Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 486 Download : 1442

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to explore and understand how the mindset of merchant women in Montong Traditional Market so choose loan sharks as their loan source, which refers to the perspective of behavior and financial literacy.
Methodology – This qualitative research with a Schutz phenomenological design, takes the research setting in Montong Traditional Market, Tuban. Data were collected through observation, interviews, and documentation.
Findings – The results of the study show five biased of merchant women towards loan sharks, namely confirmation bias, framing, herding effect, hindsight bias, and representativeness. 'Agamis' in the merchant women in Montong Traditional Market does not guarantee that she is free from loan sharks.
Implications – The results of this study indicate that related parties, such as religious leaders, the society leader, and cooperatives in Montong Traditional Market, Tuban, are expected to be able to increase education related to financial literacy through existing programs effectively and efficiently. Banks and cooperatives in the Montong Traditional Market area should be able to pick up the ball by providing door-to-door services to merchant women in Montong Traditional Market as a maximum effort to eradicate loan shark practices.
Originality – This study explores the mindset of merchant women on loan sharks, whereas previous studies related to loan sharks have only explored them from an economic perspective.

Keywords

loan shark financial behavior financial literacy biased behavior merchant women

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Novita Rahayu Pratiwi, Nur Khusniyah Indrawati, Risna Wijayanti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Pratiwi, N. R., Indrawati, N. K., & Wijayanti, R. (2023). Biased behavior in borrowing from loan sharks. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 9(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.20885/JEKI.vol9.iss1.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aktaruzzaman, K., & Farooq, O. (2020). Microfinance and domestic violence. Journal of Adult Protection, 22(5), 333–351. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAP-05-2020-0014
  2. Allen, F., Otchere, I., & Senbet, L. W. (2011). African financial systems: A review. Review of Development Finance, 1(2), 79–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rdf.2011.03.003
  3. Ares, R. L., López, S. F., González, S. C., & Pazos, D. R. (2021). Does self-control constitute a driver of millennials’ financial behaviors and attitudes? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2021.101702
  4. Begum, H., Alam, A. S. A. F., Mia, M. A., Bhuiyan, F., & Ghani, A. B. A. (2019). Development of Islamic microfinance: A sustainable poverty reduction approach. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 35(3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/jeas-01-2018-0007
  5. Cossa, A., Madaleno, M., & Mota, J. (2022). Financial literacy environment scan in Mozambique. Asia Pacific Management Review, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.09.004
  6. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education. Inc. http://repository.unmas.ac.id/medias/journal/EBK-00121.pdf
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publication. Inc. https://www.ucg.ac.me/skladiste/blog_609332/objava_105202/fajlovi/Creswell.pdf
  8. Dew, J., & Xiao, J. J. (2011). The financial management behavior scale: Development and validation. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 22(1), 43–59. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/256019544_The_Financial_Management_Behavior_Scale_Development_and_Validation
  9. Dowla, A. (2006). In credit we trust: Building social capital by Grameen Bank in Bangladesh. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 35(1), 102–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2005.12.006
  10. Du, X., & Zeng, Q. (2019). Bringing religion back in: Religious entrepreneurs, entrepreneurial gender, and bank loans in Chinese family firms. Asian Review of Accounting, 27(4), 508–545. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARA-04-2018-0097
  11. Emzir. (2010). Analisis data: Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Rajawali Pers.
  12. Fatchan. (2011). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Jenggal Pustaka Utama.
  13. Handayani, W., Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2018). A bourdieusian perspective in exploring the emergence and evolution of the field of Islamic microfinance in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(4), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-10-2017-0142
