Article Sidebar

Submitted
August 9, 2017
Accepted
August 13, 2017
Published
March 8, 2018
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 670 Download : 689

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Main Article Content

Abstract

This study estimates the efficiency of employees’ performances under profit
sharing system using data envelopment analysis (DEA). This method is one of the
most common methods used in efficiency measurement analysis. However, a
robust approach is used to deal with the complexity of the traditional DEA
estimators. Robust Data Envelopment Analysis (RDEA) is very useful when
outliers contaminate the data. The sample includes five divisions which cover as
many as 102 employees of a shipping company in Malaysia are analyzed by using
R program. The results reveal that the initial DEA efficiency is an over-estimate of
the true efficiency. RDEA provides better accuracy of the results. Further, the
robust approach is appropriate to be used in the measurement of the efficiency of
company divisions under profit sharing program.

Keywords

DEA DMUs profit sharing robust shipping

Article Details

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).

Creative Commons License

Economic Journal of Emerging Markets by Center for Economic Studies, Universitas Islam Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biographies

Umi Mahmudah, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Trengganu

School of Informatics and Applied Mathematics

Muhamad Safiih Lola, Universiti Malaysia Terengganu, Trengganu

School of Informatics and Applied Mathematics
How to Cite
Mahmudah, U., & Lola, M. S. (2018). Robust approach for efficiency measurement of employee performance under profit sharing system. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol10.iss1.art1
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX

References

  1. Banker, R.D., Charnes A., & Cooper W.W., (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 3 (9), 1078-1092.
  2. Bertsimas, D., & Sim, M. (2003). Robust discrete optimization and network flows. MathematicalProgramming, 98(1), 49-71
  3. Bhargava, S., & Jenkinson, T. (1995). Explicit versus implicit profit-sharing and the determination of wages: microeconomic evidence from the U.K. Labour, 9, 73-95.
  4. Blasi, J. (2013). The evidence on employee stock ownership and profit sharing: The citizen’s share. Forthcoming from Yale University Press in August of 2013.
  5. Cahuc, P., & Dormont, B. (1997). Profit Sharing: Does It Increase Productivity and Employment? A theoretical model and empirical evidence on French micro data. Labour Economics, 4, 293-319.
  6. Charnes A., Cooper W.W., & Rhodes E., (1978). Measuring the inefficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429-444.
  7. Coelli, T., Rao, D., & Battese, G. (1994). an introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  8. Cooper, W.W., Z.M. Huang, V. Lelas, S. Xi & O.B. Olesen .(1998). Chance Constrained Programming Formulations for Stochastic Characterizations of Efficiency and Dominance in DEA. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9 (1), 53-79.
  9. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
  10. Estrin, S., Perotin, V., Robinson, A., & Wilson, N. (1997). Profit sharing in OECD countries: a review and some evidence. Business Strategy Review, 8, 27-32.
  11. Farrell, M.J. (1957). The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series, 120(3), 253-290.
  12. Gharakhan, M., Kazemi, I., & Haji, H.A. (2011). A robust DEA model for measuring the relative efficiency of Iranian high schools. Management Science Letters, 1, 389-404.
  13. Golec, A., & Kahya, E. (2007). A Fuzzy model for competency-based employee evaluation and selection. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 52, 143-161.
  14. Gstach, D. (1998). Another Approach to Data Envelopment Analysis in Noisy Environments: DEA+. Journal of Productivity Analysis 9 (2), 161-176.
  15. Hainaut, D. (2009). Profit sharing: A stochastic control approach. ESC Rennes 35065 Rennes, Frances.
  16. Jerger, J., & Michaelis, J. (2007). To share or not to share? why profit sharing is so hard to implement?. Economic Letters, 110(2), 104-106.
  17. Koskela, E., & J. König .(2010). Can profit sharing lower flexible outsourcing?. HECER Discussion Paper No. 310.
  18. Kraft, K., & Ugarkovic, M. (2005). Profit sharing and the financial performance of firms: Evidence from Germany. Economic Letters, 92, 333-338.
  19. Kruse, D. (1992). Profit Sharing and productivity: Microeconomic evidence from the United States. The Economic Journal, 102 (410), 24-36.
  20. OECD. (1995). Profit sharing in OECD countries. Employment Outlook, 139-169.
  21. Perotin, V., & Robinson, A. (2002). Employee participation in profit and ownership: a review of the issues and evidence. Paper prepared for the European Parliament. Leeds University Business School, UK.
  22. Shirouyehzad, H., Lotfi, F.H., Aryanezhad, M.B., Reza, D. (2012). A Data Envelopment Analysis approach for measuring efficiency of employees: a case study. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 23(1), 191-210.
  23. Simar, L., Wilson, P.W. (1998). Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models. Management Science, 44, 49-61.
  24. Simar, L., Wilson, P.W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31-64.
  25. Tao, G. (2012). Multi-department employee performance evaluation based on DEA cross efficiency. Journal of emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3(5), 553-558.
  26. Testi, A., Fareed, N., Ozcan, Y., & Tanfani, E. . (2013). Assessment of Physician Performance Diabetes: a Bias-corrected Data envelopment Analysis Model. Quality in Primary Care, 21, 345-257.
  27. Thanassoulis E., Dyson, R.G., & Foster, M.J. (1987). Relative efficiency assessments using data envelopment analysis: an application to data on rates departments. Journal of Operational Research, 38, 397-412.
  28. Wadhwani, S., & Wall, M. (1990). The effects of profit sharing on employment, wages, stock returns and productivity: Evidence from UK micro-data. Economic Journal, 100(399), 1-17.
  29. Wilson, P. (1995). Detecting Influential Observations in Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of Productivity Analysis 6, 27 – 45.
  30. Wu, Y.-J., & Hou, J.-L. (2010). An employee performance estimation model for the logistic industry. Decision Support Systems, 48, 568-581.
  31. Zbranek, P. (2013). Data Envelopment Analysis as a tool for evaluation of employees’ performance. Acta Economica et Informatica, 26(1), 12-21
No Related Submission Found