Main Article Content


Employee performance is critical to the overall success of the company. In achieving their goals, companies will face many challenges. This can be overcome in several ways, one of which is by improving employee performance. Therefore, it is important to measure the role performance of employee in Indonesia. Work role performance scale was first delevoped in Australia in 2007 and have not been adapted for Indonesian population. This study intends to evaluate the validity and the reliability of the Indonesian version of work role performance scale. Aiken’s V formula was used to evaluate the content validity of the scale. Both CTT and Rasch analysis were employed to evaluate the reliability of the scale. Participants in this study were employees, with a total of 370 (n = 370), collected by using accidental sampling techniques. The results showed Aiken’s V of 0.87 to 0.91 shows that items of the adapted scale were relevant to measure the construct. The adapted scale was found reliable with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.936 and Rasch’s person and item reliability were 0.87 and 0.98. In CFA results, the model fit was acceptable (RMSEA=0.08 and CFI=0.96) shows that the data fit the hypoteshized model.

Article Details


  1. Aiken, L. R. (1985). Psychological Testing and Assessment (5th ed.). Allyn and Bacon Inc.
  2. Azwar, S. (1999). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Sigma Alpha.
  3. Azwar, S. (2015). Dasar-Dasar Psikometrika (2nd ed.). Pustaka Belajar.
  4. Azwar, S. (2016). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi (2nd ed.). Pustaka Belajar.
  5. Fulmer, L. ., & Ployhart, R. . (2013). Out Most Important Asset. Journal of Management.
  6. Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: Positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327–347.
  7. Hair Jr, J. F., Babin, B. J., Black, W. C., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
  8. ITC. (2017). ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (Second Edition). International Journal of Testing, 18(2), 101–134.
  9. Jundt, D. ., Shoss, M. ., & Huang, J. . (2014). Individual adaptive performance in organization: A Review. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology.
  10. Kaplan, R. M., & Saccuzo. (2005). Psychological Testing: Principles, Application, and Issues (6th ed.). Thompson Wadsworth.
  11. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organization Behavior (2nd Editio). Wiley.
  12. Murphy, P., & Jackson, S. (1999). Managing work-role performance: Challenges for 21st century organization and employees. In D. R. Ilgen & E.D. Pulakos (Eds). The Changing Nature of Work Performance, 325–365.
  13. Priyono. (2010). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. Zifatama Publisher.
  14. Shmailan, A. (2016). The relationship between job satisfaction, job performance and employee engagement: An explorative study. Issues in Business Management and Economics, 4(1), 1–8.
  15. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D (24th ed.). Alfabeta.
  16. Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial (Revisi). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
  17. Tanaka, J. . (1993). Multifaceted conceptions of fit in structural models. Testing Structural Equation Models, 10–40.
  18. Umar, J. (2012). Peran Pengukuran dan Analisis Stasitisik dalam Penelitian Psikologi. JP3I (Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia), I(1).
  19. Umar, J., & Nisa, Y. F. (2020). Uji validitas konstruk dengan CFA dan pelaporannya. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 1–11.
  20. Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. . (2000). Perspective on Model of Job Performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8, 216–226.