Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 22, 2021
Accepted
February 25, 2022
Published
April 26, 2022
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 902 Download : 2915

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose ― We examine whether the foreign direct investment (FDI) in promoting technical efficiency is controlled by the sector classifications based on the technology intensity (High Technology, Medium-High Technology, Medium-Low Technology, and Low Technology).


Methods ― We use the Indonesian firm-level dataset of the large and medium manufacturing survey from 2007 to 2015 and employ the time-varying stochastic production frontier.


Findings ― We reveal that FDI, technology intensity and absorptive Capacity significantly affect firms' production and efficiency. We also found that the Indonesian manufacturing industry from 2007 to 2015 experienced positive Total Factor Productivity growth, where High-Technology sectors experienced the largest magnitude among others. Meanwhile, technological progress stemming from FDI is enjoyed more by Low Technology sectors. Meaning to say, technology intensity classification does not matter to technological progress.


Implication ― The host country's government should focus on industries with high technical capabilities to accelerate FDI gains for the firms. Simultaneously, human capital improvement also needs to be intensified, for instance, through training or human development, so that firms with lower technical capability can catch up and, consequently, receive similar benefits from FDI activities.


Originality ― Our study accommodates the research gap by including the FDI effect in both productivity and efficiency in a single equation. Many studies merely categorize technology intensity following the stochastic production frontier estimation to obtain technical efficiency or TFP growth. In this sense, those studies did not control the impact of the technology-specific effect.

Keywords

FDI Manufacturing Indonesia Stochastic Production Frontier.

