Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 9, 2023
Accepted
February 16, 2024
Published
April 25, 2024
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 314 Download : 321

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose ― This study investigates the factors affecting the learning outcomes of Asian students.
Methods ─ The effects of both educational inputs and economic and socioeconomic variables on the PISA scores of 10 Asian countries (Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Singapore, Macau, Korea, Turkey, Israel, Qatar, and Thailand) for the years 2006, 2009, 2012 and 2015 were examined using unbalanced panel data.
Findings ─ The results show that country-level economic factors strongly affect academic achievement. Furthermore, country-level economic factors dominate the other explanatory factors in the numerical and statistical sense.
Implication ─ The findings provide valuable information for educators, policymakers, and researchers aiming to develop efficient educational strategies to improve educational quality. Furthermore, the results offer policy suggestions for addressing factors that impact the quality of education both at the national and international levels.
Originality ─ This research enhances the current body of knowledge by investigating how economic and socioeconomic variables affect students' math, science, and reading performance, particularly emphasizing Asian countries.

Keywords

education Pisa test unbalanced panel data asian economies

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Ebru Çağlayan Akay, Zamira Oskonbaeva

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Economic Journal of Emerging Markets by Center for Economic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Zamira Oskonbaeva, Department of Economics, Kyrgyz-Turkish Manas University, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan

