Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 321 Download : 381

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This paper discusses the diversity of boards and the performance of Islamic banks in three different conditions. Specifically, I will prove whether the diversity of the board is important for the performance of Islamic banks in normal conditions, turbulence, and recovery.


Methodology – The data includes all Islamic and conventional commercial banks in Indonesia during 2018-2022. The research period is divided into normal, turbulent, and recovery conditions. The data were analyzed with a panel regression model.


Findings – The results show that the level of board diversity in Islamic banks is lower than that of their conventional counterparts. In general, the level of board diversity is very important to encourage better bank performance. The effect of board diversity on performance is only significant in recovery conditions, but in times of turbulence, it is the opposite. In addition, I also find that diversity is most important for the BoD, while for the BoC it is the opposite.


Novelty – This study is different from previous research. This study examines the factors of board diversity as a whole and focuses on board diversity as a whole. Therefore, this research will better reflect the actual conditions.


Originality – This is the first paper to study the relationship between board diversity and bank performance in three conditions. It is also the first to compare the effects of diversity on Islamic banks with their conventional counterparts.

Keywords

Islamic banking board diversity bank performance

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Taufiqurrahman

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Taufiqurrahman, T. (2023). Does board diversity in Islamic banks matter?. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 9(2), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.20885/JEKI.vol9.iss2.art5
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Abdelfattah, T., Elmahgoub, M., & Elamer, A. A. (2020). Female audit partners and extended audit reporting: UK evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 1– 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04607-0
  2. Abou-El-Sood, H. (2019). Corporate governance and risk taking: the role of board gender diversity. Pacific Accounting Review, 31(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-03-2017-0021
  3. Adams, R.B., & Ferreira, D. (2007), A theory of friendly boards. Journal of Finance, 2(1), 217-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2007.01206.x.
  4. Adeabah, D., Gyeke-Dako, A., & Andoh, C. (2019). Board gender diversity, corporate governance and bank efficiency in Ghana: A two stage data envelope analysis (DEA) approach. Corporate Governance (Bingley), 19(2), 299– 320. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2017-0171.
  5. Adesanmi, A. D., Sanyaolu, O. A., Isiaka, M. A., & Fadipe, O. A. (2019). Empirical analysis of board diversity and the financial performance deposit money banks in Nigeria. Accounting, 5(4), 127– 134. http://dx.doi.org/10.5267/j.ac.2019.5.001.
  6. Aggarwal, R., Jindal, V., & Seth, R. (2019). Board diversity and firm performance: The role of business group affiliation. International Business Review, 28(6), 1– 7, 101600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101600.
  7. Agyemang-Mintah, P. and Schadewitz, H. (2019). Gender diversity and firm value: Evidence from UK financial institutions. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 27(1), 2-26. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-06-2017-0073.
  8. Ahern K.R., & Dittmar, A.K. (2012). The changing of the boards: The impact on firm valuation of mandated female board representation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1-60. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr049.
  9. Ahmad, M. A., & Alshbie, S. O. (2016). Women in Jordanian banks and performance: Financial accounting measurement. Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions, 6(3), 85– 159. https://doi.org/10.22495/rcgv6i3c1art1
  10. Ali, M., & Azmi, W. (2016). Religion in the boardroom and its impact on Islamic banks’ performance. Review of Financial Economics, 31(November 2016), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rfe.2016.08.001.
  11. Ali, M., Ng, Y.L., & Kulik, C.T. (2013). Board age and gender diversity: A test of competing linear and curvilinear predictions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(3), 1-16. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/63826/.
  12. Alnabsha, A., Abdou, H.A., Ntim, C.G. and Elamer, A.A. (2018). Corporate boards, ownership structures and corporate disclosures: Evidence from a developing country. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 19(1), 20-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-01-2016-0001.
  13. Alshbili, I., Elamer, A.A. and Beddewela, E. (2018). Ownership types, corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Empirical evidence from a developing country, Accounting Research Journal, 33(1), 148-166. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-03-2018-0060.
