Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 90 Download : 21

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the factors influencing information system performance in government agencies in Sleman Regency, focusing on the user perspective. The user perspective needs to be analyzed, considering that in government organizations, there are sometimes information systems that have the same function but different usage instructions. Some information systems originate from the center and others are created independently by the regions. This causes operators to operate several systems that have almost the same function. The dependent variable is system performance, while the independent variables include personal technical skills, top management support, human resource quality, and education and training. Data were collected using questionnaires distributed to employees directly involved in the implementation and use of the information system. Out of 160 targeted respondents, 158 completed the questionnaire. The data were analyzed using linear regression, and hypotheses were tested with t-tests. The results show that all independent variables significantly affect information system performance, highlighting the importance of both personal and organizational factors in enhancing the effectiveness of information systems within government institutions.

Keywords

Information system performance Government agencies Personal technical skills top management support Education and training

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 V. Mardi Widyadomono, Lilis Endang WIjayanti, Kristianto Pw, Rokhmat Rokhmat

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). 
How to Cite
Widyadomono, V. M., Pw, K., WIjayanti, L. E., & Rokhmat, R. (2025). Assessing information system performance in government agency from the user’s perspective. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 7(2), 139–148. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol7.iss2.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alhamid, L. C., Maslichah, M., & Mahsuni, A. W. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja sistem informasi akuntansi di lingkungan pemerintahan Kabupaten Kaimana. e-Jurnal Ilmiah Riset Akuntansi, 12(1), 48–60. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56444/sa.v11i1.3017
  2. Aziz, M. N., & Andhaniwati, E. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja sistem informasi akuntansi (studi kasus PT Petrokimia Gresik). OIKOS: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.23969/oikos.v7i2.7890
  3. Choe, J. M. (1996). The relationships among performance of accounting information systems, influence factors, and evolution level of information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(4), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1996.11518107
  4. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
  5. Faizal, A., Santi, R., & Gunawan, C. E. (2020). Analisis kinerja sistem informasi akademik menggunakan metode TRADE pada Universitas Tridinanti Palembang. Journal of Software Engineering Ampera, 1(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalsea.v1i1.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51519/journalsea.v1i1.13
  6. Hambali, F., Akhirson, A., & Wijayanti, R. (2011). Analisis technology acceptance model (TAM) terhadap faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penerimaan nasabah terhadap layanan internet banking (Studi empiris terhadap nasabah bank di Depok). Prosiding PESAT (pp. 18–19), Universitas Gunadharma.
  7. Jen, T. F. (2002). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja sistem informasi akuntansi. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 4(2), 135-154.
  8. Kurniasari, S. N., Widyarti, M. T. H., & Ciptaningtias, A. F. (2024). The influence of education and training, user involvement in system development toward accounting information systems performance with top management support as intervening variables (Case study at Dinas Pertanian, Perikanan dan Pangan, Semarang District). Applied Accounting and Management Review (AAMAR), 3(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.32497/aamar.v3i1.5472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32497/aamar.v3i1.5472
  9. Muntianah, S. T., Astuti, E. S., & Azizah, D. F. (2012). Pengaruh minat perilaku terhadap actual use teknologi informasi dengan pendekatan technology acceptance model (TAM) (studi kasus pada kegiatan belajar mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi Universitas Brawijaya Malang). Profit: Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis, 6(1).
  10. Naruminingsih, N. P., Sunarwijaya, I. K., & Ardianti, P. N. H. (2022). Kinerja sistem informasi akuntansi pada Kantor Inspektorat Pemerintahan Kabupaten Badung. KARMA (Karya Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi), 2(1), 2265–2273.
  11. Nurhayati, N. (2015). Melukiskan akuntansi dengan kuas interpretif. BISNIS: Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen Islam, 3(1), 174–191. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v3i1.1481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/bisnis.v3i1.1481
  12. Prastya, S. G. (2018). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja sistem informasi akuntansi pada RSUD dr. Soehadi Prijonegoro Sragen. Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
  13. Pratama, A., Wulandari, S. Z., & Indyastuti, D. L. (2022). Analisis technology acceptance model (TAM) pada penggunaan aplikasi PLN Daily (Studi empiris pada pegawai PLN UP3 Tegal). INOBIS: Jurnal Inovasi Bisnis dan Manajemen Indonesia, 5(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.31842/jurnalinobis.v5i3.235 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31842/jurnalinobis.v5i3.235
  14. Saputra, P. M., Suhartono, E., Durya, N. P. M. A., & TAH, N. (2024). Analisis kinerja sistem informasi pengelolaan keuangan daerah dengan moderasi pendidikan dan pelatihan pengguna. Jurnal STIE Semarang (Edisi Elektronik), 16(2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.33747/stiesmg.v16i2.703 DOI: https://doi.org/10.33747/stiesmg.v16i2.703
  15. Sisilia, N., & Firdaus, R. (2024). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja sistem informasi akuntansi. Anggaran: Jurnal Publikasi Ekonomi dan Akuntansi, 2(4), 337–343. https://doi.org/10.61132/anggaran.v2i4.1012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.61132/anggaran.v2i4.1012
  16. Sitorus, E. S. (2021). Pengaruh sistem informasi manajemen terhadap kinerja pegawai. Remik: Riset dan E-Jurnal Manajemen Informatika Komputer, 5(2), 313–322.
  17. Wijayanti, L. E., Pw, A. K., & Nurmalia, V. D. (2022). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja sistem informasi yang digunakan pada instansi pemerintah. Inventory: Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(1), 76–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/inventory.v6i1.11296
  18. Yasa, I. K. O., Putra, I. P. M. J. S., & Ernawatiningsih, N. P. L. (2020). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja sistem informasi akuntansi pada Perusahaan Daerah Air Minum (PDAM) di Kabupaten Klungkung. Kumpulan Hasil Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi (KHARISMA), 2(3).
  19. Yassir, M., Agunawan, A., Gafur, G., Rahman, A., & Fitriati, I. (2024). Sistem informasi laporan akuntabilitas kinerja instansi pemerintah. Jurnal Instek (Informatika Sains dan Teknologi), 9(1), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.24252/instek.v9i1.46422 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/instek.v9i1.46422