Main Article Content
Abstract
Abstract: Climate change is the defining existential crisis of the 21st century, posing a unique psychological burden on Generation Z. While emotion regulation (ER) typically buffers against clinical anxiety, its role in the context of global environmental threats remains contested. This study examines the relationship between ER and climate anxiety among Gen Z (N = 411), investigating gender as a potential moderator. Contrary to established psychological paradigms where regulation reduces distress, our results reveal that higher emotion regulation significantly amplifies climate change anxiety. This suggests that in the face of systemic environmental collapse, "effective" regulation does not function as a sedative; instead, it may heighten emotional proximity and sensitivity to ecological threats. Furthermore, gender significantly moderates this relationship, indicating distinct pathways of emotional processing between groups. These findings challenge the traditional definition of "adaptive" regulation, suggesting that for Gen Z, climate anxiety may be a rational, regulated response rather than a pathology. We propose a shift in psychological interventions from symptom reduction to "distress integration" for climate resilience.
Keywords: Climate Anxiety, Gen Z, Regulation Emotion
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2026 Anndiny Anastasya Handayani, Siti Jaroah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).