  14. Ararat, M., Aksu, M., & Cetin, A. (2015). How board diversity affects firm performance in emerging markets: Evidence on channels in controlled firms. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23 (2), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12103.
  15. Arnaboldi, F., Casu, B., Gallo, A., Kalotychou, E., & Sarkisyan, A. (2021). Gender diversity and bank misconduct. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1011834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101834.
  16. Baker, S.R., Bloom, N., Davis, S.J., Kost, K., Sammon, M., & Viratyosin, T. (2020). The unprecedented stock market reaction to Covid-19. The Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 10(4), 742–758, https://doi.org/10.1093/rapstu/raaa008.
  17. Bantel, K.A., & Jackson, S.E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10(Issue S1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709.
  18. Bantel, K. A. (1993). Strategic clarity in banking: Role of top management team demography. Psychological Reports, 73, 1187-1201. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1993.73.3f.1187.
  19. Bell, S.T., Villado, A.J., Lukasik, M.A., Belau, L. & Briggs, A.L. (2011). Getting specific about demographic diversity variable and team performance relationships: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 37(3), 709-743. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310365001.
  20. Ben-Amar, W., Francoeur, C., Hafsi, T., & Labelle, R. (2011). What makes better boards? A closer look at diversity and ownership. British Journal of Management, 24,(1), 85-101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00789.x.
  21. Bantel, K. A., & Jackson, S. E. (1989). Top management and innovation in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100709.
  22. Bilimoria, D. & Piderit, S. (1994). Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1453-1477. https://doi.org/10.5465/256795.
  23. Birindelli, G., Dell’Atti, S., Iannuzzi, A.P., & Savioli, M. (2018). Composition and activity of the board of directors: Impact on ESG performance in the banking system. Sustainability, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124699.
  24. Boadi, I. and Osarfo, D. (2019). Diversity and return: The impact of diversity of board members’ education on performance. Corporate Governance, 19(4), 824-842. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-01-2019-0017.
  25. Bøhren, Ø. & Strøm, R.Ø. (2010). Governance and politics: Regulating independence and diversity in the board room. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 37(9-10), 1281-1308. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02222.x.
  26. Bonn, I., Yoshikawa, T. & Phan, P.H. (2004). Effects of board structure on firm performance: A comparison between Japan and Australia. Asian Business & Management, 3(1), 105-125. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.abm.9200068.
  27. Brown, A., Anderson, A., Salas, J.M. & Ward, A. (2017). Do investors care about director tenure? Insights from executive cognition and social capital theories. Organization Science, 28(3), 471-494, available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1123
  28. Ciocirlan, C., & Petterson, C. (2011). Does workforce diversity matter in the fight against climate change? An analysis of fortune 500 companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.279.
  29. De Cabo, M.R., Gimeno, R. & Nieto, M.J. Gender diversity on European banks’ boards of directors. J Bus Ethics 109, 145–162 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1112-6.
  30. Dezsö, C.L. & Ross, D.G. (2012). Does female representation in top management improve firm performance? A panel data investigation. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1072-1089. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1955.
  31. Dinu, V., & Bunea, M. (2017). The impact of the gender diversity on the Romanian banking system performance. Transformations in Business and Economics, 17(2), 137– 147. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mariana-Bunea/publication/331206932_TIBE_2018The_impact_of_gender_diversity/links/60939206299bf1ad8d7da15d/TIBE-2018The-impact-of-gender-diversity.
  32. Elgadi, E., & Ghardallou, W. (2022). Gender diversity, board of director’s size and Islamic banks performance. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 15(3), 664-680. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-09-2019-0397.
  33. Elmagrhi, M.H., Ntim, C.G., Malagila, J., Fosu, S. and Tunyi, A.A. (2018), Trustee board diversity, governance mechanisms, capital structure and performance in UK charities. Corporate Governance, 18(3), 478-508. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-08-2017-0185.
  34. Farag, H., & Mallin, C., & Ow-Young, K. (2018). Corporate governance in Islamic banks: New insights for dual board structure and agency relationships. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54(May 2018), 59-77, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.002.
