Main Article Content

Abstract

This study aims to identify, classify, and systematically analyze various problems in the utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Islamic education in Indonesia, as well as to formulate preventive and remedial solutions. The study employs a qualitative approach with a combined design, using the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method based on PRISMA guidelines, integrated with a narrative-conceptual literature study. Data were obtained from 14 field research articles indexed in Scholar, Sinta, and Scopus within the 2020–2026 period, and were analyzed using content analysis techniques and issue trees. The findings indicate that the primary problems lie in two domains: cognitive-affective psychological impacts and violations of academic ethics and privacy. In the cognitive-affective aspect, the study identifies symptoms such as bias in religious understanding, a decline in critical thinking skills, a tendency to accept AI-generated outputs dogmatically, and the weakening of pedagogical-spiritual relationships between teachers and students. In the ethical domain, issues include AI-assisted plagiarism and the misuse of deepfake technology in religious content. The contributing factors include the epistemic limitations of AI systems, the lack of comprehensive regulation, academic pressure, and increasing user dependency. This study recommends an epistemological reconstruction based on maqasid al-shari‘ah, positioning AI as a supporting instrument (wasilah), supported by pentahelix synergy and the implementation of the ADDIE instructional design model, so that AI integration can be carried out ethically, accountably, and in alignment with the objectives of Islamic education.

Keywords

Problematic Artificial Intelligence Islamic Education SLR Indonesia

Article Details

References

  1. Afrita, J. (2023). Peran Artificial Intelligence dalam Meningkatkan Efisiensi dan Efektifitas Sistem Pendidikan. COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(12), 3181–3187. https://doi.org/10.59141/comserva.v2i12.731
  2. Ali, N., Hayati, M., Faiza, R., & Khaerah, A. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) dalam Pendidikan Islam: Trends, Persepsi dan Potensi Pelanggaran Akademik di Kalangan Mahasiswa. INJIRE: Indonesian Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 1(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.63243/1sgbam44
  3. Asmara, A. Y., Annur, F., & Azizah, N. (2025). Rekonstruksi Pendidikan Islam dalam Membingkai Pendidikan Karakter dan Dominasi Artificial Intelligence. MA’ALIM: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 6(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.21154/maalim.v6i1.11014
  4. Auda, J. (2008). Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law. The International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). https://iiit.org/en/publications/ view/maqasid-al-shariah-as-philosophy-of-islamic-law/
  5. Branch, R. M. (2009). The Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. Springer Science & Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/98-0-387-09506-6
  6. Danial, E., & Warsiah, N. (2009). Metode Penulisan Karya Ilmiah. Laboratorium Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan UPI.
  7. Dewantara, B. A., & Dewi, L. K. (2025). Generative AI dalam Pembelajaran Mahasiswa : Antara Inovasi Pendidikan dan Integritas Akademik. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(7), 8209–8217. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i7.8680
  8. Falah, M. H., & Achfama, D. N. (2026). Ethical Artificial Intelligence in Education : Aligning Technological Innovation with Islamic Principles. Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan Dan Sosial Humaniora, 3(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v3i1.1539
  9. Habib, Z. (2025). Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Maqāṣid Al- Sharīʿa ’ s Perspective. Karsa: Journal of Social and Islamic Culture, 33(1), 105–134. https://doi.org/10.19105/karsa.v33i1.19617
  10. Hakim, F., Fadlillah, A., & Rofiq, M. N. (2024). Artificial Intellegence Pendidikan Islam dan Dampaknya Dalam Distorsi. Urwatul Wutsqo: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan Dan Keislaman, 13(1), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.54437/urwatulwutsqo.v13i1.1330
  11. Hs, S. R., & Purba, S. E. E. (2024). A Literature Review on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Learning Innovation. Klasikal: Journal of Education, Language Teaching and Science, 6(3), 1066–1073. https://doi.org/10.52208/klasikal.v6i3.1277
  12. Khalida, R., Rahmandri, A., Ayla, S., & Nurmiati, E. (2025). Etika Teknologi Informasi dalam Dunia Pendidikan : Tinjauan Literatur atas Penggunaan AI dan Isu Plagiarisme Akademik. SAINTEKOM: Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Komputer Dan Manajemen, 15(2), 222–234. https://doi.org/10.33020/saintekom.v15i2.928
  13. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (2.3). EBSE Technical Report EBSE-2007-01.
  14. Kuckertz, A., & Block, J. (2021). Reviewing Systematic Literature Reviews: Ten Key Questions and Criteria for Reviewers. Management Review Quarterly, 71(3), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-021-00228-7
  15. Kurniasari, P., Mardikaningsih, A., & Sari, R. S. (2025). Dependensi Penggunaan Kecerdasan Buatan AI ( Artificial Intelligence ) Terhadap Tugas Akademik Mahasiswa. JUPEIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 4(3), 604–612. https://doi.org/10.57218/jupeis.Vol4.Iss3.1801
  16. Lestari, P. A., Saputri, Z. R., Jamilah, R., Febiyanti, Fadilah, M. F., Firnanda, M. F., & Koeswara, T. S. N. (2026). Illegal Deepfake-Based Artificial Intelligence Content and Efforts to Combat It in Indonesia. JUSI: Jurnal Ilmiah Sistem Informasi, 5(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/10.51903/r5xwq018
  17. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
  18. Oktafiyana, F., & Herlambang, Y. T. (2025). Basic Education in the AI Era: A Critical Analysis in A Philosophical Analysis. SJIP: Sosioedukasi Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 14(4), 3283–3294. https://doi.org/10.36526/sosioedukasi.v14i4.6512
  19. Saputra, R. F., Zamsuri, A., & Amri, A. D. (2025). Tantangan Etika Teknologi dalam Pemanfaatan Artificial Intelligence: Privasi, Bias dan Akuntabilitas dalam Pendidikan di Indonesia. SEMASTER: Prosiding-Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi & Ilmu Komputer, 4(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.31849/r0b2fm79
  20. Scarvada, A. J., Bouzdine-Chameeva, T., Goldstein, S. M., M. Hays, J., & Hill, A. V. (2004). A Review of the Causal Mapping Practice and Research Literature. Second World Conference on POM and 15 Th Annual POM Conference, Cancun, Mexico, April 30 – May 3, 2004.
  21. Shaffril, H. A. M., Samsudin, S. F., & Samah, A. (2021). The ABC of Systematic Literature Review: The Basic Methodological Guidance for Beginners. Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 55(4), 1319–1346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-020-01059-6
  22. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Bussiness Research, 4(1), 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039.
  23. Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic Review of Research on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Higher Education – Where are The Educators ? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
  24. Zhai, C., Wibowo, S., & Li, L. D. (2024). The Effects of Over-Reliance on AI Dialogue Systems on Students ’ Cognitive Abilities :A Systematic Review. Smart Learning Environments, 11(28), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00316-7