Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1217 Download : 3126

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to investigate whether the Islamic banking industry in Indonesia and Malaysia is collusive or efficient. Indonesian Islamic banking is expected to meet the Qualified ASEAN Bank (QAB) to compete with other Islamic banks, including Malaysia.
Methodology – The data used in this study was panel data on Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia from January 2010 to December 2019. Data analysis employed static panel data regression.
Findings – The findings of the study disclosed no collusive behavior from Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia to increase profitability. Meanwhile, market share has been shown to boost profitability in terms of equity, despite the fact that there is an endogeneity problem. Technical efficiency and scale efficiency in Islamic banking in Indonesia have been shown to significantly increase market share, but not profitability and market power. This study concludes that if Islamic banking market in Indonesia and Malaysia are opened and state boundaries are lifted, Indonesian Islamic banking still will not be able to compete since it has not been able to acquire economies of scale.
Implications – Islamic banking in Indonedia needs to establish Islamic-Finance-Friendly Regulations. It is expected to pave the way for the value-added character of Islamic banking, it is the most important strategy to boost market share of Indonesian Islamic banking.
Originality – This study seeks to fill the validation gap of endogeneity test in Islamic banking. There is the limitation on studies of Islamic banks since the validation of endogeneity test deal only with conventional banking studies.

Keywords

Market Structure Efficiency Profitability Panel Regression Data Envelopment Analysis

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Chajar Matari Fath Mala, M Nadratuzzaman Hosen, M Nur Rianto Al Arif

