Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose − The study aims to determine what factors influence the use of technology in zakat institutions in Indonesia using the Technological, Organizational, Environmental (TOE) model.
Methodology − This research is based on a quantitative online survey of 125 amils at zakat institutions in Indonesia. The sample consisted of 55% men and 45% women. Data were analyzed using SPSS 26 and PLS-SEM to test variables and hypotheses.
Findings − The results showed that organizational readiness and external pressure have a significant positive impact on the use of technology in zakat institutions. Interestingly, Information Technology (IT) infrastructure and interoperability do not significantly affect technology usage because technology users want it to be easy-to-understand and easy-to-use. Thus, an easy-to-understand and easy-to-use technology give an excellent opportunity to achieve the zakat institution's goals.
Originality − This study is one of the first to examine the impact of the variables in the TOE Model on technology usage in Indonesian zakat institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Research limitations − This study was conducted using cross-sectional data, which has limitations in explaining the relationship between variables that are likely to change over time. In addition, some respondents were not familiar with the proposed questionnaire. Lack of understanding may cause respondents to answer questions improperly.
Practical implications − The results are essential for all stakeholders of zakat institutions, especially policymakers, to increase the use of technology to affect the performance of zakat institutions in the context of the realization of zakat, infaq, sadaqah (ZIS) collection in Indonesia.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mubarak, D., Mohd Shafiai, M. H. ., Wahid, H., & Anuar, A. (2022). Covid-19 impact on technology usage: An empirical evidence from Indonesia zakat institutions. Asian Journal of Islamic Management (AJIM), 4(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.20885/AJIM.vol4.iss1.art3

References

  1. Ahmed, H., Mohieldin, M., Verbeek, J., & Aboulmagd, F. (2015). On the sustainable development goals and the role of Islamic finance. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/22000
  2. Alam, S. S., Ali, M. Y., & Jani, M. F. M. (2011). An empirical study of factors affecting electronic commerce adoption among SMEs in Malaysia. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 12(2), 375–399. https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.576749
  3. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167. http://emotrab.ufba.br/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/AMABILE-Teresa-A-model-of-creativity-and-innovation-in-organizations.pdf
  4. Angeles, R., Corritore, C. L., Basu, S. C., & Nath, R. (2001). Success factors for domestic and international Electronic Data interchange (EDI) implementation for US firms. International Journal of Information Management, 21(5), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0268-4012(01)00028-7
  5. Angeles, R., & Nath, R. (2000). An empirical study of EDI trading partner selection criteria in customer-supplier relationships. Information and Management, 37(5), 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(99)00054-3
  6. Asif, Z., & Mandviwalla, M. (2005). Integrating the supply chain with RFID: A technical and business analysis. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 15, 393–426. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.01524
  7. Badan Amil Zakat Nasional (Baznas). (2019). National zakat statistics. https://pid.baznas.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/STATISTIK-ZAKAT-NASIONAL-2019.pdf
  8. Barrett, M. I. (1999). Challenges of EDI adoption for electronic trading in the London insurance market. European Journal of Information Systems, 8(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000313
  9. Bendoly, E., & Kaefer, F. (2004). Business technology complementarities: Impacts of the presence and strategic timing of ERP on B2B e-commerce technology efficiencies. The International Journal of Management Science, 32(5), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.02.004
  10. Broadbent, M., Weill, P., & Neo, B. S. (1999). Strategic context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8, 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(99)00022-0
  11. Canggih, C., Fikriyah, K., & Yasin, A. (2017). Potensi dan realisasi dana zakat Indonesia. Al-Uqud : Journal of Islamic Economics, 1(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.26740/jie.v1n1.p14-26
  12. Cavalcante, S. A. (2013). Understanding the impact of technology on firms’ business models. European Journal of Innovation Management, 16(3), 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-10-2011-0085
  13. Chin, W. W., Marcelin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (1996). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Proceedings of The Seventeenth International Conference on Information Systems, 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.14.2.189.16018
  14. Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information and Management, 45(7), 458–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2008.06.007
  15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (Second Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. http://library1.nida.ac.th/termpaper6/sd/2554/19755.pdf
  16. Cohen, Jon, & Kupferschmidt, K. (2020). The coronavirus seems unstoppable. What should the world do now? https://www.science.org/content/article/coronavirus-seems-unstoppable-what-should-world-do-now
  17. Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