  35. Fernandes, C., Farinha, J., Martins, F. V., & Mateus, C. (2016). Determinants of European banks' bailouts following the 2007–2008 financial crisis. Journal of International Economic Law, 19(3), 707– 747. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgw060.
  36. Fernandes, C., Farinha, J., Martins, F. V., & Mateus, C. (2017). Supervisory boards, financial crisis and bank performance: Do board characteristics matter? Journal of Banking Regulation, 18(4), 310– 337. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-016-0037-5.
  37. Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Fernández-Izquierdo, M.A., & Muñoz-Torres, M.J. (2015). Integrating sustainability into corporate governance: An empirical study on board diversity. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(4), 193-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1333.
  38. Gangi, F., Meles, A., D'Angelo, E., & Daniele, L. M. (2019). Sustainable development and corporate governance in the financial system: Are environmentally friendly banks less risky? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(3), 529– 547. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1699.
  39. García-Meca, E., García-Sánchez, I-M., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2015). Board diversity and its effects on bank performance: An international analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 53(April 2015), 202-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.002.
  40. Glass, C., & Cook, A. (2016). Leading at the top: Understanding women's challenges above the glass ceiling. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 51-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.003.
  41. Gul, F.A., Srinidhi, B. & Ng, A.C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.01.005.
  42. Hafsi, T. and Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112(3), 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1272-z.
  43. Hambrick, D., & Mason, P.A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628.
  44. Hart, O. (1995). Corporate governance. The Economic Journal, 105(430), 678-689. https://doi.org/10.2307/2235027.
  45. Hassan, A., Elamer, A. A., Sobhan, N., & Fletcher, M. (2020). Voluntary assurance of sustainability reporting: Evidence from an emerging economy. Accounting Research Journal, 33(2), 391– 410. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARJ-10-2018-0169.
  46. Hillman, A.J., Shropshire, C. & Cannella, A.A. (2007). Organizational predictors of women on corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941-952. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279222.
  47. Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N. R. F. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044025.
  48. Ingley, C. B., Van der Walt, N. T. 2003. Board configuration: building better boards. Corporate governance, 3(4), 5-17. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700310497078.
  49. Ismail, K.N.I. and Abdul Manaf, K.B. (2016). Market reactions to the appointment of women to the boards of Malaysian firms. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 36, 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2016.04.004.
  50. Jabari, H.N., & Muhamad, R. (2021). Gender diversity and financial performance of Islamic banks. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 19(3), 412-433. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-03-2020-0061.
  51. Kanter, R.M. (1999). From spare change to real change: The social sector as beta site for business innovation. Harvard Business Review, 77(3), 122. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA54556303&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00178012&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=anon%7Ef728e848&aty=open+web+entry.
  52. Kaymak, T., & Bektas, E. (2008). East meets west? Board characteristics in an emerging market: Evidence from Turkish banks. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(6), 550– 561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00713.x.
  53. Khan, I., Khan, U.I., Uddin, M.J., Khan, S.U., & Marwat, J. (2023). Diversity of shari’ah supervisory board and the performance of Islamic bank: Evidence from a emerging economy of Pakistan. Journal of Islamic Accounting & Business Research, 22 March 2023. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-09-2021-0240.
  54. Kim, H. and Lim, C. (2010). Diversity, outside directors and firm valuation: Korean evidence. Journal of Business Research, 63(3), 284-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.01.013.
  55. Kramaric, T.P., Miletic, M., & Pavic, I. (2017). Profitability determinants of insurance markets in selected central and eastern European countries. International Journal of Economic Science, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.20472/ES.2017.6.2.006.
  56. Kray, L.J., Kennedy, J.A. & Van Zant, A.B. (2014). Not competent enough to know the difference? Gender stereotypes about women’s ease of being misled predict negotiator deception. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125(2), 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.06.002.
  57. Levi, M., Li, K. & Zhang, F. (2014). Director gender and mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 185-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.005.
