Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of competence, work experience, independence, professional skepticism, self-efficacy, and professional ethics on audit quality among auditors at the Supreme Audit Agency of the Republic of Indonesia (BPK RI) Representative Office of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The study population was all 51 auditors working at the BPK RI Representative Office of the Special Region of Yogyakarta. The sample consisted of 41 active auditors working at the BPK RI Representative Office of the Special Region of Yogyakarta, selected using a purposive sampling technique. The results of this study provide evidence that the competency variable has a significant positive effect on audit quality. Meanwhile, work experience, independence, professional skepticism, self-efficacy, and professional ethics do not significantly influence audit quality. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the BPK RI institution's efforts to improve audit quality, one of which is by improving auditor competence in accordance with applicable standards.

Keywords

Audit Quality Competence Independence Professional Skepticism Self-Efficacy

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Nadhilah Riswina Hilda, Marfuah Marfuah, Masetah Ahmad Tarmizi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). 
How to Cite
Nadhilah Riswina Hilda, Marfuah, M., & Tarmizi, M. A. (2026). Determinants of audit quality: A study of auditors at the supreme audit agency of the Republic of Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 8(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol8.iss1.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abimanyu, H. Y., & Suhartini, D. (2023). Kualitas audit pada KAP di Surabaya dengan teknologi informasi sebagai variabel pemoderasi. JEMASI: Jurnal Ekonomi Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 19(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.35449/jemasi.v19i1.590
  2. Agustina, C., Rini, Y. P., & Yuliadi, E. T. (2021). Pengaruh etika profesi dan kecerdasan emosional terhadap kualitas audit (studi empiris pada KAP di wilayah Tangerang Selatan dan Tangerang). ECo-Fin: Economy and Financial, 3(2), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.32877/ef.v3i2.405
  3. Anam, H., Tenggara, F. O., & Sari, D. K. (2021). Pengaruh independensi, integritas, pengalaman dan objektifitas auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Forum Ekonomi: Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 23(1), 96–101.
  4. Anam, H., Wilma, & Lukita, H. S. (2021). Etika profesi, pengalaman, pengetahuan, dan akuntabilitas auditor berpengaruh terhadap kualitas audit. JAAKFE UNTAN (Jurnal Audit dan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tanjungpura), 10(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.26418/jaakfe.v10i1.45046
  5. Basuki. (2023). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, time budget pressure dan pengalaman kerja terhadap kualitas audit. Dynamic Management Journal, 7(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.31000/dmj.v7i1.7194
  6. BPK RI. (2017). Peraturan Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 tentang standar pemeriksaan keuangan negara. Jakarta. Retrieved from https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/31506/peraturan-bpk-no-1-tahun-2017
  7. BPK RI. (2019). Untuk menjaga kepercayaan pemangku kepentingan, BPK harus menghasilkan pemeriksaan yang berkualitas. Retrieved from https://www.bpk.go.id/news/untuk-menjaga-kepercayaan-pemangku-kepentingan-bpk-harus-menghasilkan-pemeriksaan-yang-berkualitas
  8. Djaddang, S., & Lysandra, S. (2022). Self-efficacy, professional ethics, and internal audit quality. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis, 25(2), 401–414. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v25i2.3794
  9. Evia, Z., Wibowo, R. E., & Nurcahyono, N. (2022). Pengalaman kerja, independensi, integritas, kompetensi dan pengaruhnya terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Governance, 2(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.24853/jago.2.2.141-149
  10. Fau, A. M. M., Siagian, P., & Sitepu, W. R. B. (2021). Pengaruh etika profesi, kompetensi dan integritas auditor terhadap kualitas audit (studi empiris pada kantor akuntan publik di Kota Medan). Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(2), 268–282. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v5i2.391
  11. Firmansyah, Sarwani, & Safrida, L. (2020). Pengaruh kompetensi, objektivitas, etika, integritas, dan time budget pressure terhadap kualitas pemeriksaan pada BPK perwakilan Kalimantan Timur. Organum: Jurnal Saintifik Manajemen dan Akuntansi, 3(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.35138/organum.v3i2.112
  12. Heider, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10628-000
  14. Kharisma, D. A. N., & Budiartha, I. K. (2022). Self-efficacy dan pengalaman auditor terhadap kualitas audit yang dimoderasi oleh kecerdasan emosional. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 32(2), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2022.v32.i02.p11
  15. Kusumawardhani, N. A. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi sikap independensi auditor (studi empiris pada KAP Kota Yogyakarta) [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. Retrieved from http://dspace.uii.ac.id/123456789/45354