  18. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user accep. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008
  19. Elsayed, E. A., & Zainuddin, Y. (2020). Zakat information technology system design, zakat culture, and zakat performance-conceptual model. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9s), 1816–1825.http://umpir.ump.edu.my/id/eprint/28678/1/Zakat%20Information%20Technology%20System%20Design.pdf
  20. Esrati, S. N., Nor, S. M., & Majid, M. A. (2018). Fintech (blockchain) dan pengurusan zakat di Malaysia. Prosiding Persidangan Kebangsaan Ekonomi Malaysia Ke 13 (2018), December. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329389820_Fintech_Blockchain_dan_Pengurusan_Zakat_di_Malaysia_Financial_Technology_and_Zakah_Management_in_Malaysia
  21. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley. https://people.umass.edu/aizen/f&a1975.html
  22. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research‏. Advances Methods of Marketing Research, 18(3), 382-388. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F002224378101800313
  23. Forum Zakat (FOZ) & Filantropi Indonesia (FI). (2020). Analisis kesiapan lembaga amil zakat dalam menghadapi era digital. Research Report 2020. https://filantropi.or.id/download/analisis-kesiapan-lembaga-amil-zakat-dalam-menghadapi-era-digital/
  24. Gable, G. G. (1996). A multidimensional model of client success when engaging external Consultants. Management Science, 42(8), 1175–1198. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.42.8.1175
  25. Gholami, R., Sulaiman, A. B., Ramayah, T., & Molla, A. (2013). Senior managers’ perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey. Information and Management, 50(7), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.01.004
  26. Govinnage, D. Y., & Sachitra, K. M. V. (2019). Factors affecting e-commerce adoption of small and medium enterprises in Sri Lanka: Evidence from retail sector. Asian Journal of Advanced Research and Reports, 6(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajarr/2019/v6i230147
  27. Grover, V. (1993). An empirically derived model for the adoption of customer-based interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences, 24(3), 603–640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb01295.x
  28. Grover, V., Fiedler, K. D., & Teng, J. T. C. (1999). The role of organizational and information technology antecedents in reengineering initiation behavior. Decision Sciences, 30(3), 749–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb00905.x
  29. Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1995). The implementation of business process reengineering. Journal of Management Information Systems, 12(1), 109–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518072
  30. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80519-7
  31. Hair, J.F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Annabel Ainscow. https://dokumen.pub/qdownload/multivariate-data-analysis-8th-edition-1473756693-9781473756694-1473756545-9781473756540.html
  32. Hair, Joe F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202
  33. Hair, Joe F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  34. Hashim, N. A. (2006). E-commerce adoption issues in Malaysian SMEs. International Conference on E-Commerce, 167–177. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343046081_Electronic_Commerce_Adoption_among_Malaysian_SMEs#fullTextFileContent
  35. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277–319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
  36. Hootsuite. (2020). Global digital overview report. In July Global Statshot Report. https://p.widencdn.net/1zybur/Digital2020Global_Report_en
  37. Ismail, W. N. S. W., & Azwadi, A. (2013). Application of TOE framework in examining the factors influence pre-and post-adoption of CAS in Malaysian SMEs. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 15(1), 122–151. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303822364_application_of_TOE_framework_in_examining_the_factors_Influencing_pre-And_post-Adoption_of_cas_In_malaysian_Smes
  38. Jahangir, N., & Begum, N. (2007). Effect of perceived usefulness, ease of use, security and privacy on customer attitude and adaptation in the context of e-banking. Journal of Management Research, 7(3), 147–157. http://52.172.159.94/index.php/jmr/article/view/37546
  39. Janssens, G. K., & Cuyvers, L. (1991). EDI-A strategic weapon in international trade. Long Range Planning, 24(2), 46–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(91)90078-3
  40. Johari, M. N. S., & Yusoff, H. A. S. (2019). Fintech : Ke arah keberkesanan kutipan dan agihan zakat. International Journal of Zakat and Islamic Philanthropy, 3(2), 49–59. http://journal.zakatkedah.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Vol1_6_9_19.pdf
  41. Kaur, N., Sahdev, S. L., Chaturvedi, V., & Rajawat, D. (2020). Fighting Covid-19 with technology and innovation, evolving and advancing with technological possibilities. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering & Technology, 11(7), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.34218/ijaret.11.7.2020.039
  42. Kompas. (2020). Ketua Baznas: Pengumpulan zakat selama covid-19 naik hingga 46 persen. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2020/07/15/17195001/ketua-baznas-pengumpulan-zakat-selama-covid-19-naik-hingga-46-persen
  43. Leite, H., Lindsay, C., & Kumar, M. (2020). Covid-19 outbreak: Implications on healthcare operations. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-05-2020-0111
  44. Lertwongsatien, C., & Wongpinunwatana, N. (2003). E-commerce adoption in Thailand: An empirical study of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 6(3), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2003.10856356
