoshimi, H., & Okano, H. (1999). Japanese accounting profession in transition. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 12(3), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513579910277401
  30. Sikka, P., Willmott, H., & Lowe, T. (1989). Guardians of knowledge and public interest: Evidence and issues of accountability in the UK accountancy profession. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 2(2), 47–71. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513578910132286
  31. Suandi, A. B. (2013). Islamic accounting in Indonesia: A review from current global situation. Shogaku Kenkyuka Kiyo, 77, 241–263.
  32. Verma, S., & Gray, S. J. (2006). The creation of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India: The first steps in the development of an indigenous accounting profession post-independence. Accounting Historians Journal, 33(2), 131–156. https://doi.org/10.2308/0148-4184.33.2.131
  33. Willmott, H. (1986). Organising the profession: A theoretical and historical examination of the development of the major accountancy bodies in the U.K. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 11(6), 555–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(86)90036-X
  34. Yee, H. (2009). The re-emergence of the public accounting profession in China: A hegemonic analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2007.03.008
  35. Zeff, S. A. (2003a). How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 17(3), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.189
  36. Zeff, S. A. (2003b). How the U.S. accounting profession got where it is today: Part II. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.4.267