Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 756 Download : 882

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – The aim of the study is to identify the antecedents of the Indonesian Muslim customers' intention to use Islamic mobile payments.

Methodology – The data were collected from 437 respondents, i.e., 216 potential users and 221 actual users of Islamic mobile payments. The data were analyzed using a partial least squares structural equation model (PLS-SEM).

Findings – The study shows that performance expectancy, perceived religiosity obligation, compatibility, and perceived trust had positive effects on the behavioral intention of Muslim customers. For multi-group analysis, perceived religiosity obligation and compatibility have a significant effect on actual and potential users. Perceived trust significantly influences actual users' behavioral intentions, whereas social influence only significantly affects potential users.

Originality – The study was conducted on Islamic mobile payment using actual users and potential users as respondents. The study will contribute to the development of theories on the adoption of technology and Muslim consumers.

Keywords

Islamic mobile payment Muslim customers Behavioral intention

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Exval Mahendra Saputro, Sri Rahayu Hijrah Hati

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Saputro, E. M., & Hati, S. R. H. (2021). The antecedents of Muslim customers’ behavioral intention towards Islamic mobile payment. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 7(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol7.iss2.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abrahão, R. de S., Moriguchi, S. N., & Andrade, D. F. (2016). Intention of adoption of mobile payment: An analysis in the light of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT). RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 13(3), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.06.003
  2. Alalwan, A. A. (2018). Examining adoption of mobile internet in Saudi Arabia_ Extending TAM with perceived enjoyment, innovativeness and trust. Technology in Society, 11.
  3. Amin, H., Rahim Abdul Rahman, A., Laison Sondoh, S., & Magdalene Chooi Hwa, A. (2011). Determinants of customers' intention to use Islamic personal financing: The case of Malaysian Islamic banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 2(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590811111129490
  4. Au, Y. A., & Kauffman, R. J. (2008). The economics of mobile payments: Understanding stakeholder issues for an emerging financial technology application. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2006.12.004
  5. Bananuka, J., Kasera, M., Najjemba, G. M., Musimenta, D., Ssekiziyivu, B., & Kimuli, S. N. L. (2019). Attitude: Mediator of subjective norm, religiosity and intention to adopt Islamic banking. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2018-0025
  6. Choi, H., Park, J., Kim, J., & Jung, Y. (2020). Consumer preferences of attributes of mobile payment services in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics, 51, 101397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101397
  7. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 23.
  8. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
  9. de Luna, I. R., Montoro-Ríos, F., Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & de Luna, J. G. (2017). NFC technology acceptance for mobile payments: A Brazilian Perspective. Review of Business Management., 19(63), 23.
  10. Gefen, Karahanna, & Straub. (2003). Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519
  11. Gupta, K., & Arora, N. (2019). Investigating consumer intention to accept mobile payment systems through unified theory of acceptance model: An Indian perspective. South Asian Journal of Business Studies, 9(1), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAJBS-03-2019-0037
  12. Handarkho, Y. D., Harjoseputro, Y., Samodra, J. E., & Irianto, A. B. P. (2021). Understanding proximity mobile payment continuance usage in Indonesia from a habit perspective. Journal of Asia Business Studies, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-02-2020-0046
  13. Hasan, A., & Gupta, S. K. (2020). Exploring Tourists' Behavioural Intentions Towards Use of Select Mobile Wallets for Digital Payments. Paradigm, 24(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971890720959519
  14. Iman, N. (2018). Is mobile payment still relevant in the fintech era? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 30, 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2018.05.009
  15. Jaffar, M. A., & Musa, R. (2014). Determinants of Attitude towards Islamic Financing among Halal-certified Micro and SMEs: A Preliminary Investigation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 130, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.04.017
  16. Jamshidi, D., & Hussin, N. (2016). Forecasting patronage factors of Islamic credit card as a new e-commerce banking service: An integration of TAM with perceived religiosity and trust. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 7(4), 378–404. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-07-2014-0050
  17. Johan, Z. J., Hussain, M. Z., Mohd, R., & Kamaruddin, B. H. (2020). Muslims and non-Muslims intention to hold Shariah-compliant credit cards: A SmartPLS approach. Journal of Islamic Marketing, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-12-2019-0270
  18. KNEKS. (2019, April 1). Kebutuhan Digital Payment Syariah Sangat Mendesak. https://www.knks.go.id/isuutama/12/kebutuhan-digital-payment-syariah-sangat-mendesak
  19. KNEKS. (2020, April 17). Layanan Syariah LinkAja Resmi Diluncurkan. Komite Nasional Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Syariah. https://knks.go.id/berita/234/layanan-syariah-linkaja-resmi-diluncurkan?category=1
  20. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., de Luna, I. R., & Montoro-Ríos, F. (2017). Intention to use new mobile payment systems: A comparative analysis of SMS and NFC payments. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30`(1), 892–910.