Department of Economics

How to Cite
Çağlayan Akay, E., & Oskonbaeva, Z. (2024). Investigating the factors affecting the PISA-based test performance of Asian students. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol16.iss1.art4
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Anil, D., & Ozer, Y. (2012). The effect of the aim and frequency of computer usage on student achievement according to PISA 2006. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5484-5488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.462
  2. Aristizábal, G.C., Giménez, G., & Ximénez de Embún, D.P. (2017). Educational inequalities in Latin America, PISA 2012: causes of differences in school performance between public and private schools. Revista De Educacion, 376, 33-61.
  3. Areepattamannil, S., & Caleon, I. S. (2013). Relationships of cognitive and metacognitive learning strategies to mathematics achievement in four high-performing East Asian education systems. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174(6), 696-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221325.2013.799057
  4. Baltagi, B. H., & Chang, Y.J. (1994). Incomplete panels: A comparative study of alternative estimators for the unbalanced one-way error component regression model. Journal of Econometrics, 62(2), 67-89.
  5. Baltagi, B. H., & Li, Q. (1990). A Lagrange multiplier test for the error components model with incomplete panels. Econometric Reviews, 9, 103-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939008800180
  6. Baltagi, B.H. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., Chichester.
  7. Baltagi, B.H. (1985). Pooling cross-sections with unequal time-series lengths. Economics Letters, 18, 133-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(85)90167-3
  8. Bedard, K., & Dhuey, E. (2006). The persistence of early childhood maturity: International evidence of long run age effects. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(4), 1437-1472. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.121.4.1437
  9. Benfratello, L. (2014). Random effects regression for panel data. In A.C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2402
  10. Biørn, E. (1981). Estimating economic relations from incomplete cross-section/time-series data. Journal of Econometrics, 16, 221-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(81)90109-3
  11. Bosworth, R. (2014). Class size, class composition, and the distribution of student achievement. Education Economics, 22(2), 141-165. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2011.568698
  12. Bouhlila, D. S. (2017). Parents' education and literacy skills: Evidence on inequality of socioeconomic status in Arab countries. World Development Perspectives, 5, 34-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2017.02.006
  13. Bray, M., & Kwok, P. (2003). Demand for private supplementary tutoring: Conceptual considerations, and socioeconomic patterns in Hong Kong. Economics of Education Review, 22, 611-620. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00032-3
  14. Byun, S., & Park, H. (2012). The academic success of East Asian American youth: The role of shadow education. Sociology of Education, 85, 40-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040711417009
  15. Chao, R., & Tseng, V. (2002). Parenting of Asians. In M.H. Bornstein (Ed.), Handbook of Parenting, Vol. 4: Social Conditions and Applied Parenting (pp. 59-93). Erlbaum.
  16. Cheang, C. J. Y., & Goh, E. C. L. (2018). Why some children from poor families do well: An in-depth analysis of positive deviance cases in Singapore. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 13(sup1).https://doi.org/10.1080/17482631.2018.1563431
  17. Cheung, K.C. (2017). The effects of resilience in learning variables on mathematical literacy performance: A study of learning characteristics of the academic resilient and advantaged low achievers in Shanghai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 965-982. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1194372
  18. Coleman, J. S., Campbell, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., ... & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, U.S. Government Printing Office.
  19. Davis-Kean, P. E. (2005). The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: The indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. Journal of Family Psychology, 19(2), 294-304. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.294
  20. Fredriksson, P., & Ockert, B. (2005). Is early learning really more productive? The effect of school starting age on school and labour market performance. IZA Discussion Paper no. 1659.
  21. Gamazo, A., & Martínez-Abad, F. (2020). An exploration of factors linked to academic performance in PISA 2018 through data mining techniques. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01106
  22. Giambona, F., & Porcu, M. (2018). School size and students' achievement: Empirical evidences from PISA survey data. Socioeconomic Planning Sciences, 64, 66-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2017.12.007
  23. Greene, W. H. (2012). Econometric Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson.
  24. Gujarati, D. N. (2016). Basic Econometrics (U.K. ed.). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-37502-5
  25. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011a). How much do educational outcomes matter in OECD countries? Economic Policy, 26(67), 427-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2011.00265.x
  26. Hanushek, E. A., & Woessmann, L. (2011b). The economics of international differences in educational achievement. In E.A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Education, 3, 89-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53429-3.00002-8
  27. Halle, T. G., Kurtz-Costes, B., & Mahoney, J. L. (1997). Family influences on school achievement in low-income, African American children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 527-537. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.527
  28. Ho, S. C. (2010). Family influences on science learning among Hong Kong adolescents: What we learned from PISA. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(3), 409-428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-010-9198-3
  29. Hossain, R., Roy, C. K., & Akter, R. (2022). The effects of foreign direct investment and trade openness on economic growth amid crises in Asian economies. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(2), 231-243. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss2.art7
  30. Jerrim, J. (2015). Why do East Asian children perform so well in PISA? An investigation of Western-born children of East Asian descent. Oxford Review of Education, 41(3), 310-333. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2015.1028525
  31. Jerrim J., & Choi, A. (2014). The mathematics skills of school children: How does England compare to the high-performing East Asian jurisdictions? Journal of Education Policy, 29(3), 349-376. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.831950
  32. Karakolidis, A., Pitsia, V., & Emvalotis, A. (2016). Examining students' achievement in mathematics: A multilevel analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2012 data for Greece. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 106-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.05.013
  33. Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W.A. (2001). Teacher quality and student achievement: Recommendations for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 85(628), 64-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650108562808
