Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 19, 2024
Accepted
October 16, 2024
Published
October 29, 2024
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 191 Download : 111

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose ― This study investigates the effect of trade openness on inflation, referred to as the Romer hypothesis, for Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs) from 1990 to 2022.
Methods ― It uses a panel ARDL method and the Dumitrescu-Hurlin (2012) causality test. Economic growth, credit, and money supply are included in the model as independent variables.
Findings ― The findings reveal no statistically significant long-term and short-term relationships between trade openness and inflation. However, money supply has statistically significant positive effects on inflation in the long run, while economic growth and credit exhibit no statistically significant impact. In the short run, money supply and economic growth reduced inflation. According to the Dumitrescu-Hurlin (2012) panel causality test, a bidirectional relationship exists between inflation and economic growth, money supply, and credit, while a unidirectional relationship is observed between inflation and trade openness.
Implications ― Reducing the external dependency of sectors that rely on imported inputs is necessary to mitigate the adverse effects of trade openness on inflation in NICs. It is crucial to ensure that monetary policy helps align money supply and credit expansions with real sector trends.
Originality ― This research is pioneering in its focus on testing the Romer hypothesis for Newly Industrialized Countries (NICs).

Keywords

Romer Hypothesis Trade openness Panel ARDL New industrialization countries

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Hüseyin Çelik, Nigar Alev, Muhyettin Erdemli

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Economic Journal of Emerging Markets by Center for Economic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Hüseyin Çelik, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkiye

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, Dicle University, Diyarbakır, Turkiye

 

Nigar Alev, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van,Turkiye

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van,Turkiye

 

Muhyettin Erdemli, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, Siirt University, Siirt,Turkiye

Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Department of Economics, Siirt University, Siirt,Turkiye

