Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 30, 2024
Accepted
October 28, 2024
Published
October 31, 2024
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 85 Download : 26

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose ― This paper evaluates Indonesia's trade integration efforts and their impact on export competitiveness from 1989 to 2021. It examines the evolution of trade arrangements, starting with the ASEAN Preferential Trade Arrangement (APTA) and progressing to bilateral agreements.
Methods ― Based on Leamer and Stern, the Constant Market Share Analysis (CMSA) measures Indonesia’s export competitiveness over the years.
Findings ― The results indicate no significant improvement in competitiveness during the analysis period, with export growth primarily driven by the effect of world growth. Although competitiveness did not shift markedly over time, it remained positive overall, suggesting a buffer effect during economic crises.
Implications ― The paper suggests Indonesia should pursue deeper trade integration and unilateral economic reforms. Drawing on Korea’s experience, combining export promotion policies with trade agreements could enhance market access and foster internal competitiveness.
Originality ― This study provides long-term insights into Indonesia’s export competitiveness amidst global trade integration efforts and offers policy recommendations based on the success of Korea’s trade reforms.

Keywords

Constant Market Share Analysis Free Trade Agreement competitiveness decomposition Trade Integration

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Nur Rakhman Setyoko, Rofikoh Rokhim, Ibrahim Kholilul Rohman, Ph.D., Muhammad Syaroni Rofii, Ph.D

