Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 64 Download : 24

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study examines the role of work engagement in mediating the relationship between perceived internal corporate social responsibility (CSR) and workplace deviant behavior, with gender as a moderating variable. The research focuses on employees working in banking companies. Data were collected from 183 employees of banking institutions through an online survey questionnaire and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicate that perceived internal CSR has a positive and significant effect on work engagement. This finding suggests that organizational practices that prioritize employee welfare, such as fair treatment, career development opportunities, and work–life balance, can strengthen employees’ psychological attachment to their work. When employees perceive that their organization genuinely cares about their well-being, they tend to develop stronger dedication, energy, and involvement in their work. Furthermore, the findings reveal that internal CSR has a negative and significant effect on deviant behavior. This result indicates that employees who perceive their organization as socially responsible are less likely to engage in counterproductive behaviors that may harm the organization. Work engagement is also found to have a negative and significant effect on deviant behavior, suggesting that employees who are more engaged in their work tend to avoid behaviors that violate organizational norms. In addition, the mediation analysis demonstrates that work engagement partially mediates the relationship between internal CSR and deviant behavior. However, the moderating role of gender is not supported, indicating that the influence of internal CSR in reducing deviant behavior is relatively consistent across male and female employees in the banking sector. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of internal CSR as a strategic organizational resource for fostering employee engagement and minimizing workplace deviance.

Keywords

Internal Corporate Social Responsibility Work Engagement Deviant Behavior Gender PLS-SEM

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Juanda Surya, Fitriani Prastiawati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). 
How to Cite
Surya, J., & Prastiawati, F. (2026). Work engagement as a mediator between perceived internal corporate social responsibility and deviant behaviour: The moderating effect of gender. Journal of Contemporary Accounting, 8(1), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.20885/jca.vol8.iss1.art10
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Aggarwal, P., & Singh, R. K. (2022). Synthesizing the affinity between employees’ internal-external CSR perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic investigation. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(4), 1053–1101. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12451 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12451
  2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
  3. Bennett, R. J., & Robinson, S. L. (2000). Development of a measure of workplace deviance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 349–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.3.349
  4. Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in social exchange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1964.tb00583.x
  5. Brauchli, R., Jenny, G. J., Füllemann, D., & Bauer, G. F. (2015). Towards a Job Demands‐Resources health model: Empirical testing with generalizable indicators of job demands, job resources, and comprehensive health outcomes. BioMed Research International, 2015, Article 959621. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/959621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/959621
  6. Brough, P., Timms, C., Siu, O. L., Kalliath, T., O’Driscoll, M. P., Sit, C. H., ... & Lu, C. Q. (2013). Validation of the Job Demands-Resources model in cross-national samples: Cross-sectional and longitudinal predictions of psychological strain and work engagement. Human Relations, 66(10), 1311–1335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712472915 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726712472915
  7. Chang, Y. P., Hu, H. H., & Lin, C. M. (2021). Consistency or hypocrisy? The impact of internal corporate social responsibility on employee behavior: A moderated mediation model. Sustainability, 13(17), 9494. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179494 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179494
  8. Chatzopoulou, C. E., Dimitrios, C., & Vasia, M. (2022). Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: Interrelations of external and internal orientations with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(3), 795–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04872-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04872-7
  9. Chaudhary, R. (2018). Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: A study among Indian business executives. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(21), 2761–2784. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1469159 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1469159
  10. Chen, J. K., & Sriphon, T. (2022). Authentic leadership, trust, and social exchange relationships under the influence of leader behavior. Sustainability, 14(10), 5883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105883
  11. Chen, J. Q., Tang, T. L. P., & Tang, N. Y. (2014). Temptation, monetary intelligence (love of money), and environmental context on unethical intentions and cheating. Journal of Business Ethics, 123(2), 197–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1783-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1783-2
  12. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278–321. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2958
  13. Cook, K. S. (2015). Exchange: Social. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 8, pp. 482–488). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32056-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32056-6
  14. Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., & Diehl, M. R. (2018). Social exchange theory: Where is trust? In The Routledge companion to trust (pp. 197–217). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315745572-14
  15. De Roeck, K., & Maon, F. (2018). Building the theoretical puzzle of employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 149(3), 609–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3081-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3081-2
  16. Decuypere, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2021). Exploring the leadership–engagement nexus: A moderated meta-analysis and review of explaining mechanisms. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8592. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168592