How to Cite
Çelik, H. ., Alev, N. ., & Erdemli, M. (2024). Is the Romer Hypothesis valid for Newly Industrialized Countries? Evidence from panel ARDL. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol16.iss2.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Akinbobola, T. O. (2012). The Dynamics of Money Supply, Exchange Rate and Inflation in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 2(4), 117–141.
  2. Ali, A. K., & Asfaw, D. M. (2023). Nexus between Inflation, Income Inequality, and Economic Growth in Ethiopia. PLoS ONE, 18(11 November). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0294454
  3. Ali, A., Khokhar, B., & Sulehri, F. A. (2023). Financial Dimensions of Inflationary Pressure in Developing Countries: An In-depth Analysis of Policy Mix. Journal of Asian Development Studies, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.62345/jads.2023.12.3.103
  4. Aliyev, K., & Gasimov, I. (2014). Openness-Inflation Nexus in South Caucasus Economies. MPRA Paper. https://ideas.repec.org/p/pra/mprapa/62761.html
  5. Atgür, M. (2021). Türkiye’de Ticari Açıklık ve Enflasyon İlişkisi: Romer Hipotezi Türkiye’de Geçerli midir? Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.35379/CUSOSBIL.759390
  6. Binici, M., Cheung, Y. W., & Lai, K. S. (2012). Trade Openness, Market Competition, and Inflation: Some Sectoral Evidence from OECD Countries. Working Papers. https://ideas.repec.org/p/tcb/wpaper/1206.html
  7. Bošnjak, M., Novak, I., & Bašić, M. (2022). Openness and Inflation Nexus: The Case of European Post-Transition Countries. FEB Zagreb 13th International Odyssey Conference on Economics and Business.
  8. Ceyhan, T., Gülcan, N., & Gürsoy, S. (2023). Analysis of the Relationship Between Trade Openness and Inflation: Evidence from MIKTA Countries. Journal of Economics Business and Political Researches, 8(21), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.25204/IKTISAD.1144240
  9. Chimobi, O. P. (2010). Causality between Money and Inflation in the Nigerian Economy. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4(1), 363–370. http://www.econ-society.org
  10. Christian, M. N. (2023). Determinants of Inflation in the Democratic Republic of Congo: An Application of ARDL Modelling. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 07(07), 251–262. https://doi.org/10.51505/ijebmr.2023.7718
  11. Çoban, M. N. (2020). Romer Hipotezi Kapsamında Ticari Dışa Açıklık ve Enflasyon İlişkisi: Next 11 Ülkeleri İçin Panel ARDL Analizi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.36362/GUMUS.647844
  12. Doğan, Ö. (2023). Enflasyon Muhasebesi ile İlgili Yasal Düzenlemelerin Finansal Raporlama Çerçeveleri Kapsamında Karşılaştırmalı Değerlendirilmesi. Malatya Turgut Özal Üniversitesi İşletme ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 190–209. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/379054785
  13. Dumitrescu, E. I., & Hurlin, C. (2012). Testing for Granger Non-causality in Heterogeneous Panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONMOD.2012.02.014
  14. Eltejaei, E., & Shoorekchali, J. M. (2021). Investigating the Relationship between Money Growth and Inflation in Türkiye: A Nonlinear Causality Approach. Journal of Money and Economy, 16(3), 305–322. https://doi.org/10.29252/jme.16.3.305
  15. Evans, R. W. (2007). Is Openness Inflationary? Imperfect Competition and Monetary Market Power. Globalization Institute Working Papers. https://ideas.repec.org/p/fip/feddgw/01.html
  16. Girdzijauskas, S., Streimikiene, D., Griesiene, I., Mikalauskiene, A., & Kyriakopoulos, G. L. (2022). New Approach to Inflation Phenomena to Ensure Sustainable Economic Growth. Sustainability, 14(1) 518. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU14010518
  17. Gokal, V., & Hanif, S. (2004). Relationship Between Inflation and Economic Growth (4).
  18. Hamidi, A., Alvin, S. P. (2022). Romer’s Hypothesis Validation and Threshold of Trade Openness in ASEAN. Buletin Ekonomika Pembangunan, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21107/BEP.V3I1.18500
  19. Kaukab, M. E., & Anggara, A. A. (2024). Does Trade Openness and Inflation Rate Have Dynamic Interconnected Patterns? An Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) Model Co-integration Approach. Journal of Economics, Finance and Management (JEFM), 3(1), 181–193. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.10702368
  20. Khan, M., & Hanif, W. (2020). Institutional Quality and The Relationship Between Inflation and Economic Growth. Empirical Economics, 58(2), 627–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00181-018-1479-7/TABLES/4
  21. Kónya, L. (2006). Exports and growth: Granger causality analysis on OECD countries with a panel data approach. Economic Modelling, 23(6), 978-992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2006.04.008
  22. Korkmaz, S. (2015). Impact of Bank Credits on Economic Growth and Inflation. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 5(1), 57–69.
  23. Lin, F., Mei, D., Wang, H., & Yao, X. (2017). Romer was Right on Openness and Inflation: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Applied Economics, 20(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1514-0326(17)30006-5