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Economic Journal of Emerging Markets by Center for Economic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Setyoko, N. R., Rokhim, R. ., Rohman, I. K. ., & Rofii, M. S. (2024). Indonesia’s export growth decomposition in ASEAN and ASEAN dialogue partners. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(2), 178–190. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol16.iss2.art7
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. ASEAN Secretariat. (2023). RCEP, https://asean.org/our-communities/economic-community/integration-with-global-economy/the-regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-rcep/ (downloaded 31 October 2023)
  2. Abbas, M., Duchesne, E. (2023). Beyond the Failure of the WTO: Resilience of Trade Multilateralism. In: Guilbaud, A., Petiteville, F., Ramel, F. (eds) Crisis of Multilateralism? Challenges and Resilience. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39671-7_10
  3. Amsden, A. H. (2007). Why Korea Switched: From Import Substitution to Export-Led Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Aslam, M., & Yee, L. S. (2023). The Role of Japanese Foreign Direct Investment in Growth and Trade Development of ASEAN Economies. Journal of Management & Training for Industries, 10(2). http://dx.doi.org/10.12792/JMTI.10.2.37
  5. Aswicahyono, H., & Hill, H. (2016). Is Indonesia trapped in the middle?. In Asia and the Middle-Income Trap. Routledge. 101-125.
  6. Aswicahyono, H., & Rafitrandi, D. (2018). A review of Indonesia’s economic competitiveness. Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
  7. Balassa, B. (1976). Types of Economic Integration. In: Machlup, F. (eds) Economic Integration: Worldwide, Regional, Sectoral. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-02571-8_2
  8. Balassa, B. (1977). ‘Revealed’ comparative advantage revisited: An analysis of relative export shares of the industrial countries, 1953–1971. The Manchester School, 45(4), 327-344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1977.tb00701.x
  9. Baldwin, R. E. (2006). Failure of the World Trade Ministerial Conference at Cancun: Reason and Remedies. World Economy, 29 (6), 677 – 696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9701.2006.00815.x
  10. Basri, M. C., Rahardja, S., & Fitrania, S. N. (2016). Not a trap, but slow transition? Indonesia's pursuit to high income status. Asian Economic Papers, 15(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1162/ASEP_a_00422
  11. Blanga-Gubbay, M. B., & Rubinova, S. (2023). Is the global economy fragmenting?. WTO Staff Working Paper, Economic Research and Statistics Division, WTO. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/280428
  12. Boediono. (2016). Ekonomi Indonesia dalam lintasan sejarah. Mizan.
  13. Fagerberg, J., & Sollie, G. (1987). The method of constant market shares analysis reconsidered. Applied Economics, 19(12), 1571-1583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036848700000084
  14. Fiorentino, R. V., Verdeja, L., & Toqueboeuf, C. (2007). The changing landscape of regional trade agreements: 2006 update (No. 12). WTO discussion paper. https://hdl.handle.net/10419/107047
  15. Galovic, T. (2021). International competitiveness of ASEAN regional integration. Ekonomski vjesnik/Econviews-Review of Contemporary Business, Entrepreneurship and Economic Issues, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.51680/ev.34.1.2
  16. Haggard, S., Kim, B. K., & Moon, C. I. (1991). The transition to export-led growth in South Korea: 1954–1966. The Journal of Asian Studies, 50(4), 850-873. https://doi.org/10.2307/2058544
  17. Hoekman, B., Mattoo, A., & English, P. (2002). Development, Trade, and the WTO: A Handbook. Italy: World Bank.
  18. Kim, S. Y. (2015). Deep integration and regional trade agreements. The Oxford handbook of the political economy of international trade, 360-379.
  19. Krugman, P. R., & Obstfeld, M., (2009). International economics: Theory and Policy. 6th Edition, Pearson Education.
  20. Lall, S. (2000). The Technological structure and performance of developing country manufactured exports, 1985‐98. Oxford development studies, 28(3), 337-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/713688318
  21. Leal-Arcas, R. (2011). Proliferation of Regional Trade Agreements: Complementing or Supplanting Multilateralism?. Chicago Journal of International Law, 11(2). https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/cjil/vol11/iss2/23
  22. Leamer, E.E. & Stern, R.M. (1970). Quantitative International Economics. Aldine Publishing Co. Chicago.
  23. Mattoo, A., Rocha, N., & Ruta, M. (2020). The evolution of deep trade agreements. Washington, DC: World Bank.
  24. Ministry of Trade Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Ministry of Trade Republic of Indonesia. Peluncuran Perundingan Perjanjian Perdagangan Bebas Indonesia dan Persatuan Ekonomi Eurasia. https://www.kemendag.go.id/berita/foto/peluncuran-perjanjian-perdagangan-bebas-indonesia-dan-persatuan-ekonomi-eurasia.
  25. Mistry, P. S. (1995). Open regionalism: Stepping stone or millstone toward an improved multilateral system?. Regionalism and the Global Economy: The Case of Latin America and the Caribbean, 1-15.
  26. Narlikar, A., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). Collapse at the WTO: A Cancun Post-Modern. Third World Quarterly, 25 (3), 447 – 460. https://doi.org/10.1080/0143659042000191375
  27. Pangestu, M., Rahardja, S., & Ing, L. Y. (2015). Fifty years of trade policy in Indonesia: New world trade, old treatments. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 51(2), 239-261. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1061915
  28. Petrović, P., Antevski, M., & Vesić, D. (2008). The international competitiveness and economic integration. Facta Universitatis Series: Economics and Organization. 5(1), 1-8.
  29. Rahmadi, R., & Ichihashi, M. (2012). How do export structure and competitiveness evolve since trade liberalization? An overview and assessment of Indonesian manufacturing export performance. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance. 3(4), 272-280. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2012.V3.213
  30. Rahman, N., Rahman, M. N., Manini, M. M., & Sharma, K. (2024). Determinants of global value chain participation in regional trade agreements: the case of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). Journal of Industrial and Business Economics. 51(1), 111-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-023-00281-1
  31. Rajagopalan, S. (2021). The 1991 Reforms and the Quest for Economic Freedom in India. Capitalism & Society. 15(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3985599
  32. Reiterer, M., & Houng, L. I. (2023). The Economic Security Tightrope: EU Economic Security Strategy, Friend-Shoring, and European Relations with Indo-Pacific States. Institute for National Security Strategy. 169.
  33. Richardson, J. D. (1971). Some sensitivity tests for a" constant-market-shares" analysis of export growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 300-304. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937978
  34. Samuelson, P. A., & Nordhaus, W. D., (2009). Economics. McGraw-Hill Education.
  35. Stojanovic, Z., Mitrovic, R. D., & Petrovic, I. P. (2013). Serbia’s food trade competitiveness and PTAs in the EU integration process. Research in Agricultural & Applied Economics. http://dx.doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.160512
  36. Suryanta, B. (2021). Indonesia's integration into the regional and global economies. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/6073e7bd03c5b9274751137e/t/6440ccbd42648732a27501a5/1681968331454/Suryanta_Thesis_2021.pdf
  37. Tyszynski, H. (1951). World trade in manufactured commodities, 1899‐19501. The Manchester School, 19(3), 272-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1951.tb00012.x
  38. Widodo, T. (2010). Market dynamics in the EU, NAFTA, North East Asia and ASEAN: the method of constant market shares (CMS) analysis. Journal of Economic Integration, 480-500. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23000869
  39. WTO Secretariat, (2007). Trade Policy Review: Indonesia Secretariat Report, https://docs.wto.org/dol2fe/Pages/FE_Search/MultiDDFDocuments/19103/Q:/WT/TPR/S184-00.pdf;Q:/WT/TPR/S184-01.pdf;Q:/WT/TPR/S184-02.pdf;Q:/WT/TPR/S184-03.pdf;Q:/WT/TPR/S184-04.pdf;Q:/WT/TPR/S184-05.pdf/
  40. WTO Secretariat, (2020). Trade Policy Review: Indonesia Secretariat Report, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/tpr_e/tp501_e.htm
No Related Submission Found