  45. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., Meyer, A. D., & Coleman, H. J. (1978). Organizational strategy, structure, and process the academy of management review organizational strategy, structure, and process. The Academy of Management Review, 3(3), 546–562. https://doi.org/10.2307/257544
  46. Ngah, A. H., Zainuddin, Y., & Thurasamy, R. (2017). Applying the TOE framework in the halal warehouse adoption study. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 8(2), 161–181. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-04-2014-0014
  47. Pangiuk, Am. (2020). Pengelolaan Zakat di Indonesia (Vol. 1). http://repository.uinjambi.ac.id/6435/1/Pengelolaan%20Zakat%20di%20Indonesia.pdf
  48. Premkumar, G. P. (2000). Interorganization systems and supply chain management: An information processing perspective. Information Systems Management, 17(3), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.1201/1078/43192.17.3.20000601/31241.8
  49. Premkumar, G., & Ramamurthy, K. (1995). The role of interorganizational and organizational factors on the decision mode for adoption of interorganizational systems. Decision Sciences, 26(3), 303–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1995.tb01431.x
  50. Premkumar, G., & Roberts, M. (1999). Adoption of new information technologies in small businesses. Proceedings - Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute, 27(4), 467–484. https://econpapers.repec.org/RePEc:eee:jomega:v:27:y:1999:i:4:p:467-484
  51. Purbasari, I. (2015). Pengelolaan zakat oleh badan dan lembaga amil zakat di Surabaya dan Gresik. Mimbar Hukum, 27(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.15911
  52. Rachman, M. A., & Salam, A. N. (2018). The reinforcement of zakat management through financial technology systems. International Journal of Zakat, 3(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.37706/ijaz.v3i1.68
  53. Rehman, A. A., & Pickup, F. (2018). Zakat for the SDGs. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/blog/2018/zakat-for-the-sdgs.html
  54. Sayekti, F., & Putarta, P. (2016). Penerapan technology acceptance model (TAM) dalam pengujian model penerimaan sistem informasi keuangan daerah. Jurnal Manajemen Teori dan Terapan, 9(3), 196–209. https://doi.org/10.18196/st.231253
  55. Shahzad, A., Hassan, R., Abdullah, N. I., Hussain, A., & Fareed, M. (2020). Covid-19 impact on e-commerce usage: An empirical evidence from Malaysian healthcare industry. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 8(3), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8364
  56. Sheikh, A. A., Rana, N. A., Inam, A., Shahzad, A., & Awan, H. M. (2018). Is e-marketing a source of sustainable business performance? predicting the role of top management support with various interaction factors. Cogent Business and Management, 5(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1516487
  57. Slamet Rusydian, A., & Widiastuti, T. (2019). Technological and efficiency change on zakat organization: Evidence in Indonesia. International Conference of Zakat, January, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.37706/iconz.2018.113
  58. Solomon, E. M., & Klyton, A. van. (2020). The impact of digital technology usage on economic growth in Africa. Utilities Policy, 67(August), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2020.101104
  59. Sophonthummapharn, K. (2009). The adoption of techno-relationship innovations: A framework for electronic customer relationship management. Marketing Intelligence and Planning (Vol. 27, Issue 3). https://doi.org/10.1108/02634500910955254
  60. Sukma, Y. A. A. (2016). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penggunaan K-Cloud di kementerian komunikasi dan informatika. JURNAL IPTEKKOM : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan & Teknologi Informasi, 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.33164/iptekkom.18.1.2016.1-14
  61. Suprima, & Rahman, H. (2019). Regulasi pengelolaan zakat di Indonesia. Jurnal Yuridis, 6(1), 132–146. http://dx.doi.org/10.35586/jyur.v6i1.873
  62. Teo, T. S. H., Ranganathan, C., & Dhaliwal, J. (2006). Key dimensions of inhibitors for the deployment of web-based business-to-business electronic commerce. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(3), 395–411. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.878106
  63. Thomson Reuters, & DinarStandard. (2018). State of the global Islamic Economy Report. https://haladinar.io/hdn/doc/report2018.pdf
  64. Tornatzky, L. G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. https://archive.org/details/processesoftechn0000torn/mode/2up?view=theater
  65. Utami, P. (2019). Digital banking reflection and zakat accoutability sharia banking in Indonesia. Eastern Journal of Economics and Finance, 4(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.20448/809.4.1.31.40
  66. Weill, P., & Vitale, M. (2002). What IT infrastructure capabilities are models, to implement e-business. Mis Quarterly Excecutive, 1(1), 17–34. https://dblp.uni-trier.de/rec/journals/misqe/WeillV02.html
  67. Winarsih, Indriastuti, M., & Fuad, K. (2021). Impact of covid-19 on digital transformation and sustainability in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A conceptual framework. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 471–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50454-0_48
  68. Yahaya, M. H., & Ahmad, K. (2019). Factors affecting the acceptance of financial technology among asnaf for the distribution of zakat in Selangor - A study using UTAUT. Journal of Islamic Finance, 8 (Special Issue), 035–046. https://journals.iium.edu.my/iiibf-journal/index.php/jif/article/view/345