Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 201 Download : 174

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the asset turnover ratio, current ratio, debt ratio and return on net worth influences profitability at each firm life cycle stages in manufacturing companies on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. The study only focuses on introduction stage and growth stage. The classification at each stage of the firm life stages uses the sales growth variable to categorize it. The population in this study are manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange for the 2016-2020 period. The sampling technique in this study used purposive sampling technique and obtained a sample of 36 companies. The data analysis method used is panel data multiple regression analysis. The results indicate that at introduction stage only debt ratio and return on net worth that found has a significance influences on profitability. At growth stage almost all independent variable has a significance influences on profitability, except current ratio variable.

Keywords

Introduction stage growth stage profitability

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 M Kemal Al Rasyid, Poppy Nurmayanti, Hariadi Hariadi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). 
How to Cite
Al Rasyid, M. K., Nurmayanti, P. ., & Hariadi. (2022). Does financial performance follow firm life cycle? Evidence from Indonesian firms. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 4(2), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol4.iss2.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aldaas, A. (2021). The effect of firm life cycle on profitability: Evidence from Jordanian firms. Management Science Letters, 11, 1919–1926. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2021.1.009
  2. Amir, A., & Wuu, B. (2020). the Effect of Solvability Ratio and Current Ratio on Profitability At Chemical Sector Companies Listed in the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Jurnal Ekonomi Bisnis Manajemen Prima, 1(2), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.34012/jebim.v1i2.854
  3. Angelina, C., Sharon, S., Lim, S., Lombogia, J. Y. R., & Aruan, D. A. (2020). Pengaruh Current Ratio, Debt to Equity, Perputaran Kas dan Total Asset TurnOver (TATO) Terhadap Profitabilitas pada Perusahaan Food & Beverages yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Owner, 4(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v4i1.178
  4. Anthony, J. H., & Ramesh, K. (1992). Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices. A test of the life cycle hypothesis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 15(2–3), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(92)90018-W
  5. Barus, A. C., & Leliani. (2013). Analisis Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Profitabilitas pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia. Jurnal Wira Ekonomi Mikroskil, 3(2), 111–121.
  6. Black, E. L. (1998). Life-cycle impacts on the incremental value-relevance of earnings and cash flow measures. Journal of Financial Statement Analysis, 4(1), 40–56.
  7. Chandra, S., & Juliawati, C. (2020). Effects of Long Term Debt to Total Assets, Short Term Debt to Total Assets, Total Asset Turnover, and Inventory Turnover on Profitability of Manufacturing Companies in Consumer Goods Subsector Listed on IDX. Journal of Applied Business and Technology, 1(3), 212–222.
  8. Chinedu Innocent, E., Ifeoma Mary, O., & Monday Matthew, O. (2013). Financial Ratio Analysis as a Determinant of Profitability in Nigerian Pharmaceutical Industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 8(8), 107–117. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v8n8p107
  9. Farihah, A. M. (2015). Pengaruh debt ratio, debt to equity ratio, longterm debt to equity ratio, kepemilikan institusional dan kepemilikan manajerial terhadap profitabilitas pada Perusahaan LQ 45. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
  10. Gitman, L. J. (2015). Principles of Managerial Finance. New York: Pearson Education Limited.
  11. Gort, M., & Klepper, S. (1982). Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovations. The Economic Journal, 92(367), 630. https://doi.org/10.2307/2232554
  12. Halim, A. (2017). Pengaruh Current Ratio, Debt To Equity Ratio dan Debt to Assets Ratio Terhadap Profitabilitas Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Periode 2012-2015.
  13. Hery. (2015). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Yogyakarta: Centre for Academic Publishing Service.
  14. Hofstrand, D. (2019). Understanding Profitability. In Https://Www.Extension.Iastate.Edu/Agdm/Wholefarm/Html/C3-24.Html (Issue December). Iowa State University Extension and Outreach.
  15. Horne, J. C. Van, & Wachowicz, J. M. (2014). Prinsip-Prinsip Manajemen Keuangan. Penerbit Salemba Empat.
  16. Jensen, M. C. (1986). Journal of Social and Personal. Journal of Social and Personal Relationship, 15(6), 755–773.
  17. Jovanic, B. (1982). Selection and the Evolution of Industry. Econometrica, 50(3), 649–670.
  18. Jumingan. (2014). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  19. Kasmir. (2008). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  20. Kasmir. (2014). Analisis Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
  21. Kasmir. (2015). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (1st ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
  22. Kazanjian, R. K. (1988). Relation of Dominant Problems to Stages of Growth in Technology-Based New Ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 31(2), 257–279. https://doi.org/10.5465/256548
  23. Kumar, S., & Bansal, L. K. (2008). The impact of mergers and acquisitions on corporate performance in India. Management Decision, 46(10), 1531–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740810920029
  24. Kusriyanti, I. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Current Ratio (CR), Debt Ratio (DR) dan Total Asset Turnover (TATO) Terhadap Profitabilitas (ROI) Perusahaan Telekomunikasi di Indonesia (Studi Kasus pada Perusahaan Telekomunikasi yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2009- 2016).
  25. Myers, S. C. (1977). Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5(2), 147–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(77)90015-0
  26. Park, Y., & Chen, K. H. (2006). The effect of accounting conservatism and life-cycle stages on firm valuation. Journal of Applied Business Research, 22(3), 75–92. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v22i3.1428
  27. Polli, R. E. (1968). A Test of the Classical Product Life Cycle by Means of Actual Sales Histories. University of Pennsylvania.
  28. PWC. (2017). IFRS 9, Financial Instruments-Understanding the Basics. PWC.
  29. Qamara, T., Wulandari, A., Sukoco, A., & Suyono, J. (2020). The Influence of Current Ratio, Debt to Equity Ratio, And Total Asset Turnover Ratio on Profitability of Transportation Companies Listed On the Indonesia Stock Exchange 2014-2018. International Journal of Integrated Education, Engineering and Business, 3(2), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.29138/ijieeb.v3i2.1169
  30. Sefiani, C. Y. K., & Sitohang, S. (2015). Pengaruh current ratio, total asset turn over, dan umur perusahaan terhadap profitabilitas. Jurnal Ilmu dan Riset Manajemen, 4(11), 1-15.
  31. Spence, A. M. (1977). Entry, Capacity, Investment and Oligopolistic Pricing. The Bell Journal of Economics, 8(2), 534. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003302
  32. Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  33. Sunjoko, M. I., & Arilyn, E. J. (2016). Effect of inventory turnover, total asset turnover, fixed asset turnover, current ratio and average collection period on profitability. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 18(1), 79–83.
  34. Vatansever, M., & Hepsen, A. (2013). Determining Impacts on Non-Performing Loan Ratio in Turkey. Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, 2(4), 119–129.
  35. Wikardi, L. D., & Wiyani, N. T. (2017). Pengaruh Debt to Equity Ratio, Firm Size, Inventory Turnover, Assets Turnover dan Pertumbuhan Penjualan Terhadap Profitabilitas. Jurnal Online Insan Akuntan, 2(1), 99–118.
  36. Wulandari, S., & Zulhaimi, H. (2017). Pengaruh Profitabilitas terhadap Corporate Social Responsibility Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur dan Jasa yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia Corporate social responsibility atau Pengolahan Lingkungan Hidup (Proper) merupakan Program Kementrian Lingkungan. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 5(1), 1477–1488.