Article Sidebar

Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1052 Download : 1110

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

The alms organization (Lazis) is an organization which has duty to manage the donation of muslims, the biggest population of Indonesia. Therefore, implementation of accountability of such organization is necessary, considering the large amount of the potential donation that could be managed. The objective of this research is to understand the accountability practice of a well known alms organization named Yayasan Dana Sosial al Falah (YDSF) Malang branch. This is a descriptive-qualitative study. The findings of this research show that the accountability practice of YDSF Malang includes habluminallah and habluminannas dimensions. The substance of such accountability practice includes physical, mental and spiritual aspects as classify by Triyuwono and Roekhuddin (2000). Physically, the accountability practice is materialized in the responsibility report to the YDSF holding and to the benefactors. Mentally and spiritually, it is materialized into various programs both in economic and social, as well as employees’ ethic and the employees’ obedience to the Islamic law. Finally, this research proposes a variant of conventional agency theory which is stated as Islamic Agency Theory. 

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
How to Cite
Riyanti, Y. R., & Irianto, G. (2022). AKUNTABILITAS PADA LEMBAGA AMIL ZAKAT, INFAQ DAN SHADAQAH (STUDI KASUS PADA YAYASAN DANA SOSIAL AL-FALAH (YDSF) MALANG). Jurnal Ekonomi & Keuangan Islam, 1(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.20885/jeki.vol1.iss2.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

References

  1. Berg, B. L. (2004). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. 5th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
  2. Coy, D and Michael, P. (1998), “An Insight Into Accountability and Politics in Universities: A Case Studyâ€, Accounting, Auditing, Accountability Journal, Vol.11 No.4. Pg.540. Waikato Management School, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. MCB University Press.
  3. Dewi, Ni W, Y. (2008). Akuntabilitas Dalam Bingkai Filosofi Tri Hita Karana: Suatu Eksplorasi Pada Lembaga Perkreditan Desa (LPD) Desa Pakraman Dharmajati Tukadmungga, Kabupaten Malang, Propinsi Bali. Tesis (S2). Program Magister Akuntansi, Pascasarjana Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Brawijaya, Malang.
  4. Echols, J,M. dan Hassan, S. (1997). Kamus Inggris-Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  5. Farhan, D. (2003). “Akuntabilitas dan Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pusat dan Daerah Dalam Rangka Otonomi Daerahâ€. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Vol. 4 No.1.
  6. Gray et al. (1996). Accounting and Accountability: Changes and challenges in coporate sosial and environmental reporting. Europe: Prentice Hall.
  7. Ikatan Akuntan Indonesia. (2002). Standar Akuntansi Keuangan. Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
  8. Indriantoro, N dan Bambang S. (1999). Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis untuk Akuntansi dan Manajemen. Yogyakarta: BPFE.
  9. Mardiasmo. (2002). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi.
  10. Mulawarman, A. D. (2006). Menyibak Akuntansi Syariah: Rekonstruksi Teknologi Akuntansi Syariah dari Wacana ke Aksi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
  11. Nazir, M. (2003). Metode Penilitian. Jakarta: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.
  12. Santana K., S. (2007). Menulis Ilmiah: Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
  13. Triyuwono, I dan Roekhuddin. (2000). Konsistensi Praktik Sistem Pengendalian Intern dan Akuntabilitas Pada Lazis (Studi Kasus di Lazis X Jakarta). Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Indonesia Vol.3 No.2.
  14. Ulum, I. (2004). Akuntansi Sektor Publik: Sebuah Pengantar. Malang: UMM Press.