Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 518 Download : 2321

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Theoritically, a company based on the principles of Islamic law (profit and loss sharing/PLS) is believed to be able to minimize agency problems and agency cost than the conventional companies,either in the aspect of the business philosophy, contract design, and control. However, the implementation of PLS is still facing a lot of obstacles, Hence, it is not surprising that models of PLS is not predominantly used by Islamic financial institutions, both in Indonesia and abroad. The cclassic argument on  why the model is not dominant because it is considered more risky. In order to contribute to the agency problems in the Islamic perspective, this paper, firstly, will explain and explore the arguments which show advantages of Islamic concept on company in reducing agency problems and agency cost. Secondly, this paper will reveal the obstacles and problems faced in the implementation of such concept. Thirdly, this paper will offer an alternative solution framework to address various issues and constraints faced by them. Solutions offered here includes understanding aspects of the Islamic business draft, micro and macro benefits, human resources, regulatory and performance measurement indicators of  Islamic financial institutions.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Khoiruddin, M., & Noekent, V. (2017). MEMINIMUMKAN AGENCY PROBLEM DAN AGENCY COST DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN KONSEP ISLAM TENTANG PERUSAHAAN: ANTARA TEORI DAN PRAKTIK. Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 1(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol1.iss2.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Aggarwal, R and Yousef, T (2002), "Islamic Banks and Investment Financing," Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 32, No. 1, February.
  2. Brigham, E.F and Louis C. Gapenski, L. (1997), Financial Management: Theory and Practice, Eight Edition, The Dryden Press Harcourt Brace College Publishers.
  3. Canyan, M and Leach, D. (1994), “Top Pay, Company Performance and Corporate Governanceâ€, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
  4. Chapra,U.C (1985) Towards A Just Monetary System, The Islamic Foundation, Leicester.
  5. Dar, H. A. Dar and Presley, J.R (2000), “Lack Of Profit-Loss Sharing in Islamic Banking: Management and Control Imbalancesâ€, International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, Vol. 2, No. 2.
  6. Eugene F. Fama, E.F and Jensen M.C. (1983), “Separation of Ownership and Controlâ€, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. XXVI, June.
  7. Farooq, M.O (2006), Partnership, Equity-financing and Islamic finance:
  8. Whither Profit-Loss-Sharing?, online, August.
  9. Iqbal, M dan Molyneux, P. (2005) Thirty Years of Islamic Banking: History, Performance and Prospects, Palgrave.
  10. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia,(2007) PSAK No. 105 tentang Akuntansi Mudharabah (2007)
  11. ______, (2007) PSAK No. 106 tentang Akuntansi Musyarakah (2007)
  12. Jensen, M.C and Meckling, W. (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structureâ€, Journal of Financial Economics.
  13. Khan, T, (1996) An Analysis of Risk Sharing in Islamic Finance with Special Reference to Pakistan, online.
  14. Khoiruddin, M (2002), “Upaya Meminumkan Agency Problem dengan Menggunakan Konsep Islam tentang Perusahaanâ€, Kompetensi, FE UCY.
  15. Muhammad, (2009), Permasalahan Agency Dalam Pembiayaan Mudharabah Pada Bank Syariah Di Indonesia. Ekonomi Islam On Line, April.
  16. Ogden, S and Watson, R (1996), “The Relationship Between Changes in Incentive Structures, Executive Pay and Corporate Performance : Some Evidence from the Privatised Water Industry in England and Walesâ€, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting.
  17. Saeed, A. (1996) Islamic Banking and Interest: A Study of the Prohibition of Riba and its Contemporary Interpretation, New York: E. J. Brill.
  18. Sarker, A.A. (1999), “Islamic Business Contracts, Agency Problem and the Theory of the Islamic Firmâ€, International Journal of Islamic Financial Services, Vol. 1, No. 2, July-September.
  19. Usmani. M.T (2002), An Introduction to Islamic Finance, The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
  20. Vogel, F dan Hayes, S. (1998). Islamic Law and Finance: Religion, Risk and Return. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.