Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 16, 2023
Accepted
November 1, 2023
Published
October 27, 2024
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 34 Download : 31

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose ― The study investigates the impact of the efficiency of Islamic banks on banking stability.
Method ― A panel data analysis using the Least Square Dummy Variable Corrected (LSDVC) method is employed to examine the impact of efficiency on banking stability in Islamic banks. The study has a sample of 54 Islamic banks across eight countries from 2013 to 2021.
Findings ― The findings reveal that the efficiency of Islamic banks has a positive and significant effect on banking stability. In addition, financial turmoil negatively and significantly affects the stability of Islamic banks but does not significantly affect institutional development. Additionally, financial turmoil can influence how effectively Islamic banks manage their businesses in response to banking stability. The outcomes are robust across various robustness methods.
Implications ― The results imply that the efficiency of Islamic banks has a pivotal role in banking stability, considering the efficiency level. To ensure the stability of Islamic banks, practitioners and regulators of Islamic banks have to achieve and maintain the efficiency of Islamic banks by implementing the required policies and guidelines.
Originality/Value ― Previous studies examining the impact of Islamic banks' efficiency on banking stability remain limited. The paper fills the research gap by examining how Islamic bank efficiency affects banking stability, considering the effects of financial turmoil and institutional development.

Keywords

Islamic bank Banking stability LSDVC Institutional development efficiency performance

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Faaza Fakhrunnas, Younes Boubechtoula, Katiya Nahda, Mohammad Rezoanul Hoque

