Main Article Content
Abstract
This study seeks to examine taxpayer perceptions of the Coretax System utilizing the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Information Systems Success Model (ISSM). Employing a qualitative research approach, this investigation adopts a phenomenological method and conducts semi-structured interviews with 11 users of the Coretax system. The findings indicate that Coretax is perceived as user-friendly and advantageous in enhancing the efficiency of tax reporting and payment processes. The quality of the system, service, and information is generally regarded as satisfactory; however, technical challenges, limited outreach, and slow service responses persist. The primary impetus for utilizing Coretax is the regulatory mandate necessitating its use in tax assessments. While Coretax holds potential for improving tax compliance, this potential is not fully realized because of system instability. The conditions facilitating the Coretax system and governmental support are deemed adequate, albeit hindered by limited outreach and training provided by the government or the Directorate General of Taxes (DJP). The availability of technology did not significantly influence the utilization of the Coretax system. There is no resistance to change, as the Coretax system is perceived as more accessible and integrated, and a positive perception of its security.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2026 Hari Tri Wibowo, Dina Mariani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).