Article Sidebar

Submitted
October 24, 2024
Accepted
July 13, 2025
Published
October 28, 2025
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 404 Download : 192

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose ― This study aims to evaluate the impact of Indonesia’s Non-Cash Food Assistance Program (BPNT) on household consumption and food security in Sabu Raijua, a remote region in Indonesia with limited food access.
Methods ― The Propensity Score Matching (PSM) with kernel techniques is employed to estimate the BPNT program’s effects on household expenditure, caloric intake, and food insecurity using data from 536 households in Sabu Raijua, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.
Findings ― The results indicate that the BPNT program had a limited effect on household spending, nutrition, and food security. Beneficiary households spent slightly more on food and non-food items, showed minor improvements in nutritional intake, and were less likely to face food shortages, though concerns about food adequacy persisted.
Implications ― The findings suggest that while BPNT helps alleviate food insecurity, further improvements in program implementation are needed to enhance its overall impact on household welfare.
Originality ― This research provides critical insights into the effectiveness of BPNT in a remote region with unique socioeconomic challenges that have not been subject to empirical study, highlighting the challenges and opportunities for improving non-cash food assistance programs in similar contexts.

Keywords

BPNT Food expenditure Nutrient intake Food security Remote regions

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Rizki Tri Anggara, Elsya Gumayanti Alfahma