  17. Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2007). Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.12.1.1
  18. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  19. Farid, T., Iqbal, S., Ma, J., Castro-González, S., Khattak, A., & Khan, M. K. (2019). Employees’ perceptions of CSR, work engagement, and organizational citizenship behavior: The mediating effects of organizational justice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101731 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16101731
  20. Farrukh, M., Sajid, M., Lee, J. W. C., & Shahzad, I. A. (2020). The perception of corporate social responsibility and employee engagement: Examining the underlying mechanism. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 760–768. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1842
  21. Freeman, R. E., & Moutchnik, A. (2013). Stakeholder management and CSR: Questions and answers. UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 21(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-013-0266-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00550-013-0266-3
  22. Freire, C., Gonçalves, J., & Carvalho, M. R. (2022). Corporate social responsibility: The impact of employees’ perceptions on organizational citizenship behavior through organizational identification. Administrative Sciences, 12(3), 120. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030120 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12030120
  23. George, N. A., Aboobaker, N., & Edward, M. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and organizational commitment: Effects of CSR attitude, organizational trust and identification. Society and Business Review, 15(3), 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-04-2020-0057 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-04-2020-0057
  24. Ghozali, I., & Latan, H. (2015). Partial least squares: Konsep, teknik dan aplikasi menggunakan program SmartPLS 3.0 (2nd ed.). Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
  25. Griep, Y., Vantilborgh, T., & Jones, S. K. (2020). The relationship between psychological contract breach and counterproductive work behavior in social enterprises: Do paid employees and volunteers differ? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 41(3), 727–745. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X17744029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X17744029
  26. Gullifor, D. P., Petrenko, O. V., Chandler, J. A., Quade, M. J., & Rouba, Y. (2023). Employee reactions to perceived CSR: The influence of the ethical environment on OCB engagement and individual performance. Journal of Business Research, 161, 113835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113835 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113835
  27. Hair, J. F., Jr., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: Updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624
  28. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
  29. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Mena, J. A. (2012). An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(3), 414–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0261-6
  30. Halbesleben, J. R. B., Harvey, J., & Bolino, M. C. (2009). Too engaged? A conservation of resources view of the relationship between work engagement and work interference with family. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1452–1465. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017595 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017595
  31. Han, X., Li, Q., & Wang, X. (2024). Investigating how corporate social responsibility affects employees’ thriving at work: A social exchange perspective. Sustainability, 16(3), 1095. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031095 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031095
  32. Hartono, J. M. (Ed.). (2018). Metoda pengumpulan dan teknik analisis data. Penerbit Andi.
  33. Hogg, M. A. (2018). Contemporary social psychological theories (P. J. Burke, Ed.; 2nd ed.). Stanford University Press.
  34. Holland, S. J., Shore, D. B., & Cortina, J. M. (2017). Review and recommendations for integrating mediation and moderation. Organizational Research Methods, 20(4), 686–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116658958 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116658958
  35. Honnamane, P. S., Sreekanth, K., & Girish, G. P. (2024). The moderating role of gender in the relationships among job characteristics, perceived organizational support, engaging leadership, and work engagement in the Indian IT sector. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Sciences, 11(8), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.08.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21833/ijaas.2024.08.006
  36. Hossen, M., Chan, T., & Mohd Hasan, N. A. (2020). Mediating role of job satisfaction on internal corporate social responsibility practices and employee engagement in higher education sector. Contemporary Management Research, 16(3), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.20334 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.20334
  37. Hur, W. M., Moon, T. W., & Ko, S. H. (2018). How employees’ perceptions of CSR increase employee creativity: Mediating mechanisms of compassion at work and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Business Ethics, 153(3), 629–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3321-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3321-5
  38. Jia, Y., Yan, J., Liu, T., & Huang, J. (2019). How does internal and external CSR affect employees’ work engagement? Exploring multiple mediation mechanisms and boundary conditions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2476. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142476 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142476
  39. Kaiser, S., Patras, J., Adolfsen, F., Richardsen, A. M., & Martinussen, M. (2020). Using the Job Demands–Resources model to evaluate work-related outcomes among Norwegian health care workers. SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020947436 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020947436
  40. Karazsia, B. T., Berlin, K. S., Armstrong, B., Janicke, D. M., & Darling, K. E. (2014). Integrating mediation and moderation to advance theory development and testing. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst080 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst080
  41. Kim, B., Jung, S., & Jung, J. (2022). Does a good firm diminish the bad behavior of its employees? The sequential mediation effect of organizational trust and organizational commitment, and the moderation effect of work overload. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(11), 6666. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116666 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19116666
