Article Sidebar

Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study develops a Sharia-compliant crowdfunding model based on digital technology that integrates four principal contracts in Islamic jurisprudence (salam, istisna’, muzara’ah, and musaqah) to enhance the relevance and effectiveness of agricultural financing in Indonesia.
Methodology – Using a qualitative exploratory approach, we combine relevant literature and content analyses of agricultural crowdfunding campaigns. The model’s internal validity is reinforced through triangulation involving Islamic legal theory, and nationally recognized Sharia regulatory guidelines issued by the Indonesian National Sharia Council (DSN-MUI). Empirical campaign data. were obtained from 15 agricultural crowdfunding campaigns published during 2021-2024 period and validated through thematic analysis and triangulation across documents and campaign reports.
Findings – The findings reveal that most existing campaigns rely on single contracts, such as salam or murabahah, which are inadequate for the seasonal and high-risk nature of agriculture. The proposed multi-contract model offers a more equitable and Sharia-aligned financing framework that accommodates joint risk sharing and production-based returns. Furthermore, digital integration allows for the development of more inclusive, adaptive, and dynamic contracts.
Implications – Theoretically, this study contributes to the Islamic finance literature by introducing a risk-sharing, partnership-oriented financing framework tailored to the agricultural sector. Practically, the model provides actionable insights for Sharia-compliant crowdfunding platforms and financial regulators to promote inclusive and sustainable agricultural finance.
Originality – This study contributes to the literature by proposing a conceptual model of multi-contract agricultural crowdfunding, a novel approach that bridges normative Sharia principles with empirical evidence in the context of Islamic digital financial innovation.

Keywords

Sharia crowdfunding Agriculture finance Multi contract Financial Inclusion Islamic Fintech

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Rizal Fahlevi, Muhammad Nadratuzzaman Hosen, Euis Amalia