  58. Lu, J., & Boateng, A. (2018). Board composition, monitoring and credit risk: Evidence from the UK banking industry. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 51(4), 1107-1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0698-x.
  59. Lückerath-Rovers, M. (2013). Women on boards and firm performance. Journal of Management and Governance, 17(2), 491-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-011-9186-1.
  60. Mahadeo, J.D., Soobaroyen, T. & Hanuman, V.O. (2012). Board composition and financial performance: uncovering the effects of diversity in an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(3), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0973-z.
  61. Michel, J.G. & Hambrick, D.C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), pp. 9-37. https://doi.org/10.5465/256471.
  62. Mohammad, S. J., Abdullatif, M., & Zakzouk, F. (2018). The effect of gender diversity on the financial performance of Jordanian banks. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 22(2), 1– 11. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/
  63. Murray, A.I. (1989). Top management group heterogeneity and firm performance. StrategicManagement Journal, 10(S1), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250100710.
  64. Onuorah, A. C., Osuji, C. C., & Ozurumba, B. A. (2019). Board composition, diversity index and performance: Evidence from four major nigerian banks. Journal of Management Information and Decision Science, 22(4), 342– 359. https://www.proquest.com/indexingvolumeissuelinkhandler/38743/ .
  65. Ozatac, N. (2011). Gender diversity in board of directors and top management: The case of Turkish banks. Actual Problems of Economics, 115(1), 311– 319. http://buscompress.com/journal-home.html)
  66. Pathan, S., & Faff, R. (2013). Does board structure in banks really affect their performance? Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(5), 1573-1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2012.12.016.
  67. Pelled, L.H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science, 7(6), 615-631. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2635051.
  68. Pelz, D.C. (1956). Some Social Factors Related to Performance in a Research Organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1(3), 310-325. https://doi.org/10.2307/2390926.
  69. Platt, H. and Platt, M. (2012). Corporate board attributes and bankruptcy. Journal of Business Research, 65(8), 1139-1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.08.003.
  70. Rafinda, A., Rafinda, A., Witiastuti, R. S., Suroso, A., & Trinugroho, I. (2018). Board diversity, risk and sustainability of bank performance: Evidence from India. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 793– 806. https://doi.org/10.9770/jssi.2018.7.4(15).
  71. Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance, 15(2), 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00570.x.
  72. Salancik, G.R., & Pfeffer, J. (19878). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224-253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563.
  73. Shettima, U., & Dzolkarnaini, N. (2018). Board characteristics and microfinance institutions' performance: Panel data evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 8(3), 369– 386. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAEE-01-2017-0006.
  74. Sitthipongpanich, T., &Polsiri, P. (2014). Board diversity, network, and firm value. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 1(1). https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/189827.
  75. Sturman, M.C. (2003). Searching for the inverted U-shaped relationship between time and performance: meta-analyses of the experience/performance, tenure/performance, and age/ performance relationships. Journal of Management, 29(5), 609-640. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-2063_03_00028-X.
  76. Sun, J., & Liu, G. (2014). Audit committees' oversight of bank risk-taking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 40(1), 376– 387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.12.015.
  77. Talavera, O., Yin, S., & Zhang, M. (2018). Age diversity, directors' personal values, and bank performance. International Review of Financial Analysis, 55, 60– 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2017.10.007.
  78. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320– 337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2009.00742.x.
  79. Wang, T., & Hsu, C. (2013). Board composition and operational risk events of financial institutions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37(6), 2042– 2051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.01.027.
  80. Wiersema, M.F., & Bantel, K.A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 91-121. https://doi.org/10.5465/256474.
  81. Yu, B., College, M., Lenard, M. J., College, M., York, E. A., & College, M. (2017). Female leadership in banking and bank risk. Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 21(3), 1– 19. https://www.proquest.com/openview/6c4ce7a637e31c3fa697a5e148e343d0/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=29414.