  42. Kim, M., & Kim, J. (2021). Corporate social responsibility, employee engagement, well-being and the task performance of frontline employees. Management Decision, 59(8), 2040–2056. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2020-0268 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2020-0268
  43. Ko, S., Choi, Y., & Kim, J. (2023). Employees’ perceptions of corporate social responsibility and their extra-role behaviors: A psychological mechanism. Sustainability, 15(16), 12513. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813394
  44. Kulikowski, K., & Orzechowski, J. (2018). All employees need job resources – testing the Job Demands–Resources theory among employees with either high or low cognitive ability. Medycyna Pracy, 69(5), 483–496. https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.00713 DOI: https://doi.org/10.13075/mp.5893.00709
  45. Lämsä, A. M., & Keränen, A. (2020). Responsible leadership in the manager–employee relationship. South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, 9(3), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.1177/2277977920958543 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2277977920958543
  46. Latif, B., Ong, T. S., Meero, A., Aziz, A., & Rahman, A. (2022). Employee-perceived corporate social responsibility (CSR) and employee pro-environmental behavior (PEB): The moderating role of CSR skepticism and CSR authenticity. Sustainability, 14(3), 1380. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031380 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031380
  47. Lee, Y. (2020). Linking internal CSR with the positive communicative behaviors of employees: The role of social exchange relationships and employee engagement. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(3), 563–581. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2020-0121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2020-0121
  48. Loor-Zambrano, H. Y., Santos-Roldán, L., & Palacios-Florencio, B. (2022). Relationship CSR and employee commitment: Mediating effects of internal motivation and trust. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28(2), 100185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100185 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100185
  49. Lopez-Fernández, A. M. (2019). Internal corporate social responsibility and leadership effects on voice management and organisational performance: Analysis of collaborator perceptions across organisations in Mexico. International Journal of Business Excellence, 19(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2019.102236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2019.102236
  50. Mahmood, F., Qadeer, F., Abbas, Z., & Hussain, I. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and employees’ negative behaviors under abusive supervision: A multilevel insight. Sustainability, 12(7), 2948. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072948 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072647
  51. McGregor, A., Magee, C. A., Caputi, P., & Iverson, D. (2016). A job demands-resources approach to presenteeism. Career Development International, 21(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2016-0002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2016-0002
  52. Memon, K. R. (2020). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee engagement - A social exchange perspective. Journal of Management Sciences, 7(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20547/jms.2014.2007101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.69864/ijbsam.15-1.135
  53. Memon, K. R., Zada, M., Ghani, B., Ullah, R., & Vega-Muñoz, A. (2021). Linking corporate social responsibility to workplace deviant behaviors: Mediating role of job satisfaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 803481. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.803481 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.803481
  54. Memon, M. A., Thurasamy, R., Ting, H., & Cheah, J. H. (2025). Purposive sampling: A review and guidelines for quantitative research. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.9(1)01
  55. Mendes, T., Silva, P., Ferreira, M. R., Proenca, T., & Borges, A. (2025). Beyond responsibility: Unveiling the impact of gender and culture on CSR-driven employee engagement. Social Responsibility Journal, 21(10), 2133–2151. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2024-0910 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-12-2024-0910
  56. Mostafa, A. M., Boon, C., Abouarghoub, W., & Cai, Z. (2022). High-commitment HRM, organizational engagement, and deviant workplace behaviors: The moderating role of person-organization fit. European Management Review, 19(3), 410–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12542 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12542
  57. Mostafa, A. M. S., & Shen, J. (2019). Ethical leadership, internal CSR, organisational engagement and organisational workplace deviance. Evidence-based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 8(1), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-03-2019-0026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/EBHRM-03-2019-0026
  58. Musleh, N., & Cross, C. (2025). Social exchange theory. In Theories and concepts in work and employment relations (pp. 92–98). Edward Elgar Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035316205.00019
  59. Ntalianis, F., & Bouranta, N. (2025). Internal vs external: How CSR practices drive employee engagement and why meaningfulness and gender matter. Employee Relations, Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2024-0375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-07-2024-0375
  60. Obeid, M., Shbail, A., Alshurafat, H., Ensour, W., & Al-Hiyari, A. (2025). Exploring the impact of internal CSR on auditor turnover intentions: The mediating and moderating roles of job satisfaction, organisational commitment, and job complexity. Acta Psychologica, 256, 104256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.104256 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105012
  61. Oh, S. H., Hur, W. M., & Kim, H. (2023). Employee creativity in socially responsible companies: Moderating effects of intrinsic and prosocial motivation. Current Psychology, 42(21), 18178–18196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02852-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-02852-2
  62. Olorunsola, V. O., Saydam, M. B., Ogunmokun, O. A., & Ozturen, A. (2022). Service beyond the status quo: The ripple effect of corporate social responsibility and internal marketing on employee’s customer-oriented behavior. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 40(4), 820–841. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2021-0317 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-07-2021-0321
  63. Park, S., Lee, C., & Kim, H. (2017). The influence of corporate social responsibility on travel company employees. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(1), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2016-0372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2016-0372
