Article Sidebar

Submitted
July 31, 2023
Accepted
August 31, 2023
Published
September 1, 2023
Download
Pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 62 Download : 90

Main Article Content

Abstract

The mediation process was initially carried out outside the court institution (non-litigation) for the parties to the dispute, but with the times and changes in behavior, a mediation process was made in court that was inseparable from the court institution (litigation). The mediation process is an obligation that must be carried out by the judge before carrying out the next trial. If you look at PERMA No. 1 of 2016, there are many advantages why mediation is used in court. The purpose of this study is to understand the problems faced in virtual mediation at the Ujung Tanjung Religious Court and describe the efforts made by law enforcement of the Ujung Tanjung Religious Court in handling virtual mediation problems in terms of the effectiveness of Soerjono Soekanto. qualitative approach. The conclusion of this study is that the low success of the community itself is that not all parties in this case use the services of advocates, and the average level of education of the parties is low. The Ujung Tanjung Religious Court in carrying out its duties and functions has carried out a mediation process based on PERMA No.1 of 2016, the results of the litigants in conducting the mediation process are still low and the parties' strong desire to divorce. The Ujung Tanjung Religious Court has made efforts to resolve the issue, but it still requires awareness and responsibility. The online mediation process itself if referring to the Supreme Court Rules, the process can be done using audio-visual media such as video calls that are already available in many applications. In other words, the role or function of this paper is expected to be able to be a social construction to find the level of effectiveness of mediation in divorce cases in religious courts.

Keywords

Mediation Virtual Divorce Religious Court

Article Details

License
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  • Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  • Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

References

  1. Abbas, Syahrizal. 2011. “Mediasi Dalam Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat, dan Hukum Nasional”, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2011), 24.
  2. Abdul Shomad. 2012. “Hukum Islam: Normalisasi Syari’ah Prinsip-Prinsip Dalam Hukum Indonesia”, (Jakarta: Kencana), 304.
  3. Amir Syarifuddin. 2003. Hukum Perkawinan Islam di Indonesia, (Bogor: Kencana), 190.
  4. Burhan, Ashshofa. 2007. Metode Penelitian Hukum. (Jakarta: Rinneka Cipta), 58.
  5. Dewan Redaksi Islamic Encyclopedia. 2001, Ensiklopedi Islam Jilid 5, (Jakarta: Rumah Pertanian Baru Ichtiar), 53.
  6. Direktorat Jenderal Kelembagaan Keagamaan Islam, 1985. Ilmu Tentang Fiqh Jilid II, (Jakarta: Departemen Agama), 49.
  7. Emna, 2022, panmud Gugatan.
  8. Hermanto, dkk, 2021, “Peran dan Kedudukan Mediasi dalam Peradilan Agama”, Jurnal Syasi (Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara), Vol. 1 No. 2.
  9. Harahap, Yahya, 2008, Prosedur Perdata Hukum, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika), 229.
  10. Irwansyah. 2022. “Irwansyah (Hakim Mediator), Wawancara.”
  11. Kesek, Sastiono. 2015. “Studi Banding Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Melalui Mediasi dan Konsiliasi.” Universitas Tujuh Belas, Fakultas Hukum, h. 131.
  12. Mardani, 2017, Hukum Keluarga Islam dalam Indonesia, (Jakarta: Kencana), 147.
  13. Mardhiyyah. 2022. “Mardhiyyah (Hakim), Wawancara.”
  14. Mukhlis, Sihabuddin. 2020. “‘Peran Mediasi Dalam Rekonsiliasi Rumah Tangga dari Perspektif Gender’,” 14 (2).
  15. Mustika, Dian. 2015. “Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Jambi.” Al-Risalah 15 (2): 297–308.
  16. Perma Nomor 1 Tahun. 2016. Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tata Cara Mediasi.
  17. Rachmadi, Usman. 2003.” Opsi Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan”. (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti), 79.
  18. Republik. Indonesia, 2009. “Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 Tentang Peradilan Agama,” August, No. 12, 42.
  19. Ujung Tanjung, 2021, “Monografi Kepenghuluan Ujung Tanjung.”
  20. Sugiyono, 2017, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, (Bandung: Alfabeta), 109.
  21. Wahtu Sururie, Ramdani. n.d. 2019. “Pelaksanaan Mediasi dalam Sistem Peradilan Agama.” Ijtihad, Vol. 2, 12.
  22. Zuhaili, Wahbah. 2010. Fiqh Imam Syafi’I Meneliti Fiqhiyah Soal Berdasarkan Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis 2. (Jakarta: Almahira), 31.