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Mohammad Zeqi Yasin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Economic Journal of Emerging Markets by Center for Economic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Yasin, M. Z., & Sari, D. W. (2022). Foreign direct investment, efficiency, and total factor productivity: Does technology intensity classification matter?. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss1.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Atkin, D., Khandelwal, A. K., & Osman, A. (2017). Exporting and firm performance: Evidence from a randomized experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 551–615. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx002.Advance
  2. Baltabaev, B. (2014). Foreign direct investment and total factor productivity growth: New macro-evidence. World Economy, 37(2), 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.12115
  3. Carbonell, J. B., & Werner, R. A. (2018). Does foreign direct investment generate economic growth? A new empirical approach applied to Spain. Economic Geography, 94(4), 425–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2017.1393312
  4. Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W., & Lau, L. J. (1973). Transcendental logarithmic production frontiers. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 55(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/1927992
  5. Coad, A. (2018). Firm age: A survey. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 13–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-016-0486-0
  6. De Loecker, J. (2013). Detecting learning by exporting. American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 5(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.5.3.1
  7. Djankov, S., & Hoekman, B. (2000). Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises. World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 49–64.
  8. Farrell, M. J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 120(3), 253–290. https://doi.org/2343100
  9. Fu, X., & Gong, Y. (2011). Indigenous and foreign innovation efforts and drivers of technological upgrading: Evidence from China. World Development, 39(7), 1213–1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.05.010
  10. Gopalan, S., Hattari, R., & Rajan, R. S. (2016). Understanding foreign direct investment in Indonesia. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy, 15(1), 28–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-01-2016-0003
  11. Haddad, M., & Harrison, A. (1993). Are there positive spillovers from direct foreign investment? Evidence from panel data from Morocco. Journal of Development Economics, 42(1), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(93)90072-U
  12. Henry, M., Kneller, R., & Milner, C. (2009). Trade, technology transfer and national efficiency in developing countries. European Economic Review, 53(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.05.001
  13. International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2004). Definition of foreign direct investment (FDI) terms, IMF committee on balance of payments statistics and OECD. In Workshop on International Investment Statistics, Direct Investment Technical Expert Group (DITEG), Issues Paper (DITEG) #20, Statistics Canada.
  14. Javorcik, B., Fitriani, F., Iacovone, L., Varela, G., & Duggan, V. (2012, September). Productivity performance in Indonesia’s manufacturing sector. Open Knowledge Repository World Bank Group. World Bank Group. https://doi.org/10.1596/26715
  15. Keller, W. (2010). International trade, foreign direct investment, and technology spillovers. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation (Vol. 2). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7218(10)02003-4
  16. Kokko, A. (1994). Technology, market characteristics, and spillovers. Journal of Development Economics, 43(2), 279–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(94)90008-6
  17. Kokko, Ari, & Kravtsova, V. (2008). Innovative capability in MNC subsidiaries: Evidence from four European transition economies. Post-Communist Economies, 20(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631370701865722
  18. Kumar, S., & Russell, R. R. (2002). Technological change and catch-up and capital deepening: Relative contributions to growth and convergence. The American Economic Review, 92(3), 527–548.
  19. Kumbhakar, S. C., & Wang, H. J. (2005). Estimation of growth convergence using a stochastic production frontier approach. Economics Letters, 88(3), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.01.023
  20. Kumbhakar, S. C., Wang, H. J., & Horncastle, A. P. (2015). A practitioner’s guide to stochastic frontier analysis using Stata. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Le Mens, G., Hannan, M. T., & Pólos, L. (2015). Organizational obsolescence, drifting tastes, and age dependence in organizational life chances. Organization Science, 26(2), 550–570. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0910
  22. Liu, X., Siler, P., Wang, C., & Wei, Y. (2000). Productivity direct spillovers from foreign from data. Journal of International Business studies, 31(3), 407–425.
  23. Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(88)90168-7
  24. Machmud, A., Nandiyanto, A. B. D., & Dirgantari, P. D. (2018). Technical efficiency chemical Industry in Indonesia: Stochastic Frontier Analysis (SFA) Approach. Pertanika Journal of Science & Technology, 26(3), 1453–1464.
  25. Mastromarco, C., & Ghosh, S. (2009). Foreign capital, human capital, and efficiency: A stochastic frontier analysis for developing countries. World Development Review, 37(2), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2008.05.009
  26. Mok, V., Yeung, G., Han, Z., & Li, Z. (2010). Competition between online and physical stores: The implications of providing product information by Pure-Play E-tailer Ryohei. Managerial and Decision Economics, 31, 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde
  27. Narjoko, D. A., & Hill, H. (2007). Winners and losers during a deep economic crisis: Firm-level evidence from Indonesian manufacturing. Asian Economics Journal, 21(4), 343–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8381.2007.00261.x
  28. OECD. (2011). ISIC REV. 3 technology intensity definition.
  29. Orlic, E., Hashi, I., & Hisarciklilar, M. (2018). Cross-sectoral FDI spillovers and their impact on manufacturing. International Business Review, 27(4), 777–796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2018.01.002
  30. Rebelo, S. (1991). Long-run policy analysis and long-run growth, 99(3), 500–521. https://doi.org/10.1086/261764
  31. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
  32. Sari, D. W. (2019). The potential horizontal and vertical spillovers from foreign direct investment on Indonesian manufacturing Industries. Economic Papers, 38(4), 299–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12264
  33. Sari, D. W., Khalifah, N. A., & Suyanto, S. (2016). The spillover effects of foreign direct investment on the firms’ productivity performances. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 46(2–3), 199–233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-016-0484-0
  34. Sengupta, J. K. (1995). Dynamics of data envelopment analysis: Theory of system efficiency. Springer Science Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8506-4
  35. Smeets, R. (2008). Collecting the pieces of the FDI knowledge spillovers puzzle. World Bank Research Observer, 23(2), 107–138. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkn003
  36. Suyanto, & Salim, R. A. (2010). Sources of productivity gains from FDI in Indonesia: Is it efficiency improvement or technological progress? Developing Economies, 48(4), 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2010.00115.x
  37. Walheer, B., & He, M. (2020). Technical efficiency and technology gap of the manufacturing industry in China: Does firm ownership matter? World Development, 127, 104769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104769
  38. Wang, M., & Wong, M. C. S. (2012). International R&D transfer and technical efficiency: Evidence from panel study using stochastic frontier analysis. World Development, 40(10), 1982–1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.05.001
  39. Yang, S. F., Chen, K. M., & Huang, T. H. (2013). Outward foreign direct investment and technical efficiency: Evidence from Taiwan’s manufacturing firms. Journal of Asian Economics, 27, 7–17.
  40. Yasin, M. Z. (2021). Technical efficiency and total factor productivity growth of Indonesian manufacturing industry: Does openness matter? Studies in Microeconomics, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/23210222211024438
  41. Zhao, G., & Zhang, Z. (2010). Uncovering the relationship between FDI, human capital and technological progress in Chinese high-technology industries. China and World Economy, 18(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-124X.2010.01182.x
No Related Submission Found