  16. Nurbaiti, A., & Prakasa, E. (2022). Analisis pengaruh independensi, task complexity, dan kompetensi auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(4), 3604–3615. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i4.1041
  17. Oklivia, & Marlinah, A. (2014). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, dan faktor-faktor dalam diri auditor lainnya terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 16(2), 143–157.
  18. Pangesti, L. W. (2021). The effect of auditor independence, auditor ethics, auditor experience, skepticism and auditor fee towards audit quality (study at public accounting firms in Special Region of Yogyakarta) [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. Retrieved from https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/43958
  19. Pesudo, D. A. A., Kurniadi, C. I., Martono, S., Theotama, G., & Matitaputty, J. S. (2023). Factors affecting audit quality of BPKP – Central Java chapter. Perspektif Akuntansi, 6(1), 56–73. https://doi.org/10.24246/persi.v6i1.p56-73
  20. Rahayu, N. K. S., & Suryanawa, I. K. (2020). Pengaruh independensi, profesionalisme, skeptisme profesional, etika profesi dan gender terhadap kualitas audit pada KAP di Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 30(3), 686–698. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2020.v30.i03.p11
  21. Rahayu, R. A. (2020). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional audit dan keahlian auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Terpadu, 13(2), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.35448/jrat.v13i2.9129
  22. Rahmi, N. U., Hadi, T., Susilawati, Widia, & Fredy, A. (2021). Pengaruh kompetensi, akuntabilitas, penerapan kode etik, dan gaya kepemimpinan terhadap kualitas audit di KAP di Medan. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 5(2), 607–619. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v5i2.414
  23. Rosini, I., & Hakim, D. R. (2021). Audit quality based on time budget pressure and auditor experience. JAK (Jurnal Akuntansi): Kajian Ilmiah Akuntansi, 8(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.30656/jak.v8i1.2223
  24. Saifudin, Santoso, A., & Violita, D. J. (2022). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, time budget pressure terhadap kualitas audit dengan etika auditor sebagai moderasi. Jurnal Lentera Bisnis, 11(3), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.34127/jrlab.v11i3.638
  25. Sangadah, L. (2022). Pengaruh akuntabilitas auditor, independensi auditor, dan profesionalisme auditor terhadap kualitas audit. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(2), 1137–1143. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i2.636
  26. Saptohutomo, A. P. (2022). Kasus suap Bupati Ade Yasin, auditor BPK yang korupsi wajib dihukum berat. Kompas.com. Retrieved from https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2022/04/29/07040051/kasus-suap-bupati-ade-yasin-auditor-bpk-yang-korupsi-wajib-dihukum-berat
  27. Sihombing, Y. A., & Triyanto, D. N. (2019). Pengaruh independensi, objektivitas, pengetahuan, pengalaman kerja, integritas terhadap kualitas audit. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.33369/j.akuntansi.9.2.141-160
  28. Siregar, M. I., Hidayat, M., Saggaf, A., Maryati, S., & Kesuma, N. (2022). Studi empiris kualitas audit pada Badan Pemeriksa Keuangan Republik Indonesia perwakilan Lampung. Owner: Riset dan Jurnal Akuntansi, 6(4), 3445–3453. https://doi.org/10.33395/owner.v6i4.1098
  29. Tangke, P., Ng, S., & Tungabdi, E. (2020). Pengalaman, kompleksitas tugas dan self-efficacy sebagai determinan skeptisisme profesional untuk membentuk audit judgment. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Governance, 4(2), 111–149. https://doi.org/10.36766/ijag.v4i2.123
  30. Utama, F. R., & Rohman, F. (2023). Pendekatan teori atribusi pada analisis determinan kualitas audit. Jurnal Akuntansi Indonesia, 12(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.30659/jai.12.1.43-55
  31. Wardana, D. M. K., & Ramantha, I. W. (2023). Independensi, etika profesi, dan integritas terhadap kinerja auditor KAP di Bali. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 33(2), 440–454. https://doi.org/10.24843/EJA.2023.v33.i02.p11
  32. Wardhani, D. K., & Sudaryati, E. (2021). Enforcement the BPK auditor code of conduct to improve state financial management. Journal of Accounting Science, 5(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.21070/jas.v5i1.1118
  33. Widiantari, N. K. S., Rustiarini, N. W., & Dewi, N. P. S. (2022). Pengaruh locus of control, self esteem, skeptisme, ethical sensitivity, dan self-efficacy terhadap audit judgment pada kantor akuntan publik di Bali. Jurnal KARMA (Karya Riset Mahasiswa Akuntansi), 2(1), 2158–2169.
  34. Wulandari, S. A. (2022). Pengaruh kompetensi, independensi, akuntabilitas, objektivitas, motivasi dan masa kerja auditor internal terhadap kualitas hasil audit internal [Undergraduate thesis, Universitas Islam Indonesia]. Retrieved from http://dspace.uii.ac.id/123456789/43305
  35. Yefni, & Sari, P. (2021). Akankah fee audit dan karakteristik auditor menentukan kualitas audit? Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 12(1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jamal.2021.12.1.10
  36. Yulanda, N., Ladewi, Y., & Yamaly, F. (2021). Pengaruh skeptisisme profesional, etika profesi, dan risiko audit terhadap kualitas audit. JAK: Jurnal Akuntansi, 16(2), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.37058/jak.v1i2.6725