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Fahlevi, R., Hosen, M. N., & Amalia, E. (2026). Contractual-based Islamic crowdfunding model for sustainable agricultural financing. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 12(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.20885/JEKI.vol12.iss1.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aryanti, Y. (2016). Multi akad (Al-uqud al-Murakkabah). JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah, Jurusan Syariah STAIN), 15(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v15i2.498
  2. Asian Development Bank. (2022). Financial inclusion in agriculture in ASEAN: Policies and practices. https://www.adb.org/publications
  3. Azman, N. H. N., Md Zabri, M. Z., Masron, T. A., & Malim, N. A. K. (2020). The utilisation of Islamic fintech (i Fintech) in promoting sustainable inclusive growth: Evidence from micro entrepreneurs in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 6(3), 555–576. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v6i3.1180
  4. Bank Negara Malaysia. (2020). Value-based Intermediation financing and investment impact assessment framework (VBIAF). https://www.bnm.gov.my/documents/20124/938039/VBIAF.pdf
  5. Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Produk domestik bruto Indonesia tahun 2023 menurut lapangan usaha. https://www.bps.go.id
  6. Braun, V., Clarke, V., Terry, G., & Hayfield, N. (2019). Thematic analysis. In P. Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 843–860). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103
  7. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
  8. Daud, H. S., & Sharif, S. (2024). Exploring the feasibility of muzara’ah based Islamic running finance model as an alternative for agriculture credit. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-12-2022-0352
  9. DinarStandard. (2023). The lobal Islamic fintech report 2023/24 (Executive summary). https://salaamgateway.s3.us-east-2.amazonaws.com/special-coverage/Islamic-fintech2023/PDF/Global%20Islamic%20Fintech%20Report%202023-24%20-%20Executive%20Summary.pdf
  10. Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Why do Malaysian customers patronise Islamic banks? International Journal of Bank Marketing, 25(3), 142–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/02652320710739850
  11. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
  12. Fathoni, M. A., & Suryani. (2024). Profit loss sharing (PLS) and its implementation in Indonesian Islamic banking. IQTISHODUNA: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.36835/iqtishoduna.v9i1.478
  13. Ghozali, M., & Kurniawan, A. (2017). Profit and loss sharing (PLS) as basis characteristic of Islamic banking: An analysis of mudharâbah contract. AL IKTISAB: Journal of Islamic Economic Law, 1(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.21111/al-iktisab.v1i1.2383
  14. Hasanudin, H., Dewi, N. M., Pertiwi, G. P., & Wijayanti, F. (2022). Hybrid contract in Islamic financial services. Al Iqtishād: Journal of Islamic Economics, 14(1), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.15408/aiq.v14i1.25692
  15. Hasan, R., Hassan, M. K., & Rashid, M. (2021). Qard hasan (interest-free loan) as a tool for sustainable development: Global evidence. Islamic finance and sustainable development (pp. 307–330). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76016-8_13
  16. Hendratmi, A., Ryandono, M. N. H., & Sukmaningrum, P. S. (2020). Developing Islamic crowdfunding website platform for startup companies in Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(5), 1041–1053. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2019-0022
  17. Iqbal, Z., & Mirakhor, A. (2017). Sacralizing finance: Risk-sharing Islamic finance. Ethical Dimensions of Islamic Finance (pp. 109–131). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66390-6_6
  18. Ishak, M. S. I., Kamaruddin, M. H., & Aderemi, A. M. R. (2022). Mudharabah based crowdfunding as an alternative source of funding book publications in Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 13(9), 1973–1987. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2020-0147
  19. Ishak, M. S. I., & Rahman, M. H. (2021). Equity based Islamic crowdfunding in Malaysia: A potential application for mudarabah. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 13(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRFM-03-2020-0024
  20. Maharani, R. D., Halimah, R. N., Anani, S. M., & Lutfi, S. N. A. (2023). Pengembangan model crowdfunding syariah untuk pembiayaan UMKM (studi pada platform fintech Ethis). Social Science Academic, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.37680/ssa.v1i2.4280
  21. Makki, M., & Suwardi. (2024). Platform crowdfunding syariah: Paradigma baru dalam pembiayaan untuk startup dan usaha kecil di era digital. Journal of Economic & Business Law Review, 4(2), 133–155. https://doi.org/10.19184/jeblr.v4i2.53057
  22. Manggala Putri, S. A., Rahayu Firmansyah, E. J., & Hayati, S. R. (2023). Islamic microcredit-based financing analysis: A study of Islamic banking in the Special Region of Yogyakarta. AL-FALAH: Journal of Islamic Economics, 8(1), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.29240/alfalah.v8i1.6842
  23. Mohd Nor, S. M., & Hashim, N. A. (2020). Trust motivates funders to participate in Shari’ah crowdfunding. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 16(2), 228–238. https://doi.org/10.17576/geo-2020-1602-18
  24. Mohd Thas Thaker, H., Khaliq, A., Sakaran, K. C., & Mohd Thas Thaker, M. A. (2020). A discourse on the potential of crowdfunding and Islamic finance in the agricultural sector of East Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 6(1), 10–23. https://doi.org/10.20885/JEKI.vol6.iss1.art2
  25. Muneeza, A., & Mustapha, Z. (2021). Islamic fintech and financial inclusion. In A. Muneeza & Z. Mustapha (Eds.), Islamic FinTech: Insights and solutions (pp. 173–190). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45827-0_10
  26. Nasucha, M. N., Ahmed, R., & Barre, G. M. (2019). Examining the viability of istisna for project financing: An economic perspective. International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 6(4), 330–342. https://doi.org/10.18646/2056.64.19-019
  27. Nugroho, A. Y., & Rachmaniyah, F. (2022). Fenomena perkembangan crowdfunding di Indonesia. Ekonika: Jurnal Ekonomi Universitas Kadiri, 4(1), Article 254. https://doi.org/10.30737/ekonika.v4i1.254
  28. Nurhidayah, N., & Bastomi, M. (2025). How Islamic securities crowdfunding platforms attract prospective investors to SMEs: Insights from Indonesia. Iqtishadia: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, 17(1), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v17i1.29828
  29. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. (2023). Statistik Fintech Syariah Indonesia. https://www.ojk.go.id/id/statistik
  30. Prasetya, A., & Santoso, H. (2023). Capital structure affect asset structure, income volatility, and financial flexibility in islamic industrial sector companies. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 9(3), 3243–3249. https://doi.org/10.29040/jiei.v9i3.10896
  31. Purwatiningsih, A., Purnamasari, S., & Setyawati, H. (2024). Bibliometric analysis of Islamic crowdfunding: A literature review of its journey. F1000Research, 13, 531. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.146797.2
  32. Roos Nelly, Harianto, Abd. Majid, M. S., Marliyah, & Handayani, R. (2022). Studi empiris perkembangan crowdfunding syariah di Indonesia. Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah, 4(5), 1283–1297. 10.3194/jse.v1i1.6877
  33. Rufaida, E. R. (2024). Profit and loss sharing: Konsep dalam perspektif Islam dan teori perbankan Syariah. Abdurrauf Social Science, 1(2), 126–144. https://doi.org/10.70742/arsos.v1i2.36
  34. Syahputra, A., Harahap, I., Nawawi, Z. M., & Kaswinata. (2023). Distribusi pendapatan dan kemiskinan di Indonesia dalam perspektif ekonomi Islam: Tantangan dan prospek masa depan. Iqtisaduna: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 9(2), 144–161. https://doi.org/10.24252/iqtisaduna.v9i2.41929
  35. Susanto, D., Sabbar, S. D., & Luthfi, M. (2025). Relevansi dan implementasi fiqh muamalah dalam transaksi ekonomi modern. Jurnal Studi Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam (SEBI), 7(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.37567/sebi.v7i1
  36. Thaker, M. A. M. T., Thas Thaker, H. M., & Pitchay, A. A. (2018). Modeling crowdfunders’ behavioral intention to adopt the crowdfunding–waqf model (CWM) in Malaysia: The theory of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 11(3), 308–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-06-2017-0157
  37. WorldBank. (2023). Unlocking agricultural finance for smallholders in Indonesia. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/indonesia/publication/agriculture-finance-2023
  38. Zainollah, M., & Ghufron, M. I. (2022). Konsep dan implementasi asas keadilan dalam akad muzara'ah pada sektor pertanian. Jurnal Akuntansi, Keuangan dan Kebijakan Publik (JAKK), 8(1), 1–13. http://jurnal.umsu.ac.id/index.php/JAKK/index