Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 24, 2021
Accepted
October 23, 2023
Published
November 30, 2023
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 109 Download : 93

Main Article Content

Abstract

Higher competition makes Indonesian SMEs continue to improve their competitiveness, as it became the biggest driver of the national economy. The limitations of SMEs in the process of meeting customer demands are a major problem so that the risk of process failure accepted by SMEs is quite large. Therefore, this study aims to reduce the level of risk failure in SMEs to be able to increase success in meeting customer demand. The UKM used as a case study in this research is CV.Z, which is engaged in the fashion sector with made to order system. To reduce risk, the risk management process adopted adopts the approach of ISO 31000 as an international risk management standard. In the process of assessing the magnitude of the risk, the Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) technique was used in this study. The result is that as many as 38 failure modes were identified in the production process, with the highest Risk Priority Number (RPN) value 162. Corrective action was taken in the largest RPN failure mode by applying new methods and providing training to workers. It is expected that implementing corrective actions can reduce the failure rate in the process in SMEs.

Keywords

ISO 31000 Failure Mode Effect Analysis (FMEA) Risk Priority Number (RPN) Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Author Biography

Syarifah Muthmainnah, Universitas Islam Indonesia

Magister Teknik Industri, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta

References

  1. Anton, S. A., Muzakan, I., Muhammad, W. F., Sudin, S.-, & Sidiq, N. P. (2015). An Assessment of SME Competitiveness in Indonesia. Journal of Competitiveness, 7(2), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2015.02.04

  2. Bajo, J., Borrajo, M. L., De Paz, J. F., Corchado, J. M., & Pellicer, M. A. (2012). A multi-agent system for web-based risk management in small and medium business. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(8), 6921–6931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.01.001

  3. Brustbauer, J. (2014). Enterprise risk management in SMEs: Towards a structural model. International Small Business Journal, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614542853

  4. Cabanes, B., Hubac, S., Le Masson, P., & Weil, B. (2016). From FMEA as a problem solving method to a design-oriented process: Toward a design perspective of FMEA. Proceedings of International Design Conference, DESIGN, DS 84, 589–600.

  5. Doshi, J., & Desai, D. (2017). Application of failure mode & effect analysis (FMEA) for continuous quality improvement - multiple case studies in automobile SMEs. International Journal for Quality Research, 11(2), 345–360. https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR11.02-07

  6. Enis Bulak, M., & Turkyilmaz, A. (2014). Performance assessment of manufacturing SMEs: a frontier approach. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(5), 797–816. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-11-2013-0475

  7. Ferreira de Araújo Lima, P., Crema, M., & Verbano, C. (2020). Risk management in SMEs: A systematic literature review and future directions. European Management Journal, 38(1), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.06.005

  8. He, C., & Lu, K. (2018). Risk management in smes with financial and non- financial indicators using business intelligence methods. Management, Knowledge and Learning International Conference.

  9. ISO. (2009). International Standard Risk Management - Principles and guidelines ISO 31000.

  10. Li, S., & Zeng, W. (2014). Risk analysis for the supplier selection problem using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA). International Journal of Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-014-0953-0

  11. Liu, H. C., Liu, L., Bian, Q. H., Lin, Q. L., Dong, N., & Xu, P. C. (2011). Failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy evidential reasoning approach and grey theory. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 4403–4415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.110

  12. Mateescu, R. M., Dinu, V., & Maftei, M. (2019). Risk Management Methods: FMEA and its Influence on Risk Handling Costs. Studies in Computational Intelligence, 183–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-26172-6_11

  13. McDermott, R. E., Mikulak, R. J., & Beauregard, M. R. (2009). The Basics of FMEA (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (ed.)). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

  14. Nunhes, T. V., Motta Barbosa, L. C. F., & de Oliveira, O. J. (2017). Identification and analysis of the elements and functions integrable in integrated management systems. In Journal of Cleaner Production (Vol. 142, pp. 3225–3235). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.147

  15. Proenca, D., Estevens, J., Vieira, R., & Borbinha, J. (2017). Risk Management: A Maturity Model Based on ISO 31000. 2017 IEEE 19th Conference on Business Informatics (CBI), 1, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2017.40

  16. Silva, M. M., De Gusmão, A. P. H., Poleto, T., Silva, L. C. E., & Costa, A. P. C. S. (2014). A multidimensional approach to information security risk management using FMEA and fuzzy theory. International Journal of Information Management, 34(6), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.07.005