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Mala, C. M. F., Hosen, M. N., & Al Arif, M. N. R. (2023). An analysis of market power and efficiency of Islamic banking in Indonesia and Malaysia. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.20885/JEKI.vol9.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abdullah, A. (2017). A comparison between Malaysia and Indonesia in Islamic banking industry. Pressacademia, 4(3), 276–286. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2017.705
  2. Al Arif, M. N., & Awwaliyah, T. B. (2019). Market share, concentration ratio and profitability: Evidence from Indonesian Islamic banking Industry. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 8(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2019-0020
  3. Ashraf, D., Rizwan, M. S., & L’Huillier, B. (2016). A net stable funding ratio for Islamic banks and its impact on financial stability: An international investigation. Journal of Financial Stability, 25, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2016.06.010
  4. Ayadi, I., & Ellouze, A. (2013). Market structure and performance of Tunisian banks. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 3(2), 345–354. https://www.econjournals.com/index.php/ijefi/article/view/374
  5. Basri, M. F. (2020). Competition and market structure of the Malaysian Islamic banking industry. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 11(3), 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2017-0127
  6. Bektas, E. (2006). Test of market structure and profitability in liberalizing the deposit market: The case of North Cyprus. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 4(2), 62–67. https://www.businessperspectives.org/images/pdf/applications/publishing/templates/article/assets/528/PPM_EN_2006_02_Bektas.pdf
  7. Berger, A. N. (1995). The profit-structure relationship in banking tests of market-power and efficient-structure hypotheses. Journal of Money,Credit and Banking, 27(2), 404–431. https://doi.org/10.2307/2077876
  8. Berger, A. N., & Hannan, H. (1989). The price-concentration relationship in anking. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(2), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1926975
  9. Boyd, J. H., & De Nicoló, G. (2005). The theory of bank risk taking and competition revisited. Journal of Finance, 60(3), 1329–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00763.x
  10. Chabachib, M., Windriya, A., Robiyanto, R., & Hersugondo, H. (2019). A comparative study of Indonesian and Malaysian Islamic banks. Banks and Bank Systems, 14(4), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.14(4).2019.06
  11. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  12. Chortareas, G. E., Garza-Garcia, J. G., & Girardone, C. (2011). Banking sector performance in Latin America: Market power versus efficiency. Review of Development Economics, 15(2), 307–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9361.2011.00610.x
  13. Fitriyanti, E. (2015). Analysis of determinants of structure, behavior and performance of the Islamic banking industry in Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan, 32(2), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.29259/ja.v9i1.8798
  14. Gajurel, D. P., & Pradhan, R. S. (2011). Structure-performance relation in Nepalese banking industry. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research (IPEDR), 2, 25–31. http://www.ipedr.com/vol2/6-P00011.pdf
  15. Gilbert, R. A. (2012). Bank market structure and competition. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 16(4), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.2307/1992096
  16. Goldberg, L. G., & Rai, A. (1996). The structure-performance relationship for European banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 20, 745–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4266(95)00021-6
  17. Ha, D., Gillet, P., Le, P., & Vo, D. T. (2020). Banking integration in ASEAN-6: An empirical investigation. Economic Modelling, 91, 705–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2019.09.017
  18. Hosen, M. N., & Fitria, S. (2018). The performance of Islamic rural banks in Indonesia: 2010-2015. European Research Studies Journal, 21(Special Issue 3), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1393
  19. Kamarudin, F., Sufian, F., Loong, F. W., & Anwar, N. A. M. (2017). Assessing the domestic and foreign Islamic banks efficiency: Insights from selected Southeast Asian countries. Future Business Journal, 3(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.01.005
  20. Kemu, S. Z. (2017). The readiness of Indonesia’s banks facing ASEAN Economic Community (AEC). Information Management and Business Review, 9(3), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.22610/imbr.v9i3.1775
  21. Khan, H. H., & Kutan, A. M. (2021). Testing the structure-conduct-performance relationship for ASEAN: Addressing the issues in the panel mediation. Journal of Asian Economics, 72, 101269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2020.101269
  22. Khan, M. ul H., & Hanif, M. N. (2019). Empirical evaluation of ‘structure-conduct-performance’ and ‘efficient-structure’ paradigms in banking sector of Pakistan. International Review of Applied Economics, 33(5), 682–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/02692171.2018.1518411
  23. Kuswahariani, W., Siregar, H., & Syarifuddin, F. (2020). Analysis of non-performing financing (NPF) in general and the micro segment at three national Islamic banks in Indonesia. Jurnal Aplikasi Bisnis Dan Manajemen, 6(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.17358/jabm.6.1.26
  24. Maghfuriyah, A., Ferdous Azam, S. M., & Shukri, S. (2019). Market structure and islamic banking performance in indonesia: An error correction model. Management Science Letters, 9(9), 1407–1418. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.010
  25. Malini, H., & Putri, A. N. (2020). Competitiveness and market concentration of Islamic banking industry: A comparison study between Indonesia and Malaysia. Sriwijaya International Journal of Dynamic Economics and Business, 4(3), 175. https://doi.org/10.29259/sijdeb.v4i3.175-190
  26. Maudos, J., & Fernández de Guevara, J. (2004). Factors explaining the interest margin in the banking sectors of the European Union. Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(9), 2259–2281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2003.09.004
  27. Mirzaei, A., Moore, T., & Liu, G. (2013). Does market structure matter on banks’ profitability and stability? Emerging vs. advanced economies. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(8), 2920–2937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.04.031
  28. Mokhtar, H. S. A., Abdullah, N., & Alhabshi, S. M. (2008). Efficiency and competition of Islamic banking in Malaysia. Humanomics, 24(1), 28–48. https://doi.org/10.1108/08288660810851450
  29. Nasri, R., & Nuraini. (2019). The measurement of bank’s performance; risk profile, good corporate governance, earning and capital to fulfill the qualified ASEAN Bank’s criteria. KnE Social Sciences, 2019(33), 337–349. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i26.5385
  30. Naylah, M., & Cahyaningratri, C. (2020). The influence of market structure in Indonesian banking performance. Journal of Economics and Policy, 13(1), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.15294/jejak.v13i1.21458
  31. Popita, M. S. A. (2013). Analisis penyebab terjadinya non-performing financing pada bank umum syariah di Indonesia. Accounting Analysis Journal, 2(4), 404–412. http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/aaj
  32. Putra, R. N. A. (2019). Karakteristik pembiayaan dan non-performing financing perbankan syariah 2015–2018. MALIA: Journal of Islamic Banking and Finance, 3(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.21043/malia.v3i1.5666
  33. Rahmat, SIP., M. H. (2020). Intellectual capital, bank size, bank market share, and efficiency of conventional banks in Indonesia. Revista CEA, 6(11), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.22430/24223182.1457
  34. Rulindo, R., Hidayat, S. E. H., Rifqi, M., & Istiqomah, R. (2022). Prioritizing strategies to boost market share of Islamic banking industry in Indonesia. Heliyon, 1–35. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4124991
  35. Smirlock, M. (1985). Evidence on the (non) relationship between concentration and profitability in banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(1), 69. https://doi.org/10.2307/1992507
  36. Suryasnia, S., Primiana, I., Sucherly, & Herwany, A. (2020). Banking strategy and implementation of ASEAN Banking Integration Framework (ABIF) in ASEAN Community (AEC)’s era 2020. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Banking, 73303. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/73303/
  37. Tabak, B. M., Gomes, G. M. R., & Da Silva Medeiros, M. (2014). The impact of market power at bank level in risk-taking: The Brazilian case. International Review of Financial Analysis, 40, 154–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2015.05.014
  38. VanHoose, D. (2010). The industrial organization of banking: Bank behavior, market structure, and regulation. Springer. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-02821-2
  39. Widarjono, A., Mifrahi, M. N., & Perdana, A. R. A. (2020). Determinants of Indonesian Islamic rural banks’ profitability: Collusive or non-collusive behavior? Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(11), 657–668. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no11.657
  40. Wong, J., Fong, T., Wong, T. C., & Choi, K. (2011). Determinants of the performance of banks in Hong Kong. SSRN Electronic Journal, September, 5–15. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1032032
  41. Ye, Q., Xu, Z., & Fang, D. (2012). Market structure, performance, and efficiency of the Chinese banking sector. Economic Change and Restructuring, 45(4), 337–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-012-9123-6
  42. Yu, P., & Neus, W. (2005). Market structure, scale efficiency , and risk as determinants of German banking profitability. Working Paper University of Tuebingen, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences. 294, 1–36. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/22093