Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 725 Download : 1267

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study offers an alternative governance (arrangement) mudharaba contract resulting mudharaba institutions that benefit both parties (principal and agent). With interviews obtained two important findings: first, the character of prospective clients is an important determinant of the creation of a contract as collateral material (should) not be used as a tool to compensate for the risk, and the second is that monitoring is key to the process of contract enforcement. Based on existing findings, to develop an institutional design that is expected mudharaba fair and beneficial to both parties, the bank / Shohibul mall as the principal and client / mudarib as an agent.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Author

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Manzilati, A. (2011). TATA KELOLA INSTITUSI (INSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENT) KONTRAK MUDHARABA DALAM KERANGKA TEORI KEAGENAN. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 1(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol1.iss1.art6
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Agustianto. (2009). Evaluasi Bank Syariah 2008 dan Outlook 2009 (bagian 1).www. Pesantren Virtual.com diakses pada tanggal 28 juli 2009.
  2. Agus. (2007). “Mudharabah dan Musyarakah Core Business Bank Syariahâ€. www.pkes.org/?page=info_list&id=51&PHPSESSID
  3. Algoud, Latifa M and Mervyn K. Lewis. (2003). Perbankan Syariah; Prinsip Praktik Prospek, terjemahan, PT serambi Ilmu Semesta.
  4. Anonymous. (2001). Info Bank no. 288/November 2001/vol XXIII
  5. Anonymous. (2009). “Sekilas Perbankan Syariah di Indonesiaâ€. Diakses pada www.bi.go.id/web/id/Perbankan/Perbankan+Syariah
  6. Bashir, Abdel Hameed M. (2000). “Limited Liability, Moral Hazard and Financial Constraints in Profit-Sharing Contractâ€. Prepared for the Fourth International Conference on Islamic Economic and Banking, August 13-15, 2000, Loughborough University, U. K.
  7. Bech, Mickael. (2008). “Sales Managementâ€. www.sam.sdu.dk diakses tanggal 14 Februari 2008 jam 09.15. Hal 1
  8. Beckert, Jens. (2003). “Economic Sociology and Embeddedness: How Shall We Conceptualize Economic Action?â€. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 37, 2003. Hal 1
  9. Beckert, Jens. (2007). “The Social Order of Marketsâ€. MPIfG Discussion Paper 07 / 15 Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne. December 2007. Hal 5
  10. Blumer, Herbert. (1969). Symbolic Interactionism. Perspective and Method. Prentice-Hall Inc. USA.
  11. Chapra. M. Umer. (2001). Masa Depan Ilmu Ekonomi, Sebuah Tinjauan Islam. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press.
  12. Charon, Joel M. (1979). Symbolic Interactionism: An Introduction, an Intepretation, an Integration. Upper Sadde River, NJ: Prentice – Hall. Hal 23
  13. Chajewski, Leszek. (2008). “Theory in Economic Sociology. Institute for Political Studies, the Polish Academy of Sciencesâ€. http://www.collegium.edu.pl/chajewski/Chajewski2005a.pdf diakses pada tanggal 14 Februari 2008 pukul 12.02 wib. Hal 2
  14. Dugger, William M. (1988). “A Research Agenda for Institutional Economicsâ€. Journal of Economics Isssues. Vol. XXII No. 4 Dec 1988. Hal 983
  15. Elster, Jon. (1989). “Social Norms and Economic Theoryâ€. Journal of Economic Perspective. No. 3. Hal 99
  16. Fukuyama. Francis. (2002).â€The Great Disruptionâ€. Hakikat Manusia dan Rekonstitusi Tatanan Sosial. Yogyakarta: CV. Qalam. Hal 278
  17. Harvey, John T and Michael A. Katovick. (1992).†Symbolic Interactionism and Institutionalism: Common Rootsâ€, Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. XXVI No. 3 September 1992. Hal 800
  18. Holmstrom. (1982). Holmstrom (1982:324, http://jleo.oxfordjournals.org)
  19. Idat, D.G. (2001). Memberdayakan Sistem Bagi Hasi Bank Syariah Menjadi Win-Win Solution And Happy Bisnis. Pengembangan Perbankan September-Oktober No.91 2001.
  20. Jensen, Michael C and William H. Meckling. (1976). “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structureâ€. Journal of Financial Economics. Oktober, 1976, Volume 3. No. 4. Hal 308
  21. Khalil, Abdel Fattah, Colin Rickwood and Victor Murinde. (2000). “.Agency Contractual Problems in Profit-Sharing (Mudarabah) Financing Practices by Interest-Free Banksâ€. Prepared for the Fourth International Conference on Islamic Economic and Banking, Loughborough University, U.K.
  22. Karim, A.A.(2001). Ekonomi Islam Suatu Kajian Kontemporer. Gema Isani Press.Jakarta
  23. Kherallah, Mylene and Johann Kirsten. (2001). The New Institutional Economics: Aplications for Agricultural Policy Research in Developing Countries. MSSD Discussion Paper No. 41.
  24. Lin, Justin Y.(1999). An Economic Theory of Institutional Change. in Colin Barlow. Institutions and Economic Change in Southeas Asia. Edward Ellgar. Cheltenham, UK. Northampton, MA.USA. Hal 6
  25. Mannan, Muhammad Abdul. (1993). Teori dan Praktek Ekonomi Islam. Yogyakarta: PT. Dana Bhakti Wakaf.
  26. Mantzavinos, Chrysostomos. (2001). Individuals, Institutions, and Markets. Cambridge University Press. Hal 54
  27. Miller, Nolan. (2005). Notes on the Principle-Agent Problem. http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~aeggers/patheory.pdf. diakses pada 19 Februari 2008, pukul 9.31 wib. Hal 1
  28. Nicholson, Walter. (1990). Intermediate Microeconomics, The Dryden Press. Hal 430
  29. Peukert, Helge. (2001). “Bridging Old and New Institutional Economics: Gustav Schmoller and Douglass C. North. Seen with Oldinstitutionalists’ Eyesâ€. European Journal of Law and Economics. March 2001. Hal 92, 93
  30. Staveren, van Irene. (1999). “Chaos Theory and Institutional Economic: Metaphor or Model?â€. Journal of Economic Issues. Vol. XXXIII No. 1 March 1999. Hal 142
  31. Siamat, Dahlan. (1993). Manajemen Bank Umum. Intermedia. Jakarta. Hal 212
  32. Sumitro, Warkum. (2002). Asas Asas Perbankan Islam dan Lembaga Lembaga Terkait; BMI dan Takaful di Indonesia. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.Hal 151
  33. Ulin, Priscilla R, Elizabeth T. Robinson, Elizabeth E. Tolley, Erin T. McNeill. (2002). Qualitative Methods; Applied Reseach in Sexual and Reproductive Health. Family Health International. North Carolina. USA. Hal V
  34. Varian, Hal R. (1993). Intermediate Microeconomics; A Modern Approach, W.W. New York. London: Norton Company. Hal 606
  35. Vogel, Frank E and Samuel L Hayes. (1998). Islamic Law and Finance. London : Kluwer Law International.
  36. Williamson, Oliver E. (2000). “The New Institutional Economics; Taking Stock, Looking Aheadâ€. Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 38, September 2000. Hal 597