Article Sidebar

Submitted
June 10, 2022
Accepted
April 4, 2023
Published
April 29, 2023
Download
Full Text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 566 Download : 1318

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This paper examines the effect of global economic policy uncertainty (EPU) on emerging markets (EMs) export flows.


Methods – This paper uses a structural panel vector autoregression modeling approach to capture country interdependencies and the likelihood that EMs’ responses are heterogeneous and dynamic. An unbalanced monthly panel data from 2003:01 to 2019:12 is used to estimate impulse responses and variance decompositions not only for the entire panel data but also for each EM.


Findings – The results show that global EPU has a persistent and negative effect on exports, while foreign income and the exchange rate increase export volumes in EMs. Given the different responses of EMs to uncertainty shocks, the second-stage regression estimates suggest that greater sectoral export diversification in an EM can potentially reduce the unfavorable impact of global EPU on their export flows. Meanwhile, the higher technology content of exports leads to a multiplication of global EPU transmissions.


Implication – These findings advance the literature by highlighting the importance of accounting for the transmission effect of global EPU in EMs by considering country heterogeneity.


Originality – This is the sole paper examining the factors that mitigate or amplify GEPU impacts on export flows by estimating second-step ordinary least square equations.

Keywords

Export panel data analysis Emerging Markets

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Caglayan Aslan, Senay Acikgoz

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Economic Journal of Emerging Markets by Center for Economic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Aslan, C., & Acikgoz, S. (2023). Are the global economic policy uncertainties blocking the export flows of emerging markets? A heterogeneous panel SVAR analysis. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 15(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol15.iss1.art7
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Ahmed, S., Appendino, M. A., & Ruta, M. (2015). Depreciations without exports? Global value chains and the exchange rate elasticity of exports (Policy Research Working Paper Series No. 7390).
  2. Amiti, M., Itskhoki, O., & Konings, J. (2014). Why hasn’t the Yen depreciation spurred Japanese exports? Liberty street economics. Retrieved from https://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2014/07/why-hasnt-the-yen-depreciation-spurred-japanese-exports/
  3. Aslan, Ç., & Acikgoz, S. (2021). Analysis of global economic policy uncertainty and export flows for emerging markets with panel VAR modeling. International Journal of Emerging Markets, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-12-2020-1570
  4. Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (1986). Determinants of international trade flows: The case of developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 20(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(86)90007-6
  5. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring economic policy uncertainty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
  6. Bernanke, B. S. (1983). Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(1), 85–109.
  7. Bianchi, D., Buchner, M., & Tamoni, A. (2019). Bond risk premia with machine learning (WBS Finance Group Research Paper No. 252). Los Angeles. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3232721
  8. Borojo, D. G., Yushi, J., Miao, M., & Liu, Y. (2023). The impacts of trade policy uncertainty on trade flow of emerging economies and low-income developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 36(1), 1055–1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2081235
  9. Carballo, J., Handley, K., & Limão, N. (2022). Economic and policy uncertainty: Aggregate export dynamics and the value of agreements. Journal of International Economics, 139, 103661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2022.103661
  10. Cepni, O., Gupta, R., Güney, I. E., & Yilmaz, M. (2020). Forecasting local currency bond risk premia of emerging markets: The role of cross-country macrofinancial linkages. Journal of Forecasting, 39(6), 966–985. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.2669
  11. Constantinescu, C., Mattoo, A., & Ruta, M. (2020). Policy uncertainty, trade and global value chains: Some facts, many questions. Review of Industrial Organization, 57(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11151-020-09772-0
  12. Dixit, A. (1989). Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 620–638. https://doi.org/10.1086/261619
  13. Góes, C. (2016). Testing Piketty’s hypothesis on the drivers of income inequality: Evidence from panel vars with heterogeneous dynamics (IMF Working Papers No. 160). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475523249.001
  14. Gül, S. (2018). Asymmetric impact of real exchange rate on the export flows in Turkey (Working Paper of Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey No. 18/12).
  15. Gül, S., & Gupta, R. (2021). Time-varying impact of global, region-and country-specific uncertainties on the volatility of international trade. Contemporary Economic Policy, 39(4), 691–700.
  16. Haddad, M., Lim, J. J., Pancaro, C., & Saborowski, C. (2013). Trade openness reduces growth volatility when countries are well diversified. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’économique, 46(2), 765–790. https://doi.org/10.1111/caje.12031
  17. Hailemariam, A., & Ivanovski, K. (2021). The effect of economic policy uncertainty on US tourism net exports. Tourism Economics, 28(8), 2219–2227. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166211025334
  18. Handley, K., & Limão, N. (2017). Policy uncertainty, trade, and welfare: Theory and evidence for China and the United States. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2731–2783. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20141419
  19. Hanson, G. H. (2012). The rise of middle kingdoms: Emerging economies in global trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(2), 41–64. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.2.41
  20. He, F., Ma, F., Wang, Z., & Yang, B. (2021). Asymmetric volatility spillover between oil-importing and oil-exporting countries’ economic policy uncertainty and China’s energy sector. International Review of Financial Analysis, 75, 101739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2021.101739
  21. Hlatshwayo, S., & Saxegaard, M. (2016). The consequences of policy uncertainty: Disconnects and dilutions in the South African real effective exchange rate-export relationship (IMF Working Papers No. 113). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484383490.001
  22. Hnatkovska, V., & Loayza, N. (2003). Volatility and growth (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3184). Washington, D. C.
  23. Hu, G., & Liu, S. (2021). Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU) and China’s export fluctuation in the post-pandemic era: An empirical analysis based on the TVP-SV-VAR model. Frontiers in Public Health, 9, 788171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.788171
  24. Jia, F., Huang, X., Xu, X., & Sun, H. (2020). The effects of economic policy uncertainty on export: A gravity model approach”. Prague Economic Papers, 29(5), 600–622. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.754
  25. Khalfaoui, R., Solarin, S. A., Al-Qadasi, A., & Ben Jabeur, S. (2022). Dynamic causality interplay from COVID-19 pandemic to oil price, stock market, and economic policy uncertainty: Evidence from oil-importing and oil-exporting countries. Annals of Operations Research, 313(1), 105–143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-04446-w
  26. Krol, R. (2018). Does uncertainty over economic policy harm trade, foreign investment, and prosperity? SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3169563
  27. Liu, L., Zhang, M., & Li, W. (2020). China’s economic policy uncertainty shocks and South Korea’s exports: A TVP-VAR approach with an SMSS structure. Journal of Korea Trade, 24(4), 1–17.
  28. Mishra, P., Montiel, P., Pedroni, P., & Spilimbergo, A. (2014). Monetary policy and bank lending rates in low-income countries: Heterogeneous panel estimates. Journal of Development Economics, 111, 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2014.08.005
  29. Pedroni, P. (2013). Structural panel VARs. Econometrics. https://doi.org/10.3390/econometrics1020180
  30. Ramey, G., & Ramey, V. A. (1995). Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth. The American Economic Review, 85(5), 1138–1151.
  31. Salinas, G. (2021). Proximity and horizontal policies: The backbone of export diversification and complexity (IMF Working Paper No. 064). https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513571614.001
  32. Wei, Y. (2019). Oil price shocks, economic policy uncertainty and China’s trade: A quantitative structural analysis. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 48, 20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2018.08.016
  33. Zhao, T. (2022). Economic policy uncertainty and manufacturing value-added exports. Engineering Economics, 33(1), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.33.1.27373
No Related Submission Found