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Economic Journal of Emerging Markets by Center for Economic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Anggara, R. T., & Alfahma, E. G. (2025). Non-cash food assistance and household food security: Evidence from remote Indonesia. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 17(2), 143–156. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol17.iss2.art3
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alderman, H., Alderman, H., Gentilini, U., & Yemtsov, R. (2017). The 1.5 Billion People Question: Food, Vouchers, or Cash Transfers? The World Bank. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1087-9
  2. Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Kyle, J., Olken, B. A., & Sumarto, S. (2019). Private outsourcing and competition: Subsidized food distribution in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 127(1), 101–137. https://doi.org/10.1086/700734 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/700734
  3. Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., & Diana Sverdlin, L. (2024). Social Protection in the Developing World. In. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4810597
  4. Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., Satriawan, E., & Sumarto, S. (2023). Electronic food vouchers: Evidence from an at-scale experiment in Indonesia. American Economic Review, 113(2), 514–547. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20210461 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20210461
  5. Barrett, C. B., Reardon, T., Swinnen, J., & Zilberman, D. (2022). Agri-food value chain revolutions in low- and middle-income countries. Journal of Economic Literature, 60(4), 1316–1377. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20201539
  6. Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x
  7. Cunha, J. M. (2014). Testing paternalism: Cash versus in-kind transfers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(2), 195–230. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.2.195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.2.195
  8. Cunha, J. M., De Giorgi, G., & Jayachandran, S. (2019). The price effects of cash versus in-kind transfers. The Review of Economic Studies, 86(1), 240–281. https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdy018
  9. Egger, D., Haushofer, J., Miguel, E., Niehaus, P., & Walker, M. (2022). General equilibrium effects of cash transfers: Experimental evidence from Kenya. Econometrica, 90(6), 2603–2643. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17945 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA17945
  10. FAO. (2020). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2020: transforming food systems for affordable healthy diets. https://openknowledge.fao.org/handle/20.500.14283/ca9692en
  11. FAO. (2021). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2021: Making Agrifood Systems More Resilient To Shocks And Stresses. https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/1e61f82a-618c-467a-a37f-545580094a1d/content
  12. Filmer, D., Friedman, J., Kandpal, E., & Onishi, J. (2023). Cash transfers, food prices, and nutrition impacts on ineligible children. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 105(2), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01061
  13. Gadenne, L., Norris, S., Singhal, M., & Sukhtankar, S. (2024). In-kind transfers as insurance. American Economic Review, 114(9), 2861–2897. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20220822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20220822
  14. Gentilini, U. (2016). Revisiting the “cash versus food” debate: New evidence for an old puzzle? The World Bank Research Observer, 31(1), 135–167. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkv012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkv012
  15. Gilligan, D. O., Hoddinott, J., & Taffesse, A. S. (2009). The impact of Ethiopia’s productive safety net programme and its linkages. Journal of Development Studies, 45(10), 1684–1706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380902935907 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380902935907
  16. Government of Indonesia. (2017). Presidential Regulation Number 63 of 2017 on the Distribution of Non-Cash Social Assistance. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/73010/perpres-no-63-tahun-2017
  17. Habimana, D., Haughton, J., Nkurunziza, J., & Haughton, D. M.-A. (2021). Measuring the impact of unconditional cash transfers on consumption and poverty in Rwanda. World Development Perspectives, 23, 100341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100341 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100341
  18. Hidrobo, M., Hoddinott, J., Peterman, A., Margolies, A., & Moreira, V. (2014). Cash, food, or vouchers? Evidence from a randomized experiment in northern Ecuador. Journal of Development Economics, 107, 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.11.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.11.009
  19. Hirvonen, K., & Hoddinott, J. (2021). Beneficiary views on cash and in-kind payments: Evidence from Ethiopia’s productive safety net programme. The World Bank Economic Review, 35(2), 398–413. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaa002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaa002
  20. Jensen, R. T., & Miller, N. H. (2011). Do consumer price subsidies really improve nutrition? Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(4), 1205–1223. https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00118
  21. Kochar, A. (2005). Can targeted food programs improve nutrition? An empirical analysis of India’s public distribution system. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 54(1), 203–235. https://doi.org/10.1086/431260 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/431260
  22. McIntosh, C., & Zeitlin, A. (2024). Cash versus kind: Benchmarking a child nutrition program against unconditional cash transfers in Rwanda. The Economic Journal, 134(664), 3360–3389. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae050
  23. Ministry of Health. (2021). Indonesian Nutritional Status Study (SSGI) Year 2021. https://www.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/buku-saku-hasil-studi-status-gizi-indonesia-ssgi-tahun-2021/
  24. Mustafa, M. N., Asfaw, F. F., Endris, A. E., & Bojago, E. (2023). Evaluating the impact of productive safety net program on rural household food security achievement: Endogenous switching regression modeling approach. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 14, 100674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100674 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafr.2023.100674
  25. National Food Agency. (2021). Food security and vulnerability atlas 2021. National Food Agency. Retrieved 26 September 2024 from https://fsva.badanpangan.go.id/
  26. Nava, N. J., Ridley, W., & Dall'erba, S. (2023). A model of the U.S. food system: What are the determinants of the state vulnerabilities to production shocks and supply chain disruptions? Agricultural Economics, 54(1), 95-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12750 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12750
  27. Nazareno, L., & De Castro Galvao, J. (2023). The impact of conditional cash transfers on poverty, inequality, and employment during Covid-19: A case study from Brazil. Population Research and Policy Review, 42(2), 22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-023-09749-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-023-09749-3
  28. O'Farrell, S., & Warokka, T. (2018). Indonesia's non-cash social assistance reform: An analysis of TNP2K's contribution. https://www.dfat.gov.au/sites/default/files/indonesias-non-cash-social-assistance-reform-an-analysis-of-tnp2ks-contribution.pdf
  29. Parker, S. W., & Todd, P. E. (2017). Conditional Cash Transfers: The Case of Progresa/Oportunidades. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 866–915. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151233 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20151233
  30. Penne, T., & Goedemé, T. (2021). Can low-income households afford a healthy diet? Insufficient income as a driver of food insecurity in Europe. Food Policy, 99, 101978. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101978 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101978
  31. Pingali, P., Mittra, B., & Rahman, A. (2017). The bumpy road from food to nutrition security – Slow evolution of India's food policy. Global Food Security, 15, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2017.05.002
  32. Rai, R. K., Kumar, S., Sekher, M., Pritchard, B., & Rammohan, A. (2015). A life-cycle approach to food and nutrition security in India. Public health nutrition, 18(5), 944-949. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014001037 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980014001037
  33. Rammohan, A., & Tohari, A. (2024). Food vouchers and dietary diversity: evidence from social protection reform in Indonesia. Food security, 16(1), 161-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01413-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-023-01413-0
  34. Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41-55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41
  35. SGP Indonesia. (2023). Sabu Raijua Islands Baseline Survey and Strategic Plan for GEF SGP Program 2022-2026. https://sgp-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Laporan-Sabu-Final-Layouted-eng.pdf
  36. Skoufias, E., Tiwari, S., & Zaman, H. (2012). Crises, food prices, and the income elasticity of micronutrients: Estimates from Indonesia. The World Bank Economic Review, 26(3), 415–442. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhr054 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhr054
  37. Skoufias, E., Unar, M., & Gonzalez De Cossio, T. (2013). The poverty impacts of cash and in-kind transfers: Experimental evidence from rural Mexico. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 5(4), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2013.843578 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19439342.2013.843578
  38. Timmer, C., Hastuti, H., & Sumarto, S. (2017). Evolution and Implementation of the Rastra Program in Indonesia. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:pra:mprapa:81018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1087-9_ch7
  39. TNP2K. (2018). The future of the social protection system in Indonesia: social protection for all. https://tnp2k.go.id/downloads/the-future-of-the-social-protection-system-in-indonesia
  40. Torres, T. d. F., Marques, M. L. V., Cezar, C. A. P., Uhr, D. de A. P., Uhr, J. G. Z., & Carraro, A. (2025). A study on the effect of the Brazilian conditional cash transfer program on child nutrition. International Journal of Social Economics. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2023-0216 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-03-2023-0216
  41. Wang, J., Ding, X., Gao, H., & Fan, S. (2022). Reshaping food policy and governance to incentivize and empower disadvantaged groups for improving nutrition. Nutrients, 14(3), 648. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030648 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu14030648
No Related Submission Found