Article Sidebar

Submitted
September 26, 2025
Accepted
December 31, 2025
Published
December 31, 2025
Download
pdf (Bahasa Indonesia)
Statistic
Read Counter : 16 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengevaluasi efektivitas model pembelajaran inovatif, yaitu Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT) berbasis kecerdasan buatan dengan pendekatan Taksonomi Bloom, Problem-Based Learning (PBL) melalui kunjungan industri, dan Project-Based Learning (PBL) dengan metode Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), dalam meningkatkan capaian pembelajaran mata kuliah Pengendalian dan Penjaminan Mutu di Program Studi Teknik Industri. Metode yang digunakan adalah classroom action research dengan instrumen berupa pre-test dan post-test berbasis CAT-AI, observasi pada kegiatan kunjungan industri, serta evaluasi proyek FMEA. Data dikumpulkan dari hasil tes, laporan proyek, presentasi, refleksi mahasiswa, dan kuesioner kepuasan, kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif kuantitatif dan kualitatif untuk menilai ketercapaian CPMK, kepuasan mahasiswa, dan efektivitas metode pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya peningkatan signifikan pada pemahaman mahasiswa. Pada CAT-AI, persentase jawaban benar meningkat dari 53,8% menjadi 100% pada CPMK 1, serta dari 66,7% menjadi 94,3% pada CPMK 2. Melalui kunjungan industri, mahasiswa mampu mengidentifikasi masalah mutu, menganalisis penerapan TQM, ISO 9001, dan QC tools, serta merumuskan solusi praktis sesuai konteks lapangan. Pada proyek berbasis FMEA, mahasiswa berhasil menyusun analisis risiko, laporan, presentasi, dan video publikasi yang memperluas dampak pembelajaran, sekaligus mengasah keterampilan abad 21 seperti kolaborasi, komunikasi, kreativitas, dan pemecahan masalah. Evaluasi capaian CPMK menunjukkan ketercapaian 100% untuk CPMK 1 dan 2, serta peningkatan dari baseline 96% menjadi 100% pada CPMK 3. Tingkat kepuasan mahasiswa mencapai 90,5%, sedikit di bawah target yang ditetapkan. Penelitian ini memiliki keterbatasan karena hanya diterapkan pada satu mata kuliah dan satu periode akademik sehingga hasilnya belum dapat digeneralisasikan secara luas. Oleh karena itu, penelitian lanjutan dengan cakupan lebih besar, integrasi lintas mata kuliah, dan pemanfaatan platform digital interaktif direkomendasikan untuk meningkatkan pengalaman belajar mahasiswa. Secara praktis, integrasi CAT-AI, PBL-Industrial Visit, dan PBL-FMEA terbukti mampu meningkatkan penguasaan konsep, keterampilan teknis, serta kemampuan analitis mahasiswa, sehingga dapat menjadi model pembelajaran inovatif yang relevan dengan kebutuhan dunia industri.

Keywords

Computerized adaptive testing FMEA pembelajaran berbasis masalah pembelajaran berbasis proyek pengendalian mutu

