Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1480 Download : 1483

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – We intended to test and compare the durability of Islamic banking and conventional banking during the Covid-19 pandemic in Indonesia. To that end, we first compared their performance before and during the pandemic. Next, we examined the effects of pandemic shocks on the performance of each of them.

Methodology – The data covers 80 banks in Indonesia, which were divided into four groups, namely Islamic and conventional commercial banks, and Islamic and conventional rural banks. Each group consisted of 20 banks. Our observation period is 10 quarters, which was divided into two periods, namely the period before the pandemic (Q1-2019 – Q1-2020) and the period during the pandemic (Q2-2020 – Q2-2021). For comparison, we used a paired sample t-test, while testing the effect of shocks using a panel regression model.

Findings – Islamic banking outperformed conventional banking, both before and during the Covid-19 pandemic. The Covid-19 pandemic has predominantly shaken conventional banking indicators and has only slightly shaken Islamic banking. However, this does not mean Islamic banks were superior to their conventional counterparts because both were shaken, it's just that conventional banks experienced a bigger shock than their Islamic counterparts.

Originality – This is an original study that examines and compares the performance between Islamic and conventional banking using financial ratios during the Covid-19 pandemic.

Keywords

Islamic economics Islamic finance Islamic banking Covid-19 Pandemic

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 I Made Dauh Wijana, I Wayan Windnyana

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Wijana, I. M. D., & Widnyana, I. W. (2022). Is Islamic banking stronger than conventional banking during the Covid-19 pandemic? Evidence from Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 8(1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol8.iss1.art9
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abdulle, M. Y., & Kassim, S. H. (2012). Impact of global financial crisis on the performance of Islamic and conventional banks: Empirical evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 8(4), 9-20. https://platform.almanhal.com/Files/Articles/22674
  2. Alaro, A. R., & Hakeem, M. (2011). Financial engineering and financial stability: The role of Islamic financial system. Journal of Islamic Economics, Banking and Finance, 7(1), 25-38. https://platform.almanhal.com/Files/Articles/22553
  3. Alqahtani, F., & Mayes, D. G. (2018). Financial stability of Islamic banking and the global financial crisis: Evidence from the Gulf Cooperation Council. Economic Systems, 42(2), 346-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2017.09.001
  4. Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: business model, efficiency, and stability. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(2), 433-447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.09.016
  5. Bourkhis, K., & Nabi, M. S. (2013). Islamic and conventional banks soundness during the 2007-2008 financial crisis. Review of Financial Economics, 22(2), 68-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2013.01.001
  6. Cihak, M., & Hesse, H. (2010). Islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Services Research, 38(1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-010-0089-0
  7. Chakroun, M. A., & Gallali, M. I. (2015). Islamic banks and financial stability: An empirical analysis of Gulf countries. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 5(3), 64-87. https://ijbcnet.com/5-3/IJBC-15-5212.pdf
  8. Farooq, M., & Zaheer, S. (2015). Are Islamic banks more resilient during financial panics? Pacific Economic Review, 20(1), 101-124. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12096
  9. Hasan, M. M., & Dridi, J. (2011). The effects of the global crisis on Islamic and conventional banks: A comparative study. IMF Working Paper, No. 10/201. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1750689
  10. Imam, K., & Kpaodar, K. (2010). Islamic banking: How has it diffused?. IMF Working Paper Series, 3. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/journals/001/2010/195/article-A001-en.xml
  11. Karim, B. A., Lee, W. S., Karim, Z. A., & Jais, M. (2012). The impact of subprime mortgage crisis on Islamic banking and Islamic stock market. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 668-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.182
  12. Kassim, S. H., & Majid, M. S. A. (2010). Impact of financial shocks on Islamic banks: Malaysian evidence during 1997 and 2007 financial crises. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 3(4), 291-305. https://doi/10.1108/17538391011093243
  13. Miah, M. D., & Uddin, H. (2017). Efficiency and stability: A comparative study between Islamic and conventional banks in GCC countries. Future Business Journal, 3(2), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.11.001
  14. Nugroho, M. R., Kurnia, A. S., Qoyum, A., & Fardila, F. (2020). The resilience of the Indonesian banking system and macroeconomic fluctuation: Islamic versus conventional banking. Journal of Islamic Monetary, Economics, anf Finance, 6(2), 419-438. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v6i2.1135
  15. Odeduntan, A. K., Adewale, A. A., & Hamisu, S. (2016). Financial stability of Islamic banks: Empirical evidence. Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 4(1), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.15640/jibf.v4n1a5
  16. Rahim, S. R. M., & Zakaria, R. H. (2013). Comparison on stability between Islamic and conventional banks in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Economic, Banking and Finance, 9(3), 131-149. https://platform.almanhal.com/Files/2/40149
  17. Rajhi, W., & Hassairi, S. A. (2013). Islamic banks and financial stability: A comparative empirical analysis between MENA and Southeast Asian countries. Region et Development, 37(1), 149-177. https://regionetdeveloppement.univ-tln.fr/wp-content/uploads/7_Rajhi.pdf
  18. Rasyid, A., Yousaf, S., & Khaleequzzaman, M. (2017). Does Islamic banking really strengthen financial stability? Empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 10(2), 130-148. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-11-2015-0137
  19. Shahid, M. A., & Abbas, Z. (2012). Financial stability of Islamic banking in Pakistan: An empirical study. African Journal of Business Management, 6(10). 3706-3714. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.1306
  20. Wahid, M. A., & Dar, H. (2016). Stability of Islamic versus conventional banks: A Malaysian case. Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia, 50(1), 111-132. https://111-132. 10.17576/JEM-2016-5001-09