  64. Paruzel, A., Klug, H. J. P., & Maier, G. W. (2021). The relationship between perceived corporate social responsibility and employee-related outcomes: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 607108. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.607108
  65. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
  66. Ramdhan, R. M., Kisahwan, D., & Winarno, A. (2022). Internal corporate social responsibility as a microfoundation of employee well-being and job performance. Sustainability, 14(19), 12157. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912157 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159065
  67. Ranjan, S., & Dash, S. (2022). Impact of internal corporate social responsibility: A parallel mediation analysis. Personnel Review, 53(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2020-0354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-05-2020-0354
  68. Ren, X., Li, J., Wang, X., & Lei, X. (2024). Female directors and CSR: Does the presence of female directors affect CSR focus? International Review of Financial Analysis, 92, 103101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103101
  69. Rich, B. L., LePine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468988
  70. Robinson, S. L., & Bennett, R. J. (1995). A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: A multidimensional scaling study. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 555–572. https://doi.org/10.2307/256693 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/256693
  71. Sánchez-Hernández, M. I., Vázquez-Burguete, J. L., García-Miguélez, M. P., & Lanero-Carrizo, A. (2021). Internal corporate social responsibility for sustainability. Sustainability, 13(21), 11883. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111883 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147920
  72. Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Treating unobserved heterogeneity in PLS-SEM: A multi-method approach. In Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 197–217). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_9
  73. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2004). Utrecht Work Engagement Scale: Preliminary manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University.
  74. Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164405282471
  75. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
  76. Scheidler, S., Edinger-Schons, L. M., Spanjol, J., & Wieseke, J. (2019). Scrooge posing as Mother Teresa: How hypocritical social responsibility strategies hurt employees and firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 157(2), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3788-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3788-3
  77. Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
  78. Story, J. S. P., & Castanheira, F. (2019). Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: Mediation role of job satisfaction and affective commitment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(6), 1361–1370. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1752
  79. Texas, A., & States, U. (2020). Investigating the impact of workforce racial diversity on the organizational corporate social responsibility performance: An institutional logics perspective. Journal of Business Research, 107, 138–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.018
  80. Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: A scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9780-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9780-6
  81. Van, L. T., Le, D. L., Ngo, T. L. N., & Ferreira, J. (2024). The impact of internal social responsibility on service employees’ job satisfaction and organizational engagement. Service Business, 18(1), 101–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-024-00555-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-024-00555-1
  82. Vinod Nair, A., McGregor, A., & Caputi, P. (2020). The impact of challenge and hindrance demands on burnout, work engagement, and presenteeism: A cross-sectional study using the Job Demands-Resources model. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 62(8), e392–e397. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001908 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001908
  83. Virador, L. B., & Chen, F. (2022). Does an (in)congruent corporate social responsibility strategy affect employees’ turnover intention? A configurational analysis in an emerging country. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 31(4), 1145–1161. https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12475 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12475
  84. Vu, V. V. (2024). Does job satisfaction mediate the relationship between corporate social responsibility and employee organizational citizenship behavior? Evidence from the hotel industry in Vietnam. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 7(3), 1017–1029. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i3.3012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v7i3.3012
  85. Wang, W., Fu, Y., Qiu, H., Moore, J. H., & Wang, Z. (2017). Corporate social responsibility and employee outcomes: A moderated mediation model of organizational identification and moral identity. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1906. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01906 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01906
  86. Zhang, M., Zhao, L., & Chen, Z. (2021). Research on the relationship between high-commitment work systems and employees’ unethical pro-organizational behavior: The moderating role of balanced reciprocity beliefs. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 776904. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.776904 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.776904
  87. Zhao, X., Wu, C., Chen, C. C., & Zhou, Z. (2022). The influence of corporate social responsibility on incumbent employees: A meta-analytic investigation of the mediating and moderating mechanisms. Journal of Management, 48(1), 114–146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320946108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320946108
  88. Zheng, J., Zhang, Z., Wu, G., Yang, Y., Xia, N., & Liu, B. (2021). Daily self-efficacy, work engagement, and deviance behavior among construction professionals and workers: Cross-level moderating role of job control. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4), 04021018. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0002022
  89. Zulfiqar, S., Sadaf, R., Popp, J., & Vveinhardt, J. (2019). An examination of corporate social responsibility and employee behavior: The case of Pakistan. Sustainability, 11(13), 3515. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133515 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11133515