Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the application of the Murabaha contract in consumer financing within Indonesian Islamic banks based on the substantive principles of sharia and the maqāṣid framework of Ibn ‘Āshūr. The study adopts a normative-qualitative and descriptive-comparative method analyzing PSAK 102/402, DSN-MUI fatwas, and real practices in Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI). Data were collected through document review and interviews with practitioners. The findings reveal that current Murabaha practices emphasize administrative compliance over the substantive nature of sale transactions, with fixed margins often benchmarked to interest rates. This raises the potential for hidden riba and contradicts maqāṣid values such as ḥifẓ al-māl (wealth protection), al-‘adl (justice), and al-ṣidq (truthfulness). The paper proposes a margin determination model based on 'iwāḍ (legitimate compensation for risk and effort) and recommends reformulating financial reports aligned with maqāṣid principles. This study contributes to both conceptual and technical reform in Islamic finance, with significant implications for regulation and Islamic accounting education

Keywords

Murabahah Sharia PSAK Maqāṣhid Ibn ‘Āshūr Hidden Riba

Article Details

How to Cite
Nurbaidah, S. U., Hidayah, N., & Muhajirin, M. (2025). Evaluation of the substance of consumptive murabahah: Maqāṣid perspectives, regulation, and sharia accounting. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 7(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol7.iss2.art2

References

  1. AAOIFI. (2017). Financial Accounting Standard (FAS) No. 2: Murabaha and Murabaha to the Purchase Orderer. Bahrain: Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions.
  2. Ahmed, H., & Khan, T. (2020). Trends in Islamic consumer financing. Journal of Islamic Finance, 12(2), 101–120.
  3. Almutairi, A. R., & Quttainah, M. A. (2019). Corporate governance and accounting conservatism in Islamic banks. Thunderbird International Business Review, 61(5), 731–746. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.21903
  4. Baydoun, N., Willett, R., & Islam, M. A. (2018). Accounting, ethics and religion: A Muslim perspective. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3550-3
  5. Chapra, M. U. (2000). Islamic Monetary System (I. Abidin, Editor). Jakarta: Gema Insani Press and Insan Cendekia. (Original title: Towards a Just Monetary System)
  6. DSN-MUI. (2000). Fatwa No. 04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 concerning Murabahah.
  7. DSN-MUI. (2012). Fatwa No. 84/DSN-MUI/XII/2012 concerning Methods of Recognition of Income and Expenses in Sharia Accounting.
  8. DSN-MUI. (2016). Fatwa No. 105/DSN-MUI/X/2016 concerning the Murabahah Agreement on Sharia Financial Institutions.
  9. El-Gamal, M. A. (2006). Islamic finance: Law, economics, and practice. Cambridge University Press.
  10. Hadju, N. S., Tanriono, M., & Hiola, Y. (2023). Analysis of PSAK 102 implementation in Murabahah accounting. Journal of Accounting Students, 2(3), 370–380.
  11. Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2007). Exploring the ethical identity of Islamic banks via communication in annual reports. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(1), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9272-5
  12. Hassan, M., & Othman, R. (2024). Enhancing maqāṣid compliance in Islamic finance: A strategic perspective. ISRA International Journal of Islamic Finance, 16(1), 1–20.
  13. Ibn Taymiyyah (2004). Majmū‘ al-Fatāwā (Vol. 29). Riyadh: King Fahd Library.
  14. Ibn al-Qayyim (2003). I‘lām al-Muwaqqi‘īn (Vol. 2). Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
  15. Statement of Sharia Financial Accounting Standards (PSAK) No. 402 (2024): Murabahah Accounting. Jakarta: Indonesian Institute of Accountants.
  16. Islamic Financial Services Board (IFSB). (2007). Guiding Principles on Shariah Governance Systems for Institutions Offering Islamic Financial Services. Kuala Lumpur: IFSB.
  17. Kamla, R. (2009). Critical insights into contemporary Islamic accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20(8), 921–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2008.01.004
  18. Maksum, M., & Hidayah, N. (2023). The mechanism of avoiding riba in Islamic financial institutions: Experiences of Indonesia and Malaysia. Juris (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah), 22(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v22i2.6952
  19. Morshed, A. (2024). Reconciling AAOIFI and IFRS: Impacts on the legitimacy of Murabahah in Islamic banking. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 15(1), [ahead-of-print].
  20. Nur Hidayah, A., Azis, A., & Muslim, M. B. (2022). Complying with sharia while exempting from value-added tax: Murābaḥah in Indonesian Islamic banks. Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 22(1), 59–74.
  21. OJK. (2018). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 35/POJK.05/2018 tentang Penyelenggaraan Usaha Lembaga Keuangan Syariah.
  22. OJK. (2020). Peraturan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan No. 31/POJK.05/2020 tentang Laporan Keuangan Lembaga Keuangan Syariah.
  23. Rahman, M., Idris, A., & Syah, M. (2021). Risk ownership in Murabahah financing: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Asian Journal of Islamic Management, 3(2), 87–102.
  24. Setiyawati, P. S., Nuroini, D. A., Lestari, D., Farida, E. A., Khoiruddin, M., & Latifah, E. (2023). Perspektif maqashid syariah ibnu ashur dalam akuntansi murabahah dalam metode pengakuan keuntungan. Ecotechnopreneur: Journal Economics, Technology and Entrepreneur, 2(02), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.62668/ecotechnopreneur.v2i02.537
  25. Smaoui, H., Mimouni, K., & Mbarek, S. (2022). Murabaha financing and performance in Islamic banks. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 76, 101513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101513
  26. Zulfiqar, R. (2023). Shariah audit challenges in Islamic banking practices. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 14(1), 89–108.