Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: Generation Z faces an unprecedented mental health paradox: despite high digital connectivity, they report record levels of stress and declining subjective well-being (SWB). While the link between SWB and stress reduction is well-documented, the social moderators that facilitate this relationship remain under-explored. This study examines the moderating role of trust in the SWB-stress nexus among 267 undergraduate digital natives. Using moderation regression analysis, we demonstrate that trust serves as a critical protective amplifier. Our findings reveal that higher levels of trust significantly enhance the efficacy of SWB in mitigating stress, whereas low trust diminishes this protective effect. This suggests that interpersonal reliability is a prerequisite for psychological resilience in Gen Z. These results advocate for a shift in mental health interventions from purely individualistic self-care to the cultivation of social cohesion and trust-building within educational and social institutions
Keywords: generation z, stress, subjective well being, trust
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2026 Ainurizan Ridho Rahmatulloh, Martaria Rizky Rinaldi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).