  14. Kawamura, T., Mori, T., Motonishi, T., & Ogawa, K. (2021). Is financial literacy dangerous? financial literacy, behavioral factors, and financial choices of households. Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 60(January), 101131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2021.101131
  15. Lubis, M. R. (2017). Agama dan perdamaian: Landasan, tujuan, dan realitas kehidupan. PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  16. Mangunwijaya, Y. B. (1982). Sastra dan religiusitas. Sinar Harapan.
  17. Misra, R., Srivastava, S., & Banwet, D. K. (2019). Do religious and conscious investors make better economic decisions? Evidence from India. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 22, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2019.02.003
  18. Nasar, M. F. (2018). Capita selecta zakat: Esei-esei zakat aksi kolektif melawan kemiskinan. Gre Publishing.
  19. Noerhidajati, S., Purwoko, A. B., Werdaningtyas, H., Kamil, A. I., & Dartanto, T. (2021). Household financial vulnerability in Indonesia: Measurement and determinants. Economic Modelling, 96, 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.03.028
  20. Raliby, O. (1982), Kamus internasional. Bulan Bintang.
  21. Pandey, B., Bandyopadhyay, P., & Guiette, A. (2019). Impact of different sources of credit in creating extreme farmer distress in India. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 26(6), 1676–1691. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2018-0321
  22. Parlina, Y. (2017). Praktik pinjaman rentenir dan perkembangan usaha pedagang di pasar Prapatan Panjalin Majalengka. Inklusif, Jurnal Pengkajian Penelitian Ekonomi dan Hukum Islam, 2(2), 100. https://doi.org/10.24235/inklusif.v2i2.1938
  23. Prijadi, R., Wulandari, P., Desiana, P. M., Pinagara, F. A., & Novita, M. (2020). Financing needs of micro-enterprises along their evolution. International Journal of Ethics and Systems, 36(2), 263–284. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-05-2018-0071
  24. Reboul, E., Guérin, I., & Nordman, C. J. (2021). The gender of debt and credit: Insights from rural Tamil Nadu. World Development, 142, 105363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105363
  25. Rink, U., Walle, Y. M., & Klasen, S. (2021). The financial literacy gender gap and the role of culture. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 80, 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2021.02.006
  26. Rohman, P. S., Fianto, B. A., Ali Shah, S. A., Kayani, U. N., Suprayogi, N., & Supriani, I. (2021). A review on literature of Islamic microfinance from 2010-2020: Lesson for practitioners and future directions. Heliyon, 7(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08549
  27. Shihadeh, F. H. (2018). How individual’s characteristics influence financial inclusion: Evidence from MENAP. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(4), 553–574. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2017-0153
  28. Sibarani, B. (2002). Rentenir. Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, 411–423. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318652244_RENTENIR
  29. Silong, A. K. F., & Gadanakis, Y. (2020). Credit sources, access and factors influencing credit demand among rural livestock farmers in Nigeria. Agricultural Finance Review, 80(1), 68–90. https://doi.org/10.1108/AFR-10-2018-0090
  30. Tulus, R., & Nerang, M. (2020). Chapter 25 - Existential challenges of cooperatives and credit unions in Indonesia: Credit union trajectory in trying times, and the successful case of Keling Kumang credit union. Academic Press, 271–282. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-816666-6.00025-2
  31. Úbeda, F., Javier Forcadell, F., & Suárez, N. (2022). Do formal and informal institutions shape the influence of sustainable banking on financial development? Finance Research Letters, 46(May 2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102391
  32. Wasiaturrahma, Ajija, S. R., Sukmana, R., Sari, T. N., & Hudaifah, A. (2020). Breadth and depth outreach of Islamic cooperatives: Do size, non-performing finance, and grant matter? Heliyon, 6(7), e04472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04472
  33. Wicaksono, E. D. (2015). Pengaruh financial literacy terhadap perilaku pembayaran kartu kredit pada karyawan di Surabaya. Finesta, 3(1), 85–90. https://publication.petra.ac.id/index.php/manajemen-keuangan/article/view/2971/0
  34. Zahera, S. A., & Bansal, R. (2018). Do investors exhibit behavioral biases in investment decision making? A systematic review. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 10(2), 210–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-04-2017-0028