  24. Munir, M., Tufail, S., & Ahmed, M. (2023). Revisiting The Romer’s Hypothesis and Openness and Inflation Relationship for Pakistan. Gomal University Journal of Research, 39(01), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.51380/gujr-39-01-09
  25. Munir, S., & Kiani, A. K. (2011). Relationship Between Trade Openness and Inflation: Empirical Evidences from Pakistan (1976–2010). The Pakistan Development Review, 50(4), 853–876. https://ideas.repec.org/a/pid/journl/v50y2011i4p853-876.html
  26. Nasrat, M. N. (2020). The Impact of Trade Openness on Inflation: Evidence from Six South Asian Countries from 1980 to 2016. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR), 7(4), 165-178. https://www.academia.edu/42623842/Issue_4_www_jetir_org_ISSN_2349_5162
  27. Nguyen, V. M. H., Ho, T. H., Nguyen, L. H., & Pham, A. T. H. (2023). The Impact of Trade Openness on Economic Stability in Asian Countries. Sustainability, 15(11736), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU151511736
  28. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. IZA Discussion Paper, 1240, 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-020-01875-7
  29. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross-Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
  30. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621. https://doi.org/10.2307/2670182
  31. Pham, B. T., & Sala, H. (2022). Cross-country Connectedness in Inflation and Unemployment: Measurement and Macroeconomic Consequences. Empirical Economics, 62(3), 1123–1146. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00181-021-02052-0/FIGURES/7
  32. Rajagopal, Dr. (2007). Trade Openness and Economic Growth in Latin American Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.988801
  33. Rogoff, K. (2003). Globalization and Global Disinflation. Economic Review, 88(4), 45–80. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=26ff010c1822c527986543a7923986e94fa30891
  34. Romer, D. (1993). Openness and Inflation: Theory and Evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(4), 869–903. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118453
  35. Salamai, Dr. A. A., Faisal, Dr. S. M., & Khan, Dr. A. K. (2022). The Relationship Between Inflation and GDP with Reference to Oil Based Economy. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 375–380. https://doi.org/10.54660/anfo.2022.3.1.21
  36. Salimifar, M., Razmi, M. J., & Taghizadegan, Z. (2015). A Survey of The Effect of Trade Openness Size on Inflation Rate in Iran Using ARDL. Theoretical and Applied Economics, XXII(3(604), Autumn), 143–154. https://ideas.repec.org/a/agr/journl/vxxiiy2015i3(604)p143-154.html
  37. Salisu, A. A., & Isah, K. O. (2017). Revisiting the Oil Price and Stock Market Nexus: A Nonlinear Panel ARDL Approach. Economic Modelling, 66, 258–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2017.07.010
  38. Samimi, J. A., Ghaderi, S., Hosseinzadeh, R., & Nademi, Y. (2012). Openness and Inflation: New Empirical Panel Data Evidence. Economics Letters, 117(3), 573–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECONLET.2012.07.028
  39. Sepehrivand, A., & Azizi, J. (2016). The Effect of Trade Openness on Inflation in D-8 Member Countries with an Emphasis on Romer Theory. Asian Journal of Economic Modelling, 4(4), 162–167. https://doi.org/10.18488/JOURNAL.8/2016.4.4/8.4.162.167
  40. Şimşek, D., & Hepaktan, C. E. (2019). Ticari Açıklık, İstihdam ve Enflasyon İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(4), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.18026/CBAYARSOS.585776
  41. Sintos, A. (2023). Does Inflation Worsen Income Inequality? A Meta-analysis. Economic Systems, 47(4), 101146. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ECOSYS.2023.101146
  42. Terra, C. T. (1998). Openness and Inflation: A New Assessment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355398555603/2/113-2-641.PDF.GIF
  43. Uddin, I., & Rahman, K. U. (2023). Impact of Corruption, Unemployment and Inflation on Economic Growth Evidence from Developing Countries. Quality and Quantity, 57(3), 2759–2779. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01481-y
  44. Valogo, M. K., Duodu, E., Yusif, H., & Baidoo, S. T. (2023). Effect of exchange rate on inflation in the inflation targeting framework: Is the threshold level relevant? Research in Globalization, 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100119
  45. Van, D. D. (2020). Money Supply and Inflation Impact on Economic Growth. Journal of Financial Economic Policy, 12(1), 121–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFEP-10-2018-0152
  46. Warsame, Z. A., Hassan, A. M., & Hassan, A. Y. (2023). Determinants of Inflation in Somalia: An ARDL Approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 18(9), 2811–2817. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.180919
  47. Yılmaz, H. A. (2024). The Asymmetric Impacts of Economic, Social, and Political Globalization on Inflation. Journal of Economic Policy Researches, 11(1), 63–74. https://doi.org/10.26650/JEPR1349411
No Related Submission Found