Article Sidebar

Submitted
February 4, 2026
Accepted
March 15, 2026
Published
April 30, 2026
Download
Full text PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose — This study examines how global economic policy uncertainty (GEPU) shapes government expenditure dynamics in emerging market economies.
Methods — Using an annual panel of 28 emerging economies from 1998 to 2023, this study analyzes short-run fiscal adjustments and long-run equilibrium relationships between global uncertainty and public expenditure. To address challenges arising from mixed integration orders and cross-sectional dependence driven by global shocks, it employs a multistage empirical strategy that combines fixed-effects estimation, Driscoll–Kraay robust inference, and a cross-sectionally augmented dynamic error-correction model (ECM).
Findings — The results provide robust evidence that higher GEPU is associated with higher government expenditure as a share of Gross Domestic Product (GDP). This relationship holds across alternative specifications and persists in the long run, indicating that fiscal responses to uncertainty are not purely transitory. Dynamic estimates reveal a statistically significant error-correction mechanism, confirming a stable long-term relationship among government expenditure, global uncertainty, and domestic economic conditions. Structural factors, particularly urbanization, further shape fiscal outcomes, whereas income per capita enters with a negative sign, though its effect is not consistently statistically significant across specifications.
Implication — The findings have important implications for fiscal sustainability and policy design in an increasingly uncertain global environment.
Originality — By explicitly accounting for non-stationarity and unobserved common global factors, this study contributes to the literature by providing new evidence of how emerging market governments respond to global risks.

Keywords

Global economic policy uncertainty government expenditure emerging markets fiscal policy error-correction model

Article Details

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Ali Alsubaie

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Economic Journal of Emerging Markets by Center for Economic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite
Alsubaie, A. (2026). Global economic policy uncertainty and fiscal responses in emerging markets: A dynamic error-correction panel. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 18(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol18.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Alesina, A., Campante, F. R., & Tabellini, G. (2008). Why Is Fiscal Policy Often Procyclical? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6(5), 1006–1036. https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.1006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/JEEA.2008.6.5.1006
  2. Alesina, A., Perotti, R., Giavazzi, F., & Kollintzas, T. (1995). Fiscal Expansions and Adjustments in OECD Countries. Economic Policy, 10(21), 205. https://doi.org/10.2307/1344590 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1344590
  3. Arroyo Marioli, F., Fatas, A., & Vasishtha, G. (2024). Fiscal policy volatility and growth in emerging markets and developing economies. International Review of Economics & Finance, 92, 758–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.01.041 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2024.01.041
  4. Baker, S. R., Bloom, N., & Davis, S. J. (2016). Measuring Economic Policy Uncertainty*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 131(4), 1593–1636. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjw024
  5. Bernanke, B. S. (1983). Irreversibility, Uncertainty, and Cyclical Investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885568 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1885568
  6. Bloom, N. (2009). The Impact of Uncertainty Shocks. Econometrica, 77(3), 623–685. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6248 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA6248
  7. Bloom, N., Bond, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Uncertainty and Investment Dynamics. Review of Economic Studies, 74(2), 391–415. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00426.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00426.x
  8. Born, B., & Pfeifer, J. (2014). Policy risk and the business cycle. Journal of Monetary Economics, 68, 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.07.012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.07.012
  9. Caggiano, G., Castelnuovo, E., & Groshenny, N. (2014). Uncertainty shocks and unemployment dynamics in U.S. recessions. Journal of Monetary Economics, 67, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.07.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2014.07.006
  10. Caldara, D., Iacoviello, M., Molligo, P., Prestipino, A., & Raffo, A. (2020). The economic effects of trade policy uncertainty. Journal of Monetary Economics, 109, 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2019.11.002
  11. Chudik, A., & Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188(2), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2015.03.007
  12. Debrun, X., Moulin, L., Turrini, A., Ayuso-i-Casals, J., & Kumar, M. S. (2008). Tied to the mast? National fiscal rules in the European Union. Economic Policy, 23(54), 297–362. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2008.00199.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2008.00199.x
  13. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  14. Eichengreen, B., Gupta, P., & Mody, A. (2008). Sudden Stops and IMF-Supported Programs. In Financial Markets Volatility and Performance in Emerging Markets (pp. 219–264). University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226185040.003.0008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226185040.003.0008
  15. Fernández-Villaverde, J., Guerrón-Quintana, P., Kuester, K., & Rubio-Ramírez, J. (2015). Fiscal Volatility Shocks and Economic Activity. American Economic Review, 105(11), 3352–3384. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20121236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20121236
  16. Frankel, J. A., Vegh, C. A., & Vuletin, G. (2013). On graduation from fiscal procyclicality. Journal of Development Economics, 100(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.07.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2012.07.001
  17. Gavin, M., & Perotti, R. (1997). Fiscal Policy in Latin America. NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 12, 11–61. https://doi.org/10.1086/654320 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/654320
  18. Gulen, H., & Ion, M. (2015). Policy Uncertainty and Corporate Investment. Review of Financial Studies, hhv050. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhv050
  19. Ilzetzki, E., Mendoza, E. G., & Végh, C. A. (2013). How big (small?) are fiscal multipliers? Journal of Monetary Economics, 60(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2012.10.011
  20. Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., & Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  21. Julio, B., & Yook, Y. (2012). Political Uncertainty and Corporate Investment Cycles. The Journal of Finance, 67(1), 45–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01707.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2011.01707.x
  22. Jurado, K., Ludvigson, S. C., & Ng, S. (2015). Measuring Uncertainty. American Economic Review, 105(3), 1177–1216. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131193 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20131193
  23. Mumtaz, H., & Ruch, F. U. (2025). Policy Uncertainty and Aggregate Fluctuations: Evidence from Emerging and Developed Economies. The World Bank Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaf023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/lhaf023
  24. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in Dynamic Models with Fixed Effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417. https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1911408
  25. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504
  26. Pesaran, M. H. (2006). Estimation and Inference in Large Heterogeneous Panels with a Multifactor Error Structure. Econometrica, 74(4), 967–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00692.x
  27. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. P. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(446), 621–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1999.10474156
  28. Ramey, V. A. (2011). Identifying Government Spending Shocks: It’s all in the Timing*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(1), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjq008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjq008
  29. Rodrik, D. (1998). Why do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments? Journal of Political Economy, 106(5), 997–1032. https://doi.org/10.1086/250038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/250038
  30. Svirydzenka, K. (2016). Introducing a New Broad-based Index of Financial Development. IMF Working Papers, 16(05), 1. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513583709.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5089/9781513583709.001
  31. Talvi, E., & Végh, C. A. (2005). Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(1), 156–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.07.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2004.07.002
  32. Woo, J. (2009). Why Do More Polarized Countries Run More Procyclical Fiscal Policy? Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(4), 850–870. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.4.850 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.4.850
No Related Submission Found