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Economic Journal of Emerging Markets by Center for Economic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Fakhrunnas, F., Boubechtoula, Y. ., Nahda, K. ., & Rezoanul Hoque, M. (2024). Islamic bank stability and efficiency: A cross-country analysis. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(2), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol16.iss2.art2
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Abedifar, P., Molyneux, P., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Risk in Islamic banking. Review of Finance, 17(6), 2035–2096. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rfs041
  2. Ahmad, W., & Luo, R. H. (2010). Comparison of banking efficiency in Europe: Islamic versus conventional banks. International Finance Review, 11(2010), 361–389. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1569-3767(2010)0000011016
  3. Albaity, M., Mallek, R. S., Abu, A. H., & Al-Tamimi, H. A. H. (2022). Bank credit growth and trust: Does institutional quality matter? Evidence from the association of Southeast Asian Nations. Asian Development Review, 39(2), 223–259. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0116110522500172
  4. Ali, S. S. (2007). Financial distress and bank failure: Lessons from closure of Ihlas Finans in Turkey. Islamic Economic Studies, 14(1), 1–52.
  5. Al-Khasawneh, J. A., Bassedat, K., Aktan, B., & Darshini Pun Thapa, P. (2012). Efficiency of Islamic banks: case of North African Arab countries. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 4(2–3), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1108/17554171211252547
  6. Alqahtani, F., Mayes, D. G., & Brown, K. (2017). Islamic bank efficiency compared to conventional banks during the global crisis in the GCC region. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 51, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2017.08.010
  7. Alsharif, M. (2021). Risk, efficiency and capital in a dual banking industry: Evidence from GCC banks. Managerial Finance, 47(8), 1213–1232. https://doi.org/10.1108/MF-10-2020-0529
  8. Anto, M. H., Fakhrunnas, F., & Tumewang, Y. K. (2022). Islamic banks credit risk performance for home financing: Before and during Covid-19 pandemic. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol14.iss1.art9
  9. Asmild, M., Kronborg, D., Mahbub, T., & Matthews, K. (2019). The efficiency patterns of Islamic banks during the global financial crisis: The case of Bangladesh. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 74, 67–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2018.04.004
  10. Aysun, U. (2016). Bank size and macroeconomic shock transmission: Does the credit channel operate through large or small banks? Journal of International Money and Finance, 65, 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2016.04.001
  11. Azmi, W., Hassan, M. K., Houston, R., & Karim, M. S. (2021). ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 70, 101277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2020.101277
  12. Bruno, G. S. F. (2005). Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Economics Letters, 87(3), 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2005.01.005
  13. Castro, V. (2013). Macroeconomic determinants of the credit risk in the banking system: The case of the GIPSI. Economic Modelling, 31(1), 672–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.01.027
  14. Chiaramonte, L., Liu, F. H., Poli, F., & Zhou, M. (2016). How accurately can Z-score predict bank failure? Financial Markets, Institutions and Instruments, 25(5), 333–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/fmii.12077
  15. Chong, B. S., & Liu, M.-H. (2009). Islamic banking: Interest-free or interest-based? Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 17(1), 125–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2007.12.003
  16. Dang, V. A., Kim, M., & Shin, Y. (2015). In search of robust methods for dynamic panel data models in empirical corporate finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 53, 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.12.009
  17. Danlami, M. R., Abduh, M., & Abdul Razak, L. (2022). CAMELS, risk-sharing financing, institutional quality and stability of Islamic banks: Evidence from 6 OIC countries. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 13(8), 1155–1175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-08-2021-0227
  18. Demir, E., & Danisman, G. O. (2021). Banking sector reactions to COVID-19: The role of bank-specific factors and government policy responses. Research in International Business and Finance, 58(June 2020), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101508
  19. Elnahass, M., Trinh, V. Q., & Li, T. (2021). Global banking stability in the shadow of Covid-19 outbreak. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 72, 101322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101322
  20. Fakhrunnas, F., Nugrohowati, R. N. I., Haron, R., & Anto, M. B. H. (2022). The determinants of non-performing loans in the Indonesian banking industry: An asymmetric approach before and during the pandemic crisis. SAGE Open, 12(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221102421
  21. Fakhrunnas, F., Tumewang, Y. K., & Anto, M. B. H. (2021). The impact of inflation on Islamic banks’ home financing risk: Before and during the COVID-19 outbreak. Banks and Bank Systems, 16(2), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(2).2021.08
  22. Hidayat, S. E., Sakti, M. R. P., & Al-Balushi, R. A. A. (2021). Risk, efficiency and financial performance in the GCC banking industry: Islamic versus conventional banks. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 12(4), 564–592. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-05-2020-0138
  23. Ibrahim, M. H., & Rizvi, S. A. R. (2017). Do we need bigger Islamic banks? An assessment of bank stability. Journal of Multinational Financial Management, 40, 77–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mulfin.2017.05.002
  24. ICD-Refinitiv. (2022). ICD-refinitiv Islamic finance development report 2022; Embracing Change.
  25. Law, S. H., Naseem, N. A. M., Lau, W. T., & Trinugroho, I. (2020). Can innovation improve income inequality? Evidence from panel data. Economic Systems, 44(4), 100815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100815
  26. Meisamy, H., & Gholipour, H. F. (2020). Challenges facing Islamic banking in Iran: Evaluation and policy implications. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 6(3), 621–640.
  27. Miah, M. D., & Sharmeen, K. (2015). Relationship between capital, risk and efficiency: A comparative study between Islamic and conventional banks of Bangladesh. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 8(2), 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2014-0027
  28. Miah, M. D., & Uddin, H. (2017). Efficiency and stability: A comparative study between Islamic and conventional banks in GCC countries. Future Business Journal, 3(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2017.11.001
  29. Nabi, M. S., & Suliman, M. O. (2009). Institutions, banking development, and economic growth. Developing Economies, 47(4), 436–457. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1049.2009.00093.x
  30. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effect. In Econometrica (Vol. 49, Issue 6, pp. 1417–1426).
  31. Rashid, A., & Jabeen, S. (2016). Analyzing performance determinants: Conventional versus Islamic Banks in Pakistan. Borsa Istanbul Review, 16(2), 92–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2016.03.002
  32. Rosman, R., Wahab, N. A., & Zainol, Z. (2014). Efficiency of Islamic banks during the financial crisis: An analysis of Middle Eastern and Asian countries. Pacific Basin Finance Journal, 28, 76–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2013.11.001
  33. Saeed, M., & Izzeldin, M. (2016). Examining the relationship between default risk and efficiency in Islamic and conventional banks. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 132, 127–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.02.014
  34. Safiullah, M., & Shamsuddin, A. (2022). Technical efficiency of Islamic and conventional banks with undesirable output: Evidence from a stochastic meta-frontier directional distance function. Global Finance Journal, 51, 100547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2020.100547
  35. Sakti, M. R. P., & Mohamad, A. (2018). Efficiency, stability and asset quality of Islamic vis-à-vis conventional banks: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 9(3), 378–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-07-2015-0031
  36. Shakil, M. H., Mahmood, N., Tasnia, M., & Munim, Z. H. (2019). Do environmental, social and governance performance affect the financial performance of banks? A cross-country study of emerging market banks. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(6), 1331–1344. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-08-2018-0155
  37. Terraza, V. (2015). The effect of bank size on risk ratios: Implications of banks’ performance. Procedia Economics and Finance, 30(15), 903–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01340-4
No Related Submission Found