  34. Khan, Z., Rabbi, F., Ahmad, M., & Siqun, Y. (2019). Remittances inflow and private investment: A case study of South Asian economies via panel data analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 32(1), 2723-2742. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2019.1655464
  35. Lau, K.C., & Lam, T.Y. (2017). Instructional practices and science performance of 10 top-performing regions in PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2128-2149. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1387947
  36. Lam, T.Y., & Lau, K.C. (2014). Examining factors affecting science achievement of Hong Kong in PISA 2006 using hierarchical linear modeling. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2463-2480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.879223
  37. Leung, F. (2006). Mathematics education in East Asia and the West: Does culture matter? In F. Leung, K.-D. Graf, & F. Lopez-Real (Eds.), Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions: A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West (pp. 21-46). Springer.
  38. Li, H., Lei, P.W., & Pace, C.L. (2013). Reading subskill differences between students in Shanghai-China and the U.S.: Evidence from PISA 2009. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(6), 490-509. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.803439
  39. Lin, S.W., Tzou, H.I., Lu, I.C., & Hung, P.H. (2021). Taiwan: Performance in the Programme for International Student Assessment. In N. Crato (Ed.), Improving a Country's Education (pp. 179-194). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59031-4_10
  40. Lynn, R., & Meisenberg, G. (2010). National I.Q.s calculated and validated for 108 nations. Intelligence, 38, 353-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2010.04.007
  41. Manning, M. L. (1998). Gender differences in young adolescents' mathematics and science achievement. Childhood Education, 74, 168-171. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1998.10522697
  42. Marks, G. N. (2016). The relative effects of socioeconomic, demographic, non-cognitive and cognitive influences on student achievement in Australia. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.012
  43. Meroni, E. C., Vera-Toscano, E., & Costa, P. (2015). Can low skill teachers make good students? Empirical evidence from PIAAC and PISA. Journal of Policy Modeling, 37(2), 308-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2015.02.006
  44. Meng, L., Muñoz, M., Hess, K.K., & Liu, S. (2017). Effective teaching factors and student reading strategies as predictors of student achievement in PISA 2009: The case of China and the United States. Educational Review, 69(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1155537
  45. Mikk, J. (2015). Explaining the difference between PISA 2009 reading scores in Finland and Estonia. Educational Research and Evaluation, 21(4), 324-342. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2015.1062400
  46. Myrberg, E. (2007). The effect of formal teacher education on reading achievement of 3rd-grade students in public and independent schools in Sweden. Educational Studies, 33(2), 145-162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690601068311
  47. OECD (2013). Asian countries top OECD's latest PISA survey on state of global education. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/asian-countries-top-oecd-s-latest-pisa-survey-on-state-of-global-education.htm
  48. OECD (2014b). PISA in Focus 2014/02. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/
  49. Özberk, E.H., Kabasakal, K.A., & Boztunç Öztürk, N. (2017). Investigating the factors affecting Turkish students' PISA 2012 mathematics achievement using hierarchical linear modeling. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H. U. Journal of Education), 32(3), 544-559. https://doi.org/10.16986/HUJE.2017026950
  50. Pong, S. (1997). Family structure, school context, and eighth-grade math and reading achievement. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 59, 734-746. https://doi.org/10.2307/353957
  51. Pong, S. (1998). The school compositional effect of single parenthood on 10th-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 71, 23-42. https://doi.org/10.2307/2673220
  52. Pitsia, V., Biggart, A., & Karakolidis, A. (2017). The role of students' self-beliefs, motivation and attitudes in predicting mathematics achievement: A multilevel analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment data. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 163-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.014
  53. Puhani, P., & Weber, A. (2007). Does the early bird catch the worm? Instrumental variable estimates of educational effects of age of school entry in Germany. Empirical Economics, 32(2-3), 359-386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-006-0089-y
  54. Pulkkinen, J., & Rautopuro, J. (2022). The correspondence between PISA performance and school achievement in Finland. International Journal of Educational Research, 114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.103717
  55. Quayes, S. (2015). Outreach and performance of microfinance institutions: A panel analysis. Applied Economics, 47(18), 1909-1925. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.1002891
  56. Rajchert, J.M., Żółtak, T., & Smulczyk, M. (2014). Predicting reading literacy and its improvement in the Polish national extension of the PISA study: The role of intelligence, trait- and state-anxiety, socioeconomic status and school-type. Learning and Individual Differences, 33, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.04.003
  57. Reparaz, C., & Sotés-Elizalde, M.A. (2019). Parental involvement in schools in Spain and Germany: Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.10.001
  58. Rodríguez-Mantilla, J. M., Fernández-Díaz, M., & Jover Olmeda, G. (2018). PISA 2015: Predictores del rendimiento en Ciencias en España: PISA 2015: Predictors of Science Performance in Spain. Ministerio de Educación.
  59. Schneider, B., & Lee, Y. (1990). A model for academic success: The school and home environment of East Asian students. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 21(4), 358-377. https://doi.org/10.1525/aeq.1990.21.4.04x0596x
  60. Sun, L., Bradley, K. D., & Akers, K. (2012). A multilevel modelling approach to investigating factors impacting science achievement for secondary school students: PISA Hong Kong Sample. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2107-2125. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.708063
  61. Tan, L.C., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2011). Creating effective teachers and leaders in Singapore. In L. Darling-Hammond & R. Rothman (Eds.), Teacher and Leader Effectiveness in High Performing Education Systems (pp. 33-41). Alliance for Excellent Education and Stanford.
  62. Wilson, C. (2011). The effects of class size on students' academic achievement. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Phoenix). Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/866853606
  63. Wansbeek, T., & Kapteyn, A. (1989). Estimation of the error-components model with incomplete panels. Journal of Econometrics, 41(3), 341-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(89)90066-3
  64. World Bank (2018). World Development Indicators database. Retrieved from https://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=world-development-indicators
  65. Zhao, Y. (2014a). How does PISA put the world at risk (part 4): Misleading the world. Retrieved from http://zhaolearning.com/2014/03/29/how-does-pisa-put-the-world-at-risk-part-4-misleading-the-world/#_ftn1
  66. Zhao, Y. (2014b). Who's Afraid of the Big Bad Dragon? Why China Has the Best (and Worst) Education System in the World. Jossey-Bass.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

No Related Submission Found