  21. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., Sánchez-Fernández, J., & Muñoz-Leiva, F. (2014). The moderating effect of experience in the adoption of mobile payment tools in Virtual Social Networks: The m-Payment Acceptance Model in Virtual Social Networks (MPAM-VSN). International Journal of Information Management, 34(2), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.006
  22. Lin, W. R., Lin, C.-Y., & Ding, Y.-H. (2020). Factors Affecting the Behavioral Intention to Adopt Mobile Payment: An Empirical Study in Taiwan. Mathematics, 8(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/math8101851
  23. Linkaja. (2020, April 14). LinkAja Luncurkan Layanan Syariah Pertama di Indonesia. https://www.linkaja.id
  24. Liu, Z., Ben, S., & Zhang, R. (2019). Factors affecting consumers' mobile payment behavior: A meta-analysis. Electronic Commerce Research.
  25. Luarn, P., & Lin, H.-H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873–891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.003
  26. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.
  27. Moorthy, K., Chun T'ing, L., Chea Yee, K., Wen Huey, A., Joe In, L., Chyi Feng, P., & Jia Yi, T. (2020). What drives the adoption of mobile payment? A Malaysian perspective. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 25(3), 349–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1756
  28. Mouakket, S. (2020). Investigating the role of mobile payment quality characteristics in the United Arab Emirates: Implications for emerging economies. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(7), 1465–1490. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBM-03-2020-0139
  29. MUI. (2017). Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional Majelis Ulama Indonesia No: 1161DSN. MUUI!W 2017 Tentang Uang Elektronik Syariah.
  30. MUI. (2018, July 23). Ini Fatwa Terbaru DSN-MUI tentang Uang Elektronik dan Layanan Pembiayaan Berbasis IT. Majelis Ulama Indonesia. https://mui.or.id/berita/11352/ini-fatwa-terbaru-dsn-mui-tentang-uang-elektronik-dan-layanan-pembiayaan-berbasis-it/
  31. Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., Baptista, G., & Campos, F. (2016). Mobile payment: Understanding the determinants of customer adoption and intention to recommend the technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 61, 404–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.030
  32. Ozturk, A. B., Bilgihan, A., Salehi-Esfahani, S., & Hua, N. (2017). Understanding the mobile payment technology acceptance based on valence theory: A case of restaurant transactions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(8), 2027–2049. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-04-2016-0192
  33. Patil, P., Tamilmani, K., Rana, N. P., & Raghavan, V. (2020). Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102144
  34. Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2003.11044275
  35. Phonthanukitithaworn, C., Sellitto, C., & Fong, M. W. L. (2016). A Comparative Study of Current and Potential Users of Mobile Payment Services. SAGE Open, 6(4), 215824401667539. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016675397
  36. Prayoga, F. (2020, December 15). Potensi Ekonomi Syariah Indonesia Luar Biasa, Begini Faktanya: Okezone Tren. https://www.okezone.com/. https://www.okezone.com/tren/read/2020/12/15/620/2327880/potensi-ekonomi-syariah-indonesia-luar-biasa-begini-faktanya
  37. Putri, A. F., Handayani, P. W., & Shihab, M. R. (2020). Environment factors affecting individual's continuance usage of mobile payment technology in Indonesia. Cogent Engineering, 7(1), 1846832. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2020.1846832
  38. Rahi, S., Othman Mansour, M. M., Alghizzawi, M., & Alnaser, F. M. (2019). Integration of UTAUT model in internet banking adoption context: The mediating role of performance expectancy and effort expectancy. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 13(3), 411–435. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0032
  39. Ramdhani, A., Alamanda, D. T., Faculty of Economics, Garut University, Indonesia, Harisana, M. H., & Akbar, G. G. (2020). The Factors that Determine Interest to Use of Mobile Payment: Study on the Students of Garut University, Indonesia. The Asian Journal of Technology Management (AJTM), 13(3), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.12695/ajtm.2020.13.3.6
  40. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations.
  41. Schierz, P. G., Schilke, O., & Wirtz, B. W. (2010). Understanding consumer acceptance of mobile payment services: An empirical analysis. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8.
  42. Sobti, N. (2019). Impact of demonetization on diffusion of mobile payment service in India: Antecedents of behavioral intention and adoption using extended UTAUT model. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 16(4), 472–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAMR-09-2018-0086
  43. Suhartadi, I. (2020, February 26). RI Berpotensi Jadi Pemain Utama di Industri Keuangan Syariah Dunia. investor.id. https://investor.id/finance/ri-berpotensi-jadi-pemain-utama-di-industri-keuangan-syariah-dunia
  44. Suhartanto, D., Dean, D., Ismail, T. A. T., & Sundari, R. (2019). Mobile banking adoption in Islamic banks: Integrating TAM model and religiosity-intention model. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(6), 1405–1418. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2019-0096
  45. Tan, E., & Leby Lau, J. (2016). Behavioural intention to adopt mobile banking among the millennial generation. Young Consumers, 17(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2015-00537
  46. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
  47. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412
  48. Wu, & Wang. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? Information & Management, 42(5), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2004.07.001
  49. Zhang, L., Zhu, J., & Liu, Q. (2012). A meta-analysis of mobile commerce adoption and the moderating effect of culture. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(5), 1902–1911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.008
  50. Zhou, T. (2011). The effect of initial trust on user adoption of mobile payment. Information Development, 27(4), 290–300. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666911424075