Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 285 Download : 265

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This research begins with a phenomenon where some government institutions experienced an increase in corruption cases in budget absorption so that it did not reflect the implementation of effective good government governance. This study aims to examine and analyze the effect of implementing an internal control system and the enforcement of good government governance on the level of budget abuse control and its impact on public accountability. This research is quantitative research. Collecting data using a questionnaire to 78 samples from total of 196 employees in the Travel Document Management and Analysis Work Unit at the Directorate of Immigration Traffic. Data analysis using SmartPLS. The results of the study show internal control system and good government governance significant effect on the control of budget abuse. In addition, the control of budget abuse also has a significant effect on public accountability.

Keywords

Control of Budget Abuse Good Government Governance Internal Control System Public Accountability

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). 
How to Cite
Saraswati, A. E., & Setiyawati, H. (2021). Factors affecting the control of budget abuse. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 3(2), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol3.iss2.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Afiah, N. N. (2009). Akuntansi Pemerintahan: Implementasi Akuntansi Keuangan Pemerintah Daerah. Kencana.
  2. Ajzen, & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes And Predicting Sosial Behavior. Englewood Cliffs. Nj: Prentice-Hall.
  3. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
  4. Anton, M. G., Tinangon, J. J., & Elim, I. (2016). Penerapan anggaran berbasis kinerja untuk menunjang akuntabilitas publik pada badan lingkungan hidup kota Manado. Jurnal EMBA, 4(3), 553–563.
  5. Djalil, M. A., Nadirsyah, & Fatmi, L. (2017). Influence of implementation of government accounting standard and the effectiveness of government’s internal control system on the quality of local financial report and its impact toward the accountability of regional financial management (a research on g. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 8(4), 106–114.
  6. Falah, F., & Purwanto. (2019). Institution of drought mitigation in Grobogan Regency. Journal of Watershed Management Research, 8(5), 55.
  7. Hamdani, R., & Albar, A. R. (2016). Internal controls in fraud prevention effort: a case study. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 20(2), 127–135.
  8. ICW. (2018). Laporan tren penindakan kasus korupsi tahun 2018. https://antikorupsi.org/sites/default/files/laporan_tren_penindakan_kasus_korupsi_2018.pdf
  9. Listari, S., Hermanto, & Martiningsih, R. S. P. (2018). The influence of the government internal control system, government accounting standards, role of internal auditors, and completion of audit findings to good governance. IOSR Journal of Business and Management, 20(2), 66–79.
  10. Lukito, P. K. (2014). Membumikan Transparansi Dan Akuntabilitas Kinerja Sektor Publik: Tantangan Demokrasi Ke Depan. Grasindo.
  11. Mardiasmo. (2018). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  12. Pane, A. A. (2018). Pengaruh penerapan sistem pengendalian internal pemerintah terhadap kecurangan: Survei pada pemprov Sumatera Utara. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Bisnis, 4(2), 40–48.
  13. Schleiter, P., & Voznaya, A. (2016). Party system institutionalization, accountability and governmental corruption. British Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 315–342.
  14. Sujarweni, V. W. (2015). Sistem Akuntansi. Pustaka Baru Press.
  15. Sumarsan, T. (2013). Sistem Pengendalian Manajemen: Konsep, Aplikasi, dan Pengukuran Kinerja. Indeks.
  16. Widiyarta, K., Herawati, N. T., & Atmadja, A. T. (2017). Pengaruh kompetensi aparatur, budaya organisasi, whistleblowing dan sistem pengendalian internal terhadap fraud dalam pengelolaan dana desa : Kabupaten Buleleng. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Akuntansi Undiksha, 8(2), 1–12.
  17. Wu, X., & Wang, J. (2018). Management’s materiality criteria of internal control weaknesses and corporate fraud: Evidence from China. The International Journal of Accounting, 53(1), 1–19.
  18. Yusnaini, Ghozali, I., Fuad, & Yuyetta, E. N. A. (2017). Accountability and fraud type effects on fraud detection responsibility. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(8), 424–436.