Article Details

References

  1. Abu-Ghuwaleh, M., & Saffaf, R. (2023). Integrating AI and NLP with project-based learning in STREAM education. Computer Science and Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202306.0848.v1
  2. Akavova, A., Temirkhanova, Z., & Lorsanova, Z. (2023). Adaptive learning and artificial intelligence in the educational space. E3S Web of Conferences, 451, 06011. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202345106011
  3. Amarullah, A. K., & Rachmawaty, N. (2020). Exploring students’ experience in project-based drama learning and their perception of speaking anxiety. In Proceedings of the 2nd Educational Sciences International Conference (ESIC 2019). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200417.009
  4. Amhag, L. (2013). Creativity in and between collaborative peer assessment processes in higher distance education. Creative Education, 4(7), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.47A2011
  5. Brouwer, J., Flache, A., Jansen, E., Hofman, A., & Steglich, C. (2018). Emergent achievement segregation in freshmen learning community networks. Higher Education, 76(3), 483–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0221-2
  6. Car, L. T., Kyaw, B. M., Dunleavy, G., Smart, N. A., Semwal, M., Rotgans, J. I., Low-Beer, N., & Campbell, J. (2019). Digital problem-based learning in health professions: Systematic review and meta-analysis by the digital health education collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(2), e12945. https://doi.org/10.2196/12945
  7. Dewi, M. R. (2022). Kelebihan dan kekurangan project-based learning untuk penguatan profil pelajar Pancasila kurikulum merdeka. Inovasi Kurikulum, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v19i2.44226
  8. Elwarraki, O., Aammou, S., & Lahiassi, J. (2023). Teachers as facilitators: Exploring the role of educators in personalized learning environments in Moroccan schools. Conhecimento & Diversidade, 15(39), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.18316/rcd.v15i39.11161
  9. Fadhillah, N., Sudjarwo, S., & Habsari, D. (2023). Students’ perception of project-based learning in writing class. International Journal of Education and Digital Learning (IJEDL), 1(3), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.47353/ijedl.v1i3.12
  10. Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  11. Grierson, L. E. M., Barry, M., Kapralos, B., Carnahan, H., & Dubrowski, A. (2012). The role of collaborative interactivity in the observational practice of clinical skills. Medical Education, 46(4), 409–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04196.x
  12. Hart, J. L. (2019). Interdisciplinary project-based learning as a means of developing employability skills in undergraduate science degree programs. Journal of Teaching and Learning for Graduate Employability, 10(2), 50–66. https://doi.org/10.21153/jtlge2019vol10no2art827
  13. Hasumi, T., & Chiu, M.-S. (2022). Online mathematics education as bio-eco-techno process: Bibliometric analysis using co-authorship and bibliographic coupling. Scientometrics, 127(8), 4631–4654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04441-3
  14. Johnson, M., & Griffin, A. (2024). Student experiences of online problem-based learning in an interdisciplinary dietetic and engineering environment. Journal of Experiential Education, 47(3), 424–442. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538259231193100
  15. Kamaruddin, I., Sari, M. N., Papia, J. N. T., M. Usman, P., Andriani, N., & Kesek, M. N. (2024). Implementasi metode pembelajaran berbasis proyek dalam pendidikan tinggi untuk memfasilitasi pemecahan masalah multidisiplin. Journal on Education, 6(4), 19620–19630. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i4.5990
  16. Kamaruddin, I., Suarni, E., Rambe, S., Sakti, B. P. S., Rachman, R. S., & Kurniadi, P. (2023). Penerapan model pembelajaran berbasis proyek dalam pendidikan: Tinjauan literatur. Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP), 6(4), 2742–2747. https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v6i4.22138
  17. Kırkgöz, Y., & Turhan, B. (2021). Views of Turkish EFL teacher trainees toward technology-integrated PBL practices. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 4(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v4i1.3748
  18. Kurniawati. (2021). Competence and perceived benefits in project-based learning for postgraduate students in history education. JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 23(3), 307–320. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v23i3.23926
  19. Lerchenfeldt, S., Mi, M., & Eng, M. (2019). The utilization of peer feedback during collaborative learning in undergraduate medical education: A systematic review. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 321. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1755-z
  20. Ma, X., Tian, S., Luo, S., & Jiang, X. (2023). Research on the causes and correction strategies of group peer assessment performance bias in online collaboration. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(7), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.117005
  21. Maulany, L. E., Neviyarni, & Nirwana, H. (2022). Teori belajar populer (project-based learning, quantum learning, self-directed learning, contextual learning). Eductum: Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.56480/eductum.v1i2.747
  22. Maulidia, A. P., Indrawati, I., & Rusdianto, R. (2023). Pengaruh model project-based learning (PJBL) terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMP pada materi pemanasan global. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 12(4). https://doi.org/10.19184/jpf.v12i4.43637
  23. Mittelstadt, B. (2019). Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(11), 501–507. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0114-4
  24. Munawaroh, M., Setyani, N. S., & Susilowati, L. (2022). The effect of PBL model with technology-based learning and motivation on students’ entrepreneurial attitude. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Education and Technology (ICETECH 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220103.007
  25. Nurudin, M., Suharto, T., Bakri, S., & Makruf, I. (2023). Development of collaborative peer-based authentic assessment in physics learning. Scaffolding: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam dan Multikulturalisme, 5(1), 900–918. https://doi.org/10.37680/scaffolding.v5i1.2862
  26. Omar, S. N. P., Shahrill, M., & Sajali, M. Z. (2018). The use of peer assessment to improve students’ learning of geometry. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 5(2), 203–222. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v5i2.p203-222
  27. Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
  28. Roberts, C., Jorm, C., Gentilcore, S., & Crossley, J. (2017). Peer assessment of professional behaviours in problem-based learning groups. Medical Education, 51(4), 390–400. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13151
  29. Sangheethaa, S., & Korath, A. (2024). Impact of AI in education through a teacher’s perspective. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice. https://doi.org/10.53555/kuey.v30i4.1349
  30. Songkai, W. (2024). Research on learning social networks and collaboration in education using big data analytics and machine learning. Industry Science and Engineering, 1(3), 58–69.
  31. Stenberg, M., & Carlson, E. (2015). Swedish student nurses’ perception of peer learning as an educational model during clinical practice in a hospital setting: An evaluation study. BMC Nursing, 14(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-015-0098-2
  32. Sudatha, I. G. W., & Agung, A. A. G. (2021). Implementation of project-based e-learning in courses description statistics during COVID-19. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Innovative Research Across Disciplines (ICIRAD 2021). https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211222.024
  33. Sugeng, B. (2024). Pembelajaran abad 21: Contoh rancangan & penerapan problem-based learning di perguruan tinggi. Deepublish.
  34. Williamson, E. (2023). The effectiveness of project-based learning in developing critical thinking skills among high school students. European Journal of Education, 1(1), 1–11.
  35. Zeng, E., Long, Y., Wang, X., Xiao, Y., & Feng, Y. (2025). Literature review: Personalized learning recommendation system in educational scenarios: XAI-driven student behavior understanding and teacher collaboration mechanism. Frontiers in Interdisciplinary Applied Science, 2(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.71465/fias.v2i01.17
  36. Zhao, C. (2024). Application and prospect of artificial intelligence in personalized learning. Journal of Innovation and Development, 8(3), 24–27. https://doi